Design of solar fields for Concentrated Solar Power plants considering operation & maintenance activities

Properly sizing the solar field in Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants is crucial for their economic performance. Current techniques overlook operation and maintenance (O&M) costs which can significantly affect the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), and fail to incorporate key O&M-related productivity losses, such as heliostat failures and soiling, within their productivity models. This study presents an approach for designing the solar power plant including O&M costs for heliostats repair and cleaning, concurrently identifying the optimal deployment of cleaning resources. The developed methodology is applied for a modular solar tower plant in Mount Isa, Australia, where the solar field size that minimizes the LCOE is identified, simultaneously optimizing the power block (PB) and the thermal energy storage (TES) capacity. The outcomes of the analysis show that including O&M expenses due to heliostats repair and cleaning leads to a larger solar field: the optimal design for the LCOE scenario features a 22 % oversize. This configuration is paired with a PB of 32 MW and a TES of 1326 MW h-14.5 h, significantly smaller than the 56 MW, 2320 MW h-14.5 h reference. In the grid-driven scenario , the optimal solar field is also oversized by 22 %, with a PB of 56 MW matching the reference size, and a smaller 1520 MW h-9.5 h TES. This methodology emphasizes the impact of O&M activities on plant design, alongside the influence of turbine operation. • Methodology developed to include O&M in the design of solar field, TES, and PB. • Optimal size of the solar field is not significantly affected by heliostats reliability. • Optimal size of the solar field is augmented due to heliostats soiling. • Accounting for grid constraint increases PB and TES, keeping solar field design unchanged. • ACOE is adopted when assessing grid constraints, resulting in a 27% increase to LCOE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solar Energy
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.113564
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design of solar fields for Concentrated Solar Power plants considering operation & maintenance activities

Giampaolo Manzolini, Giovanni Picotti, Cody B. Anderson, Michael E. Cholette et al.
4 citations
Solar Energy
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
1.45
article

Design of solar fields for Concentrated Solar Power plants considering operation & maintenance activities

Giampaolo Manzolini, Giovanni Picotti, Cody B. Anderson, Michael E. Cholette, C. Lupi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Properly sizing the solar field in Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants is crucial for their economic performance. Current techniques overlook operation and maintenance (O&M) costs which can significantly affect the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), and fail to incorporate key O&M-related productivity losses, such as heliostat failures and soiling, within their productivity models. This study presents an approach for designing the solar power plant including O&M costs for heliostats repair and cleaning, concurrently identifying the optimal deployment of cleaning resources. The developed methodology is applied for a modular solar tower plant in Mount Isa, Australia, where the solar field size that minimizes the LCOE is identified, simultaneously optimizing the power block (PB) and the thermal energy storage (TES) capacity. The outcomes of the analysis show that including O&M expenses due to heliostats repair and cleaning leads to a larger solar field: the optimal design for the LCOE scenario features a 22 % oversize. This configuration is paired with a PB of 32 MW and a TES of 1326 MW h-14.5 h, significantly smaller than the 56 MW, 2320 MW h-14.5 h reference. In the grid-driven scenario , the optimal solar field is also oversized by 22 %, with a PB of 56 MW matching the reference size, and a smaller 1520 MW h-9.5 h TES. This methodology emphasizes the impact of O&M activities on plant design, alongside the influence of turbine operation. • Methodology developed to include O&M in the design of solar field, TES, and PB. • Optimal size of the solar field is not significantly affected by heliostats reliability. • Optimal size of the solar field is augmented due to heliostats soiling. • Accounting for grid constraint increases PB and TES, keeping solar field design unchanged. • ACOE is adopted when assessing grid constraints, resulting in a 27% increase to LCOE.

Solar EnergyVol. 297
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
1.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.