Cadonilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy ± bevacizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: Subgroup analyses of COMPASSION-16.

5509 Background: The phase 3 COMPASSION-16 trial demonstrated statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits with cadonilimab plus chemotherapy ± bevacizumab in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (R/M CC). This analysis assessed efficacy in several key clinical subgroups. Methods: R/M CC pts who had no prior systemic treatment were randomized 1:1 to receive cadonilimab (10 mg/kg) or placebo Q3W plus platinum-based chemotherapy ± bevacizumab (15 mg/kg). The dual primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 assessed by blind independent central review and OS in the ITT population. Treatment effects on PFS and OS were evaluated in subgroups including age (&lt;65 or ≥65 years), bevacizumab use (yes or no), prior concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT; yes or no), metastatic disease at baseline (yes or no), PD-L1 CPS (&lt;1, ≥1, or ≥10), and platinum use (cisplatin or carboplatin). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated from an unstratified Cox model. Results: 445 patients were randomized (222 to the cadonilimab group and 223 to the placebo group). At the Apr 30, 2024 data cutoff, the median follow-up was 26 months. The addition of cadonilimab prolonged PFS and OS in all investigated subgroups (Table). Conclusions: Subgroup analyses of COMPASSION-16 showed that the addition of cadonilimab to chemotherapy ± bevacizumab improved PFS and OS across subgroups defined by age, bevacizumab use, prior CCRT, metastatic disease, PD-L1 CPS, and platinum use, consistent with results for the overall population. Cadonilimab plus standard treatment is a potential treatment option for patients with R/M CC. Clinical trial information: NCT04982237 . Subgroup (N) Median PFS (mo)Cadonilimab Median PFS (mo)Placebo PFS, HR (95% CI) Median OS (mo)Cadonilimab Median OS (mo)Placebo OS, HR (95% CI) &lt;65 yrs (369) 13.5 9.5 0.68 (0.52, 0.88) NR 25.3 0.69 (0.50, 0.95) ≥65 yrs (74) 12.0 7.4 0.39 (0.22, 0.68) 26.6 15.5 0.49 (0.27, 0.91) With bevacizumab (265) 15.1 11.5 0.78 (0.57, 1.06) NR NR 0.84 (0.56, 1.26) Without bevacizumab (180) 11.7 6.7 0.44 (0.31, 0.63) 28.8 15.1 0.50 (0.33, 0.75) CCRT, yes (215) 16.1 7.9 0.55 (0.39, 0.78) NR 22.8 0.54 (0.35, 0.82) CCRT, no (230) 12.0 8.5 0.67 (0.49, 0.93) 27.0 24.5 0.76 (0.52, 1.12) Metastatic, yes (323) 12.0 8.3 0.70 (0.54, 0.92) 28.8 25.3 0.73 (0.52, 1.02) Metastatic, no (122) NR 8.0 0.42 (0.25, 0.70) NR 17.6 0.48 (0.27, 0.86) PD-L1 CPS&lt;1 (116) 12.0 8.2 0.65 (0.42, 1.03) NR 25.3 0.77 (0.44, 1.34) PD-L1 CPS≥1 (312) 14.7 8.3 0.62 (0.47, 0.83) NR 22.7 0.69 (0.49, 0.97) PD-L1 CPS≥10 (180) 17.1 8.1 0.54 (0.37, 0.79) NR <jats:td colspan=

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.5509
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cadonilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy ± bevacizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: Subgroup analyses of COMPASSION-16.

Ying Tang, Hongyi Cai, Hui Zhang, Yifeng Wang et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
1.87
article

Cadonilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy ± bevacizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: Subgroup analyses of COMPASSION-16.

Ying Tang, Hongyi Cai, Hui Zhang, Yifeng Wang, Ke Wang, Dan Li, Ting Liu, Dapeng Li, Chunyan Wang, Guiling Li, Hongying Yang, Yu Xia, Yuzhi Li, Tao Wu, Xiaohua Wu, Hanmei Lou, Mei Pan, Yang Sun, Jing Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

5509 Background: The phase 3 COMPASSION-16 trial demonstrated statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits with cadonilimab plus chemotherapy ± bevacizumab in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (R/M CC). This analysis assessed efficacy in several key clinical subgroups. Methods: R/M CC pts who had no prior systemic treatment were randomized 1:1 to receive cadonilimab (10 mg/kg) or placebo Q3W plus platinum-based chemotherapy ± bevacizumab (15 mg/kg). The dual primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 assessed by blind independent central review and OS in the ITT population. Treatment effects on PFS and OS were evaluated in subgroups including age (&lt;65 or ≥65 years), bevacizumab use (yes or no), prior concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT; yes or no), metastatic disease at baseline (yes or no), PD-L1 CPS (&lt;1, ≥1, or ≥10), and platinum use (cisplatin or carboplatin). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated from an unstratified Cox model. Results: 445 patients were randomized (222 to the cadonilimab group and 223 to the placebo group). At the Apr 30, 2024 data cutoff, the median follow-up was 26 months. The addition of cadonilimab prolonged PFS and OS in all investigated subgroups (Table). Conclusions: Subgroup analyses of COMPASSION-16 showed that the addition of cadonilimab to chemotherapy ± bevacizumab improved PFS and OS across subgroups defined by age, bevacizumab use, prior CCRT, metastatic disease, PD-L1 CPS, and platinum use, consistent with results for the overall population. Cadonilimab plus standard treatment is a potential treatment option for patients with R/M CC. Clinical trial information: NCT04982237 . Subgroup (N) Median PFS (mo)Cadonilimab Median PFS (mo)Placebo PFS, HR (95% CI) Median OS (mo)Cadonilimab Median OS (mo)Placebo OS, HR (95% CI) &lt;65 yrs (369) 13.5 9.5 0.68 (0.52, 0.88) NR 25.3 0.69 (0.50, 0.95) ≥65 yrs (74) 12.0 7.4 0.39 (0.22, 0.68) 26.6 15.5 0.49 (0.27, 0.91) With bevacizumab (265) 15.1 11.5 0.78 (0.57, 1.06) NR NR 0.84 (0.56, 1.26) Without bevacizumab (180) 11.7 6.7 0.44 (0.31, 0.63) 28.8 15.1 0.50 (0.33, 0.75) CCRT, yes (215) 16.1 7.9 0.55 (0.39, 0.78) NR 22.8 0.54 (0.35, 0.82) CCRT, no (230) 12.0 8.5 0.67 (0.49, 0.93) 27.0 24.5 0.76 (0.52, 1.12) Metastatic, yes (323) 12.0 8.3 0.70 (0.54, 0.92) 28.8 25.3 0.73 (0.52, 1.02) Metastatic, no (122) NR 8.0 0.42 (0.25, 0.70) NR 17.6 0.48 (0.27, 0.86) PD-L1 CPS&lt;1 (116) 12.0 8.2 0.65 (0.42, 1.03) NR 25.3 0.77 (0.44, 1.34) PD-L1 CPS≥1 (312) 14.7 8.3 0.62 (0.47, 0.83) NR 22.7 0.69 (0.49, 0.97) PD-L1 CPS≥10 (180) 17.1 8.1 0.54 (0.37, 0.79) NR <jats:td colspan=

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Hebei Medical University (CN), Fujian Medical University (CN), Central South University (CN), Chongqing University (CN), Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (CN), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN), Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN), Gansu Provincial Hospital (CN), Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN), Zhujiang Hospital (CN), The First People's Hospital of Changde (CN), Wuhan Union Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College (CN), Chongqing Cancer Hospital (CN), Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN), Southern Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.