Transarterial chemoembolization combined with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

e16223 Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ,demonstrating a promising option. To compare the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab (TACE-Ate-Bev) or TACE combined with lenvatinib plus Sintilimab(TACE-Len-Sin) as first-line treatments for advanced HCC. Methods: We assessed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate(ORR), and adverse events between the TACE-Ate-Bev group (n = 108) and the TACE-Len-Sin group (n = 160) as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to minimize bias. Efficacy was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria. Results: After IPTW, the TACE-Ate-Bev group significantly extended the median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared to theTACE-Len-Sin group (mOS: 27.9 months vs. 17.03 months, P < 0.001; mPFS: 13.06 months vs. 8.23months, P < 0.001). A higher ORR was observed in TACE-Ate-Bev group, by either RECIST v1.1 or modified RECIST (37.03% vs 33.13%;50.0% vs 33.73%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 18 patients (16.7%) in TACE-Ate-Bev group and 28 patients (17.5%) in TACE-Len-Sin group.The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GB) was significantly higher in the TACE-Ate-Bev group compared to the TACE-Len-Sin group (10.8% vs. 6.3%). Notably, GB was significantly more frequent in patients with portal hypertension (PHT) compared to those without, in both the TACE-Bev-Ate group (28.2% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001) and the TACE-Len-Sin group (24.5% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: TACE-Ate-Bev demonstrated superior OS and PFS compared to TACE-Len-Sin as first-line treatment for advanced HCC, with an acceptable safety. Management of PHT in patients with advanced HCC is critical to optimizing patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16223
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ming Luo, Wei Bai, Huiru Liu, Guohong Han et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
1.32
article

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ming Luo, Wei Bai, Huiru Liu, Guohong Han, Haipeng Yu, Yawei Du, Yuexi Yu, Wei Zhang, Shuwen Zhang, Yiyan Zhang, Qiang Wu, Wenwen Zhu, Kaipeng Liu, Xuanchen Liu, Jihui Hao, Yu Hao, Yiming Huo, Wei Lü, Ningning Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

e16223 Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ,demonstrating a promising option. To compare the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab (TACE-Ate-Bev) or TACE combined with lenvatinib plus Sintilimab(TACE-Len-Sin) as first-line treatments for advanced HCC. Methods: We assessed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate(ORR), and adverse events between the TACE-Ate-Bev group (n = 108) and the TACE-Len-Sin group (n = 160) as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to minimize bias. Efficacy was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria. Results: After IPTW, the TACE-Ate-Bev group significantly extended the median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared to theTACE-Len-Sin group (mOS: 27.9 months vs. 17.03 months, P < 0.001; mPFS: 13.06 months vs. 8.23months, P < 0.001). A higher ORR was observed in TACE-Ate-Bev group, by either RECIST v1.1 or modified RECIST (37.03% vs 33.13%;50.0% vs 33.73%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 18 patients (16.7%) in TACE-Ate-Bev group and 28 patients (17.5%) in TACE-Len-Sin group.The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GB) was significantly higher in the TACE-Ate-Bev group compared to the TACE-Len-Sin group (10.8% vs. 6.3%). Notably, GB was significantly more frequent in patients with portal hypertension (PHT) compared to those without, in both the TACE-Bev-Ate group (28.2% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001) and the TACE-Len-Sin group (24.5% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: TACE-Ate-Bev demonstrated superior OS and PFS compared to TACE-Len-Sin as first-line treatment for advanced HCC, with an acceptable safety. Management of PHT in patients with advanced HCC is critical to optimizing patient outcomes.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN), Xijing Hospital (CN), Air Force Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.