Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with paclitaxel plus ramucirumab (PTX-RAM) switch maintenance versus continuation of first-line fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin (FOX) chemotherapy (ChT) in patients (pts) with advanced HER2-negative gastric or

4060 Background: PTX-RAM switch maintenance significantly improved PFS (HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.48–0.79; p = 0.0002) and OS (HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.58–0.96; p = 0.025) versus continuation of FOX first-line ChT in the ARMANI trial, with a higher incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events and an increased number of hospital visits. Here we present HRQoL results. Methods: ARMANI was an Italian multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial enrolling pts with HER2-negative G/GEJ cancer who had disease control after a 3-month FOX induction ChT, and randomized to switch maintenance with PTX-RAM or the continuation of FOX. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQC30, QLQOG25 and EuroQol EQ5D were assessed at randomization and every 8 weeks until progression. HRQoL changes over time were described by: (i) mean changes from baseline at each time point, (ii) distribution of improved/stable/worse at 8 weeks and (iii) time to QoL deterioration (TTD), defined as the time from randomization to a worsening ≥ 10 points of global QoL in EORTC QLQC30. Mean changes were compared by a linear regression model, with baseline values as covariates. Proportion of improved/stable/worse was compared by Chi square test. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model were used for TTD estimation. Results: Of the 280 pts randomized, 198 (71%; 109/144 with PTX-RAM and 89/136 with FOX) and 133 (48%; 81/144 and 52/136) completed baseline and 8-weeks assessment of EORTC and EQ5D, respectively. Mean baseline scores of global HRQoL were 66.90 (standard deviation [SD] 20.71) with PTX-RAM and 70.97 (SD 19.39) with FOX. Global QoL at 8-weeks assessment was better with PTX-RAM versus FOX both in terms of mean changes from baseline (+2.17 vs -8.51, delta 10.68, p = 0.015) and in terms of proportion of improved/stable/worse (improved 24.7% vs 4.2%, stable 56.2% vs 64.6%, worse 19.2% vs 31.3%, p = 0.009). TTD was significantly longer for PTX-RAM versus FOX (median TTD 7.6 vs 3.8 months, HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.33-0.82; p = 0.005). Mean changes from baseline after 8 weeks for functional scales and symptoms of QLQC30 and QLQOG25 showed significant improvement for PTX-RAM vs FOX for role functioning (p = 0.006), nausea/vomiting (p = 0.002), pain (p = 0.016), appetite loss (p = 0.03) and dysphagia (p = 0.028); hair loss was worse with PTX-RAM (p = 0.024). VAS score from EQ5D was not significantly different between the two treatments for all the assessments. Conclusions: In pts with HER2-negative advanced G/GEJ cancer, PTX-RAM switch maintenance, beyond a significant benefit in PFS and OS, showed significant benefit in terms of HRQoL, reducing symptoms and delaying global QoL deterioration. Clinical trial information: NCT02934464 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.4060
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with paclitaxel plus ramucirumab (PTX-RAM) switch maintenance versus continuation of first-line fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin (FOX) chemotherapy (ChT) in patients (pts) with advanced HER2-negative gastric or

Tiziana Pia Latiano, Margherita Ambrosini, Stefano Tamberi, Massimo Di Maïo et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
1.52
article

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with paclitaxel plus ramucirumab (PTX-RAM) switch maintenance versus continuation of first-line fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin (FOX) chemotherapy (ChT) in patients (pts) with advanced HER2-negative gastric or

Tiziana Pia Latiano, Margherita Ambrosini, Stefano Tamberi, Massimo Di Maïo, Ferdinando De Vita, Claudio Chini, Daniele Spada, Andrea Spallanzani, Antonia Strippoli, Alessandro Bittoni, Lorenzo Fornaro, Sabina Murgioni, Elisa Giommoni, Giovanni Randon, Samantha Di Donato, Giovanni Gerardo Cardellino, Filippo Pietrantonio, Eleonora Cristarella, Oronzo Brunetti, S. Alessandrini
article en
1 citations

Abstract

4060 Background: PTX-RAM switch maintenance significantly improved PFS (HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.48–0.79; p = 0.0002) and OS (HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.58–0.96; p = 0.025) versus continuation of FOX first-line ChT in the ARMANI trial, with a higher incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events and an increased number of hospital visits. Here we present HRQoL results. Methods: ARMANI was an Italian multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial enrolling pts with HER2-negative G/GEJ cancer who had disease control after a 3-month FOX induction ChT, and randomized to switch maintenance with PTX-RAM or the continuation of FOX. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQC30, QLQOG25 and EuroQol EQ5D were assessed at randomization and every 8 weeks until progression. HRQoL changes over time were described by: (i) mean changes from baseline at each time point, (ii) distribution of improved/stable/worse at 8 weeks and (iii) time to QoL deterioration (TTD), defined as the time from randomization to a worsening ≥ 10 points of global QoL in EORTC QLQC30. Mean changes were compared by a linear regression model, with baseline values as covariates. Proportion of improved/stable/worse was compared by Chi square test. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model were used for TTD estimation. Results: Of the 280 pts randomized, 198 (71%; 109/144 with PTX-RAM and 89/136 with FOX) and 133 (48%; 81/144 and 52/136) completed baseline and 8-weeks assessment of EORTC and EQ5D, respectively. Mean baseline scores of global HRQoL were 66.90 (standard deviation [SD] 20.71) with PTX-RAM and 70.97 (SD 19.39) with FOX. Global QoL at 8-weeks assessment was better with PTX-RAM versus FOX both in terms of mean changes from baseline (+2.17 vs -8.51, delta 10.68, p = 0.015) and in terms of proportion of improved/stable/worse (improved 24.7% vs 4.2%, stable 56.2% vs 64.6%, worse 19.2% vs 31.3%, p = 0.009). TTD was significantly longer for PTX-RAM versus FOX (median TTD 7.6 vs 3.8 months, HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.33-0.82; p = 0.005). Mean changes from baseline after 8 weeks for functional scales and symptoms of QLQC30 and QLQOG25 showed significant improvement for PTX-RAM vs FOX for role functioning (p = 0.006), nausea/vomiting (p = 0.002), pain (p = 0.016), appetite loss (p = 0.03) and dysphagia (p = 0.028); hair loss was worse with PTX-RAM (p = 0.024). VAS score from EQ5D was not significantly different between the two treatments for all the assessments. Conclusions: In pts with HER2-negative advanced G/GEJ cancer, PTX-RAM switch maintenance, beyond a significant benefit in PFS and OS, showed significant benefit in terms of HRQoL, reducing symptoms and delaying global QoL deterioration. Clinical trial information: NCT02934464 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT), Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Ospedale Santa Maria (IT), Presidio Ospedaliero (IT), Istituto Tumori Bari (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (IT), Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Cremona, University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.