Effect of typeface complexity on automatic reading processes

The introduction of variable fonts widened the possibilities for font applications and increased the ease with which typographers could manage their designs. Variable fonts enable typographers to easily manipulate letter characteristics that exist on a spectrum such as weight, width, or deviation from the neutral letter form. However, this fluidity may also increase visual complexity, which may contribute to the disfluency effect. This study explores the impact of typeface complexity on automatic reading processes using the well-known Stroop Colour and Word task. We show that automatic reading can be negatively affected by typefaces with extremely complex features, but that moderately complex typefaces have little effect. This suggests hard to read typefaces do impair word reading (i.e. they are disfluent) but that skilled readers are able to tolerate a high degree of complexity. It also highlights the utility of cognitive tests for identifying typefaces that are difficult to read.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Visible Language
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34314/mt0mvk69
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Color perception and design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of typeface complexity on automatic reading processes

Sofie Beier, Indae Hwang, Jack Astley, Myra Thiessen et al.
1 citations
Visible Language
Color perception and design
2.44
article

Effect of typeface complexity on automatic reading processes

Sofie Beier, Indae Hwang, Jack Astley, Myra Thiessen, Hannah A. D. Keage
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The introduction of variable fonts widened the possibilities for font applications and increased the ease with which typographers could manage their designs. Variable fonts enable typographers to easily manipulate letter characteristics that exist on a spectrum such as weight, width, or deviation from the neutral letter form. However, this fluidity may also increase visual complexity, which may contribute to the disfluency effect. This study explores the impact of typeface complexity on automatic reading processes using the well-known Stroop Colour and Word task. We show that automatic reading can be negatively affected by typefaces with extremely complex features, but that moderately complex typefaces have little effect. This suggests hard to read typefaces do impair word reading (i.e. they are disfluent) but that skilled readers are able to tolerate a high degree of complexity. It also highlights the utility of cognitive tests for identifying typefaces that are difficult to read.

Visible LanguageVol. 56(3)
University of South Australia (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), Schools of Visual Arts, The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Color perception and design
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of typeface complexity on automatic reading processes — Sofie Beier, Indae Hwang, et al. · Visible Language (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS