The impact of prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT/ACT) on fruquintinib plus sintilimab outcomes in advanced endometrial cancer (EMC) patients with pMMR status: A subgroup analysis of FRUSICA-1.

5611 Background: FRUSICA-1 (NCT03903705) was an open-label, single-arm, pivotal phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib (F, a highly selective VEGFR inhibitor) plus sintilimab (S, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in previously treated advanced EMC patients (pts) with pMMR (proficient mismatch repair) status. The primary results of FRUSICA-1 have demonstrated encouraging efficacy (objective response rate [ORR]: 35.6%; median progression-free survival [PFS]: 9.5 mo; median overall survival [OS]: 21.3 mo) in the overall population (Wu X, et al; 2024 ASCO). In this updated exploratory analysis (data cutoff: May 15, 2024), we evaluated the association between prior NACT/ACT and clinical outcomes in this study. Methods: Pts who had histologically confirmed advanced EMC with pMMR status confirmed by central lab and had progression on 1 standard systemic therapy were eligible. They received F (5 mg QD, 2 weeks on/1 week off, orally) plus S (200 mg, IV, Q3W) in 21-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The efficacy subgroup analysis was performed by prior NACT/ACT (Yes vs No). Results: As of May 15, 2024, a total of 98 EMC pts with pMMR status were enrolled and received the treatment with the median follow-up of 22.0 mo (95%CI: 20.5, 23.7). Based on pts with or without prior NACT/ACT (Yes vs No = 47 pts vs 51 pts), the baseline demographics and disease characteristics were well balanced. Independent Review Committee (IRC)-assessed ORR (34.0% vs 31.4%) and disease control rate (DCR, 85.1% vs 82.4%) were comparable, respectively. Median duration of response (DoR) in pts with NACT/ACT was 11.1 mo while not reached for pts without NACT/ACT. Median PFS were 7.1 mo (95%CI: 4.7, 13.8) vs 9.5 mo (95%CI: 5.5, not estimable), respectively with two 95%CIs highly overlapped. The 6-mo PFS rates were also comparable at 56.8% vs 59.7%. Median OS pending maturity, the 18-mo OS rates were nearly identical (58.7% vs 59.1%). Conclusions: In this updated exploratory analysis of pts with advanced EMC enrolled in FRUSICA-1 study treated with F plus S, encouraging outcomes were achieved in the overall population, including patients who had received prior NACT/ACT and those who had not, with durable and clinically meaningful responses. Clinical trial information: NCT03903705 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.5611
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT/ACT) on fruquintinib plus sintilimab outcomes in advanced endometrial cancer (EMC) patients with pMMR status: A subgroup analysis of FRUSICA-1.

Danbo Wang, Tienan Yi, Hongmin Chen, Michael A. Shi et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

The impact of prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT/ACT) on fruquintinib plus sintilimab outcomes in advanced endometrial cancer (EMC) patients with pMMR status: A subgroup analysis of FRUSICA-1.

Danbo Wang, Tienan Yi, Hongmin Chen, Michael A. Shi, Ke Wang, Yumei Wu, Yuxian Bai, Ruifang An, Jieqing Zhang, Jing Wang, Jihong Liu, Guiling Li, Hongying Yang, Ke‐Ming Wang, Qi Zhou, Xiaohua Wu, Hanmei Lou, Kui Jiang, Yi‐Wen Huang, X. Li
article en

Abstract

5611 Background: FRUSICA-1 (NCT03903705) was an open-label, single-arm, pivotal phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib (F, a highly selective VEGFR inhibitor) plus sintilimab (S, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in previously treated advanced EMC patients (pts) with pMMR (proficient mismatch repair) status. The primary results of FRUSICA-1 have demonstrated encouraging efficacy (objective response rate [ORR]: 35.6%; median progression-free survival [PFS]: 9.5 mo; median overall survival [OS]: 21.3 mo) in the overall population (Wu X, et al; 2024 ASCO). In this updated exploratory analysis (data cutoff: May 15, 2024), we evaluated the association between prior NACT/ACT and clinical outcomes in this study. Methods: Pts who had histologically confirmed advanced EMC with pMMR status confirmed by central lab and had progression on 1 standard systemic therapy were eligible. They received F (5 mg QD, 2 weeks on/1 week off, orally) plus S (200 mg, IV, Q3W) in 21-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The efficacy subgroup analysis was performed by prior NACT/ACT (Yes vs No). Results: As of May 15, 2024, a total of 98 EMC pts with pMMR status were enrolled and received the treatment with the median follow-up of 22.0 mo (95%CI: 20.5, 23.7). Based on pts with or without prior NACT/ACT (Yes vs No = 47 pts vs 51 pts), the baseline demographics and disease characteristics were well balanced. Independent Review Committee (IRC)-assessed ORR (34.0% vs 31.4%) and disease control rate (DCR, 85.1% vs 82.4%) were comparable, respectively. Median duration of response (DoR) in pts with NACT/ACT was 11.1 mo while not reached for pts without NACT/ACT. Median PFS were 7.1 mo (95%CI: 4.7, 13.8) vs 9.5 mo (95%CI: 5.5, not estimable), respectively with two 95%CIs highly overlapped. The 6-mo PFS rates were also comparable at 56.8% vs 59.7%. Median OS pending maturity, the 18-mo OS rates were nearly identical (58.7% vs 59.1%). Conclusions: In this updated exploratory analysis of pts with advanced EMC enrolled in FRUSICA-1 study treated with F plus S, encouraging outcomes were achieved in the overall population, including patients who had received prior NACT/ACT and those who had not, with durable and clinically meaningful responses. Clinical trial information: NCT03903705 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Harbin Medical University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Chongqing University (CN), Guangxi Medical University (CN), Capital Medical University (CN), Dalian Medical University (CN), Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN), Xiangyang Central Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), Wuhan Union Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (CN), Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CN), Henan Cancer Hospital (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN), Chongqing Cancer Hospital (CN), Hubei Cancer Hospital (CN), Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute (CN), Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Innovent Biologics
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.