The language of suicide

Key digested message The language and understanding of suicide have evolved over time, shaped by both experts and laypeople. Researchers debate definitions of suicide, focusing on intent, rationality, and forms of self-destructive behaviour, such as chronic or indirect suicides. Laypeople, on the other hand, emphasize reducing stigma in terminology, replacing phrases like ‘committed suicide’ with ‘died by suicide.’ Terms like ‘suicidality, ’ ‘non-suicidal self-injury,’ and classifications such as ‘suicide-by-cop’ reflect the complexities in studying self-harm behaviours. The inclusion of those with lived experiences in discussions has further influenced changes in terminology and perspectives. Meanwhile, debates continue about categorizing acts like physician-assisted suicide and whether societal labels like ‘successful’ or ‘failed’ suicides unintentionally reinforce biases. Overall, the discussion reflects the need for nuanced, stigma-free approaches to understanding suicide and related behaviours.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Assessment and Development Matters
Published
2025-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsadm.2025.17.1.40
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The language of suicide

David Lester
Assessment and Development Matters
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

The language of suicide

David Lester
article en

Abstract

Key digested message The language and understanding of suicide have evolved over time, shaped by both experts and laypeople. Researchers debate definitions of suicide, focusing on intent, rationality, and forms of self-destructive behaviour, such as chronic or indirect suicides. Laypeople, on the other hand, emphasize reducing stigma in terminology, replacing phrases like ‘committed suicide’ with ‘died by suicide.’ Terms like ‘suicidality, ’ ‘non-suicidal self-injury,’ and classifications such as ‘suicide-by-cop’ reflect the complexities in studying self-harm behaviours. The inclusion of those with lived experiences in discussions has further influenced changes in terminology and perspectives. Meanwhile, debates continue about categorizing acts like physician-assisted suicide and whether societal labels like ‘successful’ or ‘failed’ suicides unintentionally reinforce biases. Overall, the discussion reflects the need for nuanced, stigma-free approaches to understanding suicide and related behaviours.

Assessment and Development MattersVol. 17(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.