Energy impact of integrative lighting: a systematic literature review

• Limited research exists on energy impacts of integrative lighting systems. • Up to 300 % increase in energy use can be observed. • Daylight integration minimizes energy increase, reducing it to just 5 %. • Efficient spatial lighting patterns further reduce energy use. • Light spectrum and controls may also support energy-efficient lighting design. Integrative lighting promoting circadian health has recently gained attention due to the increasing awareness of non-visual effects of light and advancements in lighting technology. However, reaching both visual and non-visual circadian targets in buildings may be challenging when considering energy use. Despite growing interest, most studies have focused on health benefits and individual design parameters, leaving the energy implications of integrative lighting insufficiently explored. This systematic literature review investigates the energy impact of implementing non-visual lighting requirements in buildings, with a specific focus on daily active occupants. The review identifies four factors affecting energy use: light quantity, light spectrum, spatial pattern, and timing. Although the energy impacts of integrative lighting have not been thoroughly investigated by literature, the findings suggest that light quantity is the primary factor affecting energy use. Reliance on electric lighting for non-visual targets can result in up to a 300% increase in energy use compared to lighting systems addressing visual targets only. The results also show that a greater emphasis on daylight utilization reduces the dependence on electric lighting, while meeting non-visual needs. Additionally, well-designed spatial patterns and appropriate adjustments in spectral power distribution can potentially improve energy efficiency of integrative lighting systems, hence lowering energy use. As overarching recommendations, this article advocates for greater integration of daylight into integrative lighting schemes, and for a general re-thinking of light distribution from electric lighting fixtures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115920
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy impact of integrative lighting: a systematic literature review

Mahmoud Taghizadeh, Pimkamol Mattsson, Marie-Claude Dubois, Niko Gentile
5 citations
Energy and Buildings
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
5.53
article

Energy impact of integrative lighting: a systematic literature review

Mahmoud Taghizadeh, Pimkamol Mattsson, Marie-Claude Dubois, Niko Gentile
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Limited research exists on energy impacts of integrative lighting systems. • Up to 300 % increase in energy use can be observed. • Daylight integration minimizes energy increase, reducing it to just 5 %. • Efficient spatial lighting patterns further reduce energy use. • Light spectrum and controls may also support energy-efficient lighting design. Integrative lighting promoting circadian health has recently gained attention due to the increasing awareness of non-visual effects of light and advancements in lighting technology. However, reaching both visual and non-visual circadian targets in buildings may be challenging when considering energy use. Despite growing interest, most studies have focused on health benefits and individual design parameters, leaving the energy implications of integrative lighting insufficiently explored. This systematic literature review investigates the energy impact of implementing non-visual lighting requirements in buildings, with a specific focus on daily active occupants. The review identifies four factors affecting energy use: light quantity, light spectrum, spatial pattern, and timing. Although the energy impacts of integrative lighting have not been thoroughly investigated by literature, the findings suggest that light quantity is the primary factor affecting energy use. Reliance on electric lighting for non-visual targets can result in up to a 300% increase in energy use compared to lighting systems addressing visual targets only. The results also show that a greater emphasis on daylight utilization reduces the dependence on electric lighting, while meeting non-visual needs. Additionally, well-designed spatial patterns and appropriate adjustments in spectral power distribution can potentially improve energy efficiency of integrative lighting systems, hence lowering energy use. As overarching recommendations, this article advocates for greater integration of daylight into integrative lighting schemes, and for a general re-thinking of light distribution from electric lighting fixtures.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 344
Lund University (SE)
Energimyndigheten
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.