Loss functions in regression models: Impact on profits and risk in day-ahead electricity trading

We study the impact of the loss function used to estimate the parameters of a regression-type model on profits and risk in day-ahead electricity trading. To provide practical insights, we consider a strategy that incorporates battery storage and includes realistic operating costs in the calculation of revenues. Using 2021-2024 data from the German market as the testing ground, we provide evidence that minimizing a loss function that combines absolute errors with a quadratic penalty for price spread predictions of the opposite sign is the preferred option. Forecasts based on the introduced directional loss function repeatedly and in the majority of cases yield trading decisions that outperform those based on predictions from models estimated using squared, absolute, percentage, or asymmetric losses, as measured by the Sharpe ratio and profits per trade. • Insights on how loss functions affect profits and risk in electricity trading. • The first study to consider realistic BESS operating costs in intraday trading. • A new loss function that penalizes price spread predictions of wrong sign. • This function leads to higher profits than MSE, MAE and sMAPE-based forecasts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108596
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Loss functions in regression models: Impact on profits and risk in day-ahead electricity trading

Tomasz Serafin, RafałWeron
3 citations
Energy Economics
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
2.19
article

Loss functions in regression models: Impact on profits and risk in day-ahead electricity trading

Tomasz Serafin, RafałWeron
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We study the impact of the loss function used to estimate the parameters of a regression-type model on profits and risk in day-ahead electricity trading. To provide practical insights, we consider a strategy that incorporates battery storage and includes realistic operating costs in the calculation of revenues. Using 2021-2024 data from the German market as the testing ground, we provide evidence that minimizing a loss function that combines absolute errors with a quadratic penalty for price spread predictions of the opposite sign is the preferred option. Forecasts based on the introduced directional loss function repeatedly and in the majority of cases yield trading decisions that outperform those based on predictions from models estimated using squared, absolute, percentage, or asymmetric losses, as measured by the Sharpe ratio and profits per trade. • Insights on how loss functions affect profits and risk in electricity trading. • The first study to consider realistic BESS operating costs in intraday trading. • A new loss function that penalizes price spread predictions of wrong sign. • This function leads to higher profits than MSE, MAE and sMAPE-based forecasts.

Energy EconomicsVol. 148
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.