Early palliative care, intensity of end-of-life care, and their impact on overall survival in cancer patients: A real-world study.

12065 Background: Early palliative care (EPC) and reduced aggressive end-of-life (EOL) interventions improve quality of life in advanced cancer. While trials suggest a potential survival benefit, the real-world impact on overall survival (OS) remains underexplored. This study examines the association between palliative care (PC) timing, EOL care intensity, and OS in a large real-world cohort. Methods: We conducted a population-based study using the French health claims database (SNDS) for patients with metastatic solid tumors diagnosed within 2 years who died in 2022. Patients with hematologic malignancies or PC initiated before metastasis were excluded. Patients were stratified by PC referral timing: no PC, EPC (≤2 months post-diagnosis), and late PC (LPC) ( > 2 months post-diagnosis). EOL care intensity was assessed using Earle criteria (care structure/processes) and MIEOL criteria (physically invasive interventions). The primary endpoint was OS (time from diagnosis to death). Results: Among 159,288 decedents, 85,192 met inclusion criteria (no PC = 27,325; EPC = 29,016; LPC = 28,851). Digestive (n = 29,668) and pulmonary (n = 17,065) cancers predominated. Patients with EPC/no PC had higher poor-prognosis adapted Charlson scores than LPC (23.6% and 23.4% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). EOL aggressiveness was greater in no PC compared to EPC/LPC (Earle ≥1: 51.4% vs. 23.4% vs. 21.6%; MIEOL ≥1: 25.7% vs. 16.9% vs. 17.6%; p < 0.001). Mean OS differed significantly (no PC: 167 ± 190 ; EPC: 74 ± 100 days days; LPC: 344 ± 182 days; p < 0.001). LPC was associated with the longest OS. Patients meeting Earle and MIEOL criteria were significantly associated with shorter survival (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This real-world analysis revealed no survival advantage with early PC initiation, likely reflecting clinical fragility in these patients. Early referral often signifies advanced disease rather than a direct survival benefit of PC itself. LPC was linked to the longest survival, emphasizing the need for graduated PC from metastatic diagnosis. No PC was associated with higher EOL care intensity, which did not improve survival, highlighting possible unreasonable overtreatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.12065
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early palliative care, intensity of end-of-life care, and their impact on overall survival in cancer patients: A real-world study.

Karine Baumstarck, Géraldine Capodano, Sébastien Salas, P. Debourdeau et al.
2 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Early palliative care, intensity of end-of-life care, and their impact on overall survival in cancer patients: A real-world study.

Karine Baumstarck, Géraldine Capodano, Sébastien Salas, P. Debourdeau, A Blay, Cécile Gastaldi, David Lapalus, S. Nauleau, E. Durand
article en

Abstract

12065 Background: Early palliative care (EPC) and reduced aggressive end-of-life (EOL) interventions improve quality of life in advanced cancer. While trials suggest a potential survival benefit, the real-world impact on overall survival (OS) remains underexplored. This study examines the association between palliative care (PC) timing, EOL care intensity, and OS in a large real-world cohort. Methods: We conducted a population-based study using the French health claims database (SNDS) for patients with metastatic solid tumors diagnosed within 2 years who died in 2022. Patients with hematologic malignancies or PC initiated before metastasis were excluded. Patients were stratified by PC referral timing: no PC, EPC (≤2 months post-diagnosis), and late PC (LPC) ( > 2 months post-diagnosis). EOL care intensity was assessed using Earle criteria (care structure/processes) and MIEOL criteria (physically invasive interventions). The primary endpoint was OS (time from diagnosis to death). Results: Among 159,288 decedents, 85,192 met inclusion criteria (no PC = 27,325; EPC = 29,016; LPC = 28,851). Digestive (n = 29,668) and pulmonary (n = 17,065) cancers predominated. Patients with EPC/no PC had higher poor-prognosis adapted Charlson scores than LPC (23.6% and 23.4% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). EOL aggressiveness was greater in no PC compared to EPC/LPC (Earle ≥1: 51.4% vs. 23.4% vs. 21.6%; MIEOL ≥1: 25.7% vs. 16.9% vs. 17.6%; p < 0.001). Mean OS differed significantly (no PC: 167 ± 190 ; EPC: 74 ± 100 days days; LPC: 344 ± 182 days; p < 0.001). LPC was associated with the longest OS. Patients meeting Earle and MIEOL criteria were significantly associated with shorter survival (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This real-world analysis revealed no survival advantage with early PC initiation, likely reflecting clinical fragility in these patients. Early referral often signifies advanced disease rather than a direct survival benefit of PC itself. LPC was linked to the longest survival, emphasizing the need for graduated PC from metastatic diagnosis. No PC was associated with higher EOL care intensity, which did not improve survival, highlighting possible unreasonable overtreatment.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Délégation Régionale Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur et Corse (FR), Services déconcentrés d'appui à la recherche Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur (FR), Institut Paoli-Calmettes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.