The impact of firstline immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors combinations versus sunitinib on clinical outcomes of favorable risk advanced renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized studies.

e16504 Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults, with clear cell carcinoma being the predominant histological subtype. Recent clinical trials have established the combination of immunotherapy (IO) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as a therapeutic approach to enhance anti-tumor efficacy, surpassing the outcomes achieved with Sunitinib monotherapy. Despite these advancements, the comparative efficacy of IO+TKIs versus Sunitinib alone in IMDC favorable risk advanced RCC patients remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate and synthesize existing evidence to determine the survival outcomes and therapeutic benefits of IO+TKIs compared to Sunitinib in this patient population. Methods: A review of the medical literature was conducted using online databases. Inclusion criteria consisted of the English language, diagnosis of advanced RCC, randomized studies of IO+TKI versus Sunitinib, and studies that reported overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the IMDC favorable risk group discretely. A meta-analysis using the fixed-effects and random-effects models was conducted. Results: Four randomized studies with a total of 839 patients were included. All studies reported OS and PFS for IMDC favorable risk advanced RCC. The IO+TKI regimens comprised: Avelumab+Axitinib, Nivolumab+Cabozantinib, Pembrolizumab+Lenvatinib, and Pembrolizumab+Axitinib. There was no OS benefit for IO+TKI when compared to Sunitinib (HR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.72-1.31; I 2 = 0.00%). However, IO+TKI combinations had a better PFS than Sunitinib (HR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.53-0.81; I 2 = 21.43%). Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that while first-line IO+TKI combinations significantly improve PFS compared to Sunitinib in IMDC favorable risk advanced RCC, they do not confer a statistically significant OS benefit. Nevertheless, this superior PFS observed with IO+TKI regimens suggests enhanced disease control, which is still a meaningful clinical outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16504
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of firstline immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors combinations versus sunitinib on clinical outcomes of favorable risk advanced renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized studies.

Sireesha Vutukuri, Ankita Gupta, Philip A. Haddad, Jamie Lee Aldakkour
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

The impact of firstline immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors combinations versus sunitinib on clinical outcomes of favorable risk advanced renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized studies.

Sireesha Vutukuri, Ankita Gupta, Philip A. Haddad, Jamie Lee Aldakkour
article en

Abstract

e16504 Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults, with clear cell carcinoma being the predominant histological subtype. Recent clinical trials have established the combination of immunotherapy (IO) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as a therapeutic approach to enhance anti-tumor efficacy, surpassing the outcomes achieved with Sunitinib monotherapy. Despite these advancements, the comparative efficacy of IO+TKIs versus Sunitinib alone in IMDC favorable risk advanced RCC patients remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate and synthesize existing evidence to determine the survival outcomes and therapeutic benefits of IO+TKIs compared to Sunitinib in this patient population. Methods: A review of the medical literature was conducted using online databases. Inclusion criteria consisted of the English language, diagnosis of advanced RCC, randomized studies of IO+TKI versus Sunitinib, and studies that reported overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the IMDC favorable risk group discretely. A meta-analysis using the fixed-effects and random-effects models was conducted. Results: Four randomized studies with a total of 839 patients were included. All studies reported OS and PFS for IMDC favorable risk advanced RCC. The IO+TKI regimens comprised: Avelumab+Axitinib, Nivolumab+Cabozantinib, Pembrolizumab+Lenvatinib, and Pembrolizumab+Axitinib. There was no OS benefit for IO+TKI when compared to Sunitinib (HR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.72-1.31; I 2 = 0.00%). However, IO+TKI combinations had a better PFS than Sunitinib (HR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.53-0.81; I 2 = 21.43%). Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that while first-line IO+TKI combinations significantly improve PFS compared to Sunitinib in IMDC favorable risk advanced RCC, they do not confer a statistically significant OS benefit. Nevertheless, this superior PFS observed with IO+TKI regimens suggests enhanced disease control, which is still a meaningful clinical outcome.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Overton Brooks VA Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.