A phase II study of pevonedistat in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: ECOG-ACRIN EA2187.

4115 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy with limited therapeutic options, particularly in advanced stages. Resistance to first-line chemotherapy underscores the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. Pevonedistat, a first-in-class NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, demonstrated promising activity in this disease in a phase I trial. This study evaluates pevonedistat alone and in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: This was a randomized, non-comparative Phase II trial investigating two treatment arms: pevonedistat monotherapy (Arm A) and pevonedistat combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel (Arm B). Both arms utilized a two-stage minimax design, targeting an objective response rate (ORR) of 30% (null hypothesis: 10%). Eligible patients had unresectable or metastatic ICC with progression after gemcitabine-based therapy. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Toxicities were graded using CTCAE v5.0. Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled, with 34 eligible and treated (17 per arm). Median follow-up was 29.3 months. No objective responses were observed in either arm. Stable disease was the best response in 35.3% (n = 12) of patients (11.8% Arm A, 58.8% Arm B). One patient on Arm B achieved stable disease lasting ≥24 weeks, corresponding to a CBR of 5.9% (95% CI: 0.1%-28.7%). Median PFS was 1.54 months (Arm A) and 2.92 months (Arm B). Median OS was 4.80 months (Arm A) and 6.54 months (Arm B). Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred in 44.1% of patients, with higher incidence in Arm B (70.6% vs. 17.6% in Arm A). Most common toxicities included fatigue, cytopenias, febrile neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, among others. Two treatment-related fatalities were reported on Arm B: sepsis and colonic perforation. Conclusions: Pevonedistat, alone or in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, did not demonstrate sufficient efficacy to warrant further evaluation in advanced ICC. These findings highlight the challenges in treating this aggressive malignancy. Despite the rarity of ICC, the rapid accrual of this study during a global pandemic indicates the potential for continued exploration of novel therapeutic approaches in this disease. Clinical trial information: NCT04175912 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.4115
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A phase II study of pevonedistat in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: ECOG-ACRIN EA2187.

Kathryn Cunningham Hourdequin, Anup Kasi, Suneel D. Kamath, Peter James O'Dwyer et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

A phase II study of pevonedistat in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: ECOG-ACRIN EA2187.

Kathryn Cunningham Hourdequin, Anup Kasi, Suneel D. Kamath, Peter James O'Dwyer, Anita Turk, Dustin A. Deming, Noah Graham, Devalingam Mahalingam
article en

Abstract

4115 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy with limited therapeutic options, particularly in advanced stages. Resistance to first-line chemotherapy underscores the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. Pevonedistat, a first-in-class NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, demonstrated promising activity in this disease in a phase I trial. This study evaluates pevonedistat alone and in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: This was a randomized, non-comparative Phase II trial investigating two treatment arms: pevonedistat monotherapy (Arm A) and pevonedistat combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel (Arm B). Both arms utilized a two-stage minimax design, targeting an objective response rate (ORR) of 30% (null hypothesis: 10%). Eligible patients had unresectable or metastatic ICC with progression after gemcitabine-based therapy. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Toxicities were graded using CTCAE v5.0. Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled, with 34 eligible and treated (17 per arm). Median follow-up was 29.3 months. No objective responses were observed in either arm. Stable disease was the best response in 35.3% (n = 12) of patients (11.8% Arm A, 58.8% Arm B). One patient on Arm B achieved stable disease lasting ≥24 weeks, corresponding to a CBR of 5.9% (95% CI: 0.1%-28.7%). Median PFS was 1.54 months (Arm A) and 2.92 months (Arm B). Median OS was 4.80 months (Arm A) and 6.54 months (Arm B). Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred in 44.1% of patients, with higher incidence in Arm B (70.6% vs. 17.6% in Arm A). Most common toxicities included fatigue, cytopenias, febrile neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, among others. Two treatment-related fatalities were reported on Arm B: sepsis and colonic perforation. Conclusions: Pevonedistat, alone or in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, did not demonstrate sufficient efficacy to warrant further evaluation in advanced ICC. These findings highlight the challenges in treating this aggressive malignancy. Despite the rarity of ICC, the rapid accrual of this study during a global pandemic indicates the potential for continued exploration of novel therapeutic approaches in this disease. Clinical trial information: NCT04175912 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Northwestern University (US), Indiana University Health (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), The University of Kansas Cancer Center (US), University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US), Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.