Ampullary adenocarcinoma: What is the best approach? Insights from a large retrospective series.

e16473 Background: Ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC) is rare (~0.2% of gastrointestinal cancers), but is increasing in incidence. Knowledge about risk factors, diagnosis and optimal treatment of AAC is still limited. Methods: We conducteda retrospective analysis of patients (pts) diagnosed with AAC between January 2015 and December 2023. Baseline clinical and histopathological data were collected. We used a multivariable Cox regression model to test the prognostic impact of clinical and treatment-related variables. Results: A total of 106 pts were included with median age of 69 years (37–84), 58.5% (n = 62) male. ECOG performance status was ≤ 1 in 92.5% (n = 98) of cases. Localized disease was present in 96.2% (n = 102), with 28.3% (n = 30) stage I, 6.6% (n = 7) stage II, and 61.3% (n = 65) stage III. Adjuvant therapy was given to 47% (n = 48) of pts, with 39 pts receiving chemotherapy and 9 pts receiving chemoradiotherapy. Gemcitabine (n = 14) and capecitabine (n = 9) were the most used agents in adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, respectively. Median follow-up was 29.3 months (1–114). Recurrence occurred in 26.5% (n = 27), with a median time to recurrence of 25.7 months (1-113). Median recurrence-free survival (mRFS) was not reached ([NR], NR-NR) for pts undergoing curative surgery at diagnosis. There was no statistical difference in mRFS between the intestinal and pancreatobiliary subtypes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, p = 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-1.7). Factors associated with lower mRFS in localized disease included T3-4 tumors (HR 3.2, p = 0.003, 95%CI 1.4-7.1), N+ disease (HR 2.35, p = 0.031, 95%CI 1.1-5.3), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (HR 2.45, p = 0.015, 95%CI 1.2-5.3),perineural invasion (PnI) (HR 2.9, p = 0.002, 95%CI 1.4-6.2), histological grade 3 (HR 2.7, p = 0.003, 95%CI 1.4-5.6), and R1 resection (HR 4.06, p < 0.001, 95%CI 1.9-8.9). Adjuvant therapy was not associated with a higher mRFS (HR 0.71, p = 0.35, 95%CI 0.4-1.5). Median overall survival (mOS) was not reached ([NR], NR-NR) for localized disease and was 13.6 (10.9-16.3) months for all-time stage IV disease, with 11.8 months for first line therapy and 5.9 months for second line. Worse mOS in pts with localized disease ab initio was associated with T3-T4 tumors (HR 3.28, p = 0.002, 95%CI 1.5-7.3), N+ disease (HR 2.4, p = 0.026, 95%CI 1.1-5.4), LVI and PnI (HR 2.7, p = 0.006, 95%CI 1.3-5.9 and HR 3.2, p < 0.001, 95%CI 1.5-6.6, respectively), histological grade 3 (HR 2.8, p = 0.003, 95%CI 1.3-5.7), R1 surgery (HR 3.4, p = 0.001, 95%CI 1.56-7.38). Conclusions: In this large series of pts diagnosed with AAC, adjuvant therapy did not seem to make a statistical difference in both mRFS and mOS. Size, N status, LVI, PnI, histological grade, and resection margin are significant prognostic factors and should guide treatment strategies. Further research is needed to optimize patient selection and treatment strategies for prognosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16473
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ampullary adenocarcinoma: What is the best approach? Insights from a large retrospective series.

M. Sardinha, Nguyen Ba Giao, I. Furtado, João Boavida Ferreira
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Ampullary adenocarcinoma: What is the best approach? Insights from a large retrospective series.

M. Sardinha, Nguyen Ba Giao, I. Furtado, João Boavida Ferreira
article en

Abstract

e16473 Background: Ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC) is rare (~0.2% of gastrointestinal cancers), but is increasing in incidence. Knowledge about risk factors, diagnosis and optimal treatment of AAC is still limited. Methods: We conducteda retrospective analysis of patients (pts) diagnosed with AAC between January 2015 and December 2023. Baseline clinical and histopathological data were collected. We used a multivariable Cox regression model to test the prognostic impact of clinical and treatment-related variables. Results: A total of 106 pts were included with median age of 69 years (37–84), 58.5% (n = 62) male. ECOG performance status was ≤ 1 in 92.5% (n = 98) of cases. Localized disease was present in 96.2% (n = 102), with 28.3% (n = 30) stage I, 6.6% (n = 7) stage II, and 61.3% (n = 65) stage III. Adjuvant therapy was given to 47% (n = 48) of pts, with 39 pts receiving chemotherapy and 9 pts receiving chemoradiotherapy. Gemcitabine (n = 14) and capecitabine (n = 9) were the most used agents in adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, respectively. Median follow-up was 29.3 months (1–114). Recurrence occurred in 26.5% (n = 27), with a median time to recurrence of 25.7 months (1-113). Median recurrence-free survival (mRFS) was not reached ([NR], NR-NR) for pts undergoing curative surgery at diagnosis. There was no statistical difference in mRFS between the intestinal and pancreatobiliary subtypes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, p = 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-1.7). Factors associated with lower mRFS in localized disease included T3-4 tumors (HR 3.2, p = 0.003, 95%CI 1.4-7.1), N+ disease (HR 2.35, p = 0.031, 95%CI 1.1-5.3), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (HR 2.45, p = 0.015, 95%CI 1.2-5.3),perineural invasion (PnI) (HR 2.9, p = 0.002, 95%CI 1.4-6.2), histological grade 3 (HR 2.7, p = 0.003, 95%CI 1.4-5.6), and R1 resection (HR 4.06, p < 0.001, 95%CI 1.9-8.9). Adjuvant therapy was not associated with a higher mRFS (HR 0.71, p = 0.35, 95%CI 0.4-1.5). Median overall survival (mOS) was not reached ([NR], NR-NR) for localized disease and was 13.6 (10.9-16.3) months for all-time stage IV disease, with 11.8 months for first line therapy and 5.9 months for second line. Worse mOS in pts with localized disease ab initio was associated with T3-T4 tumors (HR 3.28, p = 0.002, 95%CI 1.5-7.3), N+ disease (HR 2.4, p = 0.026, 95%CI 1.1-5.4), LVI and PnI (HR 2.7, p = 0.006, 95%CI 1.3-5.9 and HR 3.2, p < 0.001, 95%CI 1.5-6.6, respectively), histological grade 3 (HR 2.8, p = 0.003, 95%CI 1.3-5.7), R1 surgery (HR 3.4, p = 0.001, 95%CI 1.56-7.38). Conclusions: In this large series of pts diagnosed with AAC, adjuvant therapy did not seem to make a statistical difference in both mRFS and mOS. Size, N status, LVI, PnI, histological grade, and resection margin are significant prognostic factors and should guide treatment strategies. Further research is needed to optimize patient selection and treatment strategies for prognosis.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.