Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Child-Pugh B and C hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact of treatment line, local therapy and bevacizumab combination.

e16175 Background: The safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in Child-Pugh (CP)-B and CP-C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients remain uncertain. In a multidisciplinary system a considerable number of patients will belong to this population and do not qualify for standard of care ICI-based regimens. This study presents a retrospective review of ICI in this specific population at our institution. Methods: This study included HCC patients who received at least one ICI dose between 1/1/2017 and 6/30/23 at Ohio State University. Clinical and pathological characteristics of interest were extracted through chart review. Survival outcomes assessed in this study include progression-free survival (PFS; date of first dose of ICI (Fd-ICI) to progression or death (D) or loss of follow-up (L-f/u)), overall survival (OS; date of diagnosis to D or L-f/u), and ICI-specific OS (OS-ICI; Fd-ICI to D or L-f/u). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate PFS, OS-ICI, and OS survival distributions. Median survival times were calculated and compared between groups using the Wilcoxon test. Results: We had 25 patients (19 CP-B and 6 CP-C) in the study cohort (SC) with a median age of 67 years (range: 48-84), 72% males and 88% Caucasians. Most of them (96%) had ascites, and 40% had hepatic encephalopathy at the time of ICI initiation. Seven patients had tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and 15 had local therapy (LT) before ICI. Most received single-agent ICI (n = 17), while 8 had it combined with bevacizumab (BEV). Median doses of ICI for the group were 3 (range, 1-25) and were better in CP-B (4, 1-25) than in CP C (1, 1-4) population. The group's median PFS, OS-ICI, and OS (in days) were 159, 222, and 439, respectively. The CP-B subgroup had better median PFS (242 vs. 41 days, p = 0.0002) and median OS-ICI (235 vs. 50 days, p = 0.0046) than CP-C. However, the median OS had no significant difference (497 vs. 290 days, p = 0.4). BEV combination improved the OS-ICI (242 vs. 127 days, p = 0.04) but not PFS or OS for the SC (CP-B + C). Additionally, ICI in the second line or more (583 vs. 244, p = 0.02) and specifically after LT (575 vs. 252 days, p = 0.02) improved the OS of this study cohort. Similar findings were noted in the CP-B subgroup (line - 575 vs. 252 days, p = 0.02 and LT - 678 vs. 293 days, p = 0.02). Only two patients experienced grade 3 immune-related adverse events (dermatitis and colitis); no complications were associated with BEV. Conclusions: ICIs can be safely and effectively used in CP-B patients with advanced HCC, particularly after LT and in second-line or later settings. CP-C patients derive limited benefit, highlighting the need for cautious selection. Combining BEV with ICIs is safe and may offer survival benefits in this challenging population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16175
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Child-Pugh B and C hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact of treatment line, local therapy and bevacizumab combination.

Fode Tounkara, Ashish Manne, Khalid Mumtaz, Parthib Das
2 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Child-Pugh B and C hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact of treatment line, local therapy and bevacizumab combination.

Fode Tounkara, Ashish Manne, Khalid Mumtaz, Parthib Das
article en

Abstract

e16175 Background: The safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in Child-Pugh (CP)-B and CP-C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients remain uncertain. In a multidisciplinary system a considerable number of patients will belong to this population and do not qualify for standard of care ICI-based regimens. This study presents a retrospective review of ICI in this specific population at our institution. Methods: This study included HCC patients who received at least one ICI dose between 1/1/2017 and 6/30/23 at Ohio State University. Clinical and pathological characteristics of interest were extracted through chart review. Survival outcomes assessed in this study include progression-free survival (PFS; date of first dose of ICI (Fd-ICI) to progression or death (D) or loss of follow-up (L-f/u)), overall survival (OS; date of diagnosis to D or L-f/u), and ICI-specific OS (OS-ICI; Fd-ICI to D or L-f/u). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate PFS, OS-ICI, and OS survival distributions. Median survival times were calculated and compared between groups using the Wilcoxon test. Results: We had 25 patients (19 CP-B and 6 CP-C) in the study cohort (SC) with a median age of 67 years (range: 48-84), 72% males and 88% Caucasians. Most of them (96%) had ascites, and 40% had hepatic encephalopathy at the time of ICI initiation. Seven patients had tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and 15 had local therapy (LT) before ICI. Most received single-agent ICI (n = 17), while 8 had it combined with bevacizumab (BEV). Median doses of ICI for the group were 3 (range, 1-25) and were better in CP-B (4, 1-25) than in CP C (1, 1-4) population. The group's median PFS, OS-ICI, and OS (in days) were 159, 222, and 439, respectively. The CP-B subgroup had better median PFS (242 vs. 41 days, p = 0.0002) and median OS-ICI (235 vs. 50 days, p = 0.0046) than CP-C. However, the median OS had no significant difference (497 vs. 290 days, p = 0.4). BEV combination improved the OS-ICI (242 vs. 127 days, p = 0.04) but not PFS or OS for the SC (CP-B + C). Additionally, ICI in the second line or more (583 vs. 244, p = 0.02) and specifically after LT (575 vs. 252 days, p = 0.02) improved the OS of this study cohort. Similar findings were noted in the CP-B subgroup (line - 575 vs. 252 days, p = 0.02 and LT - 678 vs. 293 days, p = 0.02). Only two patients experienced grade 3 immune-related adverse events (dermatitis and colitis); no complications were associated with BEV. Conclusions: ICIs can be safely and effectively used in CP-B patients with advanced HCC, particularly after LT and in second-line or later settings. CP-C patients derive limited benefit, highlighting the need for cautious selection. Combining BEV with ICIs is safe and may offer survival benefits in this challenging population.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.