Institutions, innovations, organizations: aspects of the early intellectual and institutional history of <i>Industrial and Corporate Change</i>

Abstract Seen as one of the key interdisciplinary “hot groups” in the history of research on historical, evolutionary, and behavioral perspectives on industry dynamics and management research, the milieu around Industrial and Corporate Change (ICC) reflects and shares emphasis on several of the themes of another influential hot group, the Carnegie School’s behavioral organization perspective, as well as shared roots with the intellectual environments around the SPRU group. We discuss some of the intellectual, institutional, and organizational forces that helped shape the early years and interdisciplinary vision and scope of ICC; the importance of the early enthusiasm and passion of both key members of ICC and the intellectual fields, and some of the enablers (and resistances) to the early interdisciplinary work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Corporate Change
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaf015
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutions, innovations, organizations: aspects of the early intellectual and institutional history of Industrial and Corporate Change

David J. Teece, Mie Augier
2 citations
Industrial and Corporate Change
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
6.17
article

Institutions, innovations, organizations: aspects of the early intellectual and institutional history of Industrial and Corporate Change

David J. Teece, Mie Augier
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Seen as one of the key interdisciplinary “hot groups” in the history of research on historical, evolutionary, and behavioral perspectives on industry dynamics and management research, the milieu around Industrial and Corporate Change (ICC) reflects and shares emphasis on several of the themes of another influential hot group, the Carnegie School’s behavioral organization perspective, as well as shared roots with the intellectual environments around the SPRU group. We discuss some of the intellectual, institutional, and organizational forces that helped shape the early years and interdisciplinary vision and scope of ICC; the importance of the early enthusiasm and passion of both key members of ICC and the intellectual fields, and some of the enablers (and resistances) to the early interdisciplinary work.

Industrial and Corporate ChangeVol. 34(4)
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
6.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.