Proteomic signatures of biofluid-derived extracellular vesicles for benign and malignant ovarian tumor differentiation, prognosis, and chemotherapy response prediction.

e17562 Background: Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are nano-sized particles that reflect the pathological state of their origin cells and serve as promising biomarkers for various tumor. In high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC), the most lethal ovarian cancer subtype, sEV proteomics offers significant potential for uncovering diagnostic markers, prognostic indicators, and therapeutic targets. Methods: Proteomic analyses of sEVs from plasma, urine, and ascites were conducted using 4D-label free mass spectrometry. sEV proteins specific to malignant tumors or linked to varying prognoses and chemotherapy responses were identified and analyzed through functional pathway studies, combined with single-cell sequencing data, to uncover their characteristics in biofluids. The diagnostic and prognostic potential of these altered sEV proteins in HGSC was also evaluated. Results: We identified 2,172 proteins in plasma-derived sEVs and 4,596 proteins in urine-derived sEVs across all patient samples. Principal component analysis of abundant proteins in plasma-derived sEVs clearly distinguished HGSC from benign diseases. Under integrated analysis of vesicle proteomics and single-cell transcriptomics, sEV proteins in plasma and urine samples from the malignant tumor group were predominantly secreted by tumor, endothelial, and stromal cells within the tumor microenvironment. In plasma-derived sEVs, proteins elevated in HGSC were enriched in pathways regulating the citrate cycle, complement and coagulation cascades, and ECM-receptor interaction. CDH5 and TGFB1, associated with tumor progression, showed higher levels in HGSC than borderline tumors and further increased in advanced compared to early HGSC. Notably, UBA6 was identified as a plasma-specific sEV protein unique to HGSC compared to borderline tumors and benign diseases. Additionally, MUC1 and CDH5 in plasma-derived sEVs effectively distinguished HGSC from benign cases, with ROC-AUC values of 0.96 and 0.91, respectively. Urine sEV proteomics revealed PTCD3 and F10 were higher in HGSC than benign disease, with AUC values of 0.95 and 0.89, distinguishing malignant tumors. Furthermore, GP2, CCNY, and VWF in plasma sEVs predicted chemotherapy resistance with ROC values of 0.93, 0.92, and 0.84, respectively, and were associated with shorter PFS. Similarly, VCP in ascites (ROC 0.94) and NOB1 in urine (ROC 0.96) strongly predicted chemotherapy resistance and were also linked to shorter PFS. Conclusions: SEVs from plasma, urine, and ascites, predominantly secreted by tumor and microenvironmental cells, serve as tumor-specific or -enriched biomarkers for HGSC. They enable non-invasive detection, prognosis, and therapy guidance by distinguishing HGSC and predicting chemotherapy resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e17562
Primary Topic
Extracellular vesicles in disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proteomic signatures of biofluid-derived extracellular vesicles for benign and malignant ovarian tumor differentiation, prognosis, and chemotherapy response prediction.

Yujing Qian, Xiaocui Zheng, Ziyi Li, Xipeng Wang
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Extracellular vesicles in disease
article

Proteomic signatures of biofluid-derived extracellular vesicles for benign and malignant ovarian tumor differentiation, prognosis, and chemotherapy response prediction.

Yujing Qian, Xiaocui Zheng, Ziyi Li, Xipeng Wang
article en

Abstract

e17562 Background: Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are nano-sized particles that reflect the pathological state of their origin cells and serve as promising biomarkers for various tumor. In high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC), the most lethal ovarian cancer subtype, sEV proteomics offers significant potential for uncovering diagnostic markers, prognostic indicators, and therapeutic targets. Methods: Proteomic analyses of sEVs from plasma, urine, and ascites were conducted using 4D-label free mass spectrometry. sEV proteins specific to malignant tumors or linked to varying prognoses and chemotherapy responses were identified and analyzed through functional pathway studies, combined with single-cell sequencing data, to uncover their characteristics in biofluids. The diagnostic and prognostic potential of these altered sEV proteins in HGSC was also evaluated. Results: We identified 2,172 proteins in plasma-derived sEVs and 4,596 proteins in urine-derived sEVs across all patient samples. Principal component analysis of abundant proteins in plasma-derived sEVs clearly distinguished HGSC from benign diseases. Under integrated analysis of vesicle proteomics and single-cell transcriptomics, sEV proteins in plasma and urine samples from the malignant tumor group were predominantly secreted by tumor, endothelial, and stromal cells within the tumor microenvironment. In plasma-derived sEVs, proteins elevated in HGSC were enriched in pathways regulating the citrate cycle, complement and coagulation cascades, and ECM-receptor interaction. CDH5 and TGFB1, associated with tumor progression, showed higher levels in HGSC than borderline tumors and further increased in advanced compared to early HGSC. Notably, UBA6 was identified as a plasma-specific sEV protein unique to HGSC compared to borderline tumors and benign diseases. Additionally, MUC1 and CDH5 in plasma-derived sEVs effectively distinguished HGSC from benign cases, with ROC-AUC values of 0.96 and 0.91, respectively. Urine sEV proteomics revealed PTCD3 and F10 were higher in HGSC than benign disease, with AUC values of 0.95 and 0.89, distinguishing malignant tumors. Furthermore, GP2, CCNY, and VWF in plasma sEVs predicted chemotherapy resistance with ROC values of 0.93, 0.92, and 0.84, respectively, and were associated with shorter PFS. Similarly, VCP in ascites (ROC 0.94) and NOB1 in urine (ROC 0.96) strongly predicted chemotherapy resistance and were also linked to shorter PFS. Conclusions: SEVs from plasma, urine, and ascites, predominantly secreted by tumor and microenvironmental cells, serve as tumor-specific or -enriched biomarkers for HGSC. They enable non-invasive detection, prognosis, and therapy guidance by distinguishing HGSC and predicting chemotherapy resistance.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), XinHua Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Extracellular vesicles in disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.