Online Public Opinion Risk Assessment Model Based on AHP

This paper proposes a risk assessment model of online public opinion based on Analytic Hierarchy Process( AHP). The aim is to quantify the risks associated with online public opinion and offer decision-making support for the management of online public opinion. This model breaks down complex online public opinion issues into multiple levels and factors. By using AHP, it combines qualitative and quantitative analysis to determine the relative weight of each factor, thereby enabling the accurate evaluation of online public opinion issues. The paper elaborates on the model construction process, including hierarchy design, judgment matrix construction, weight calculation, and consistency testing. It also validates the model through a large volume of real-world data. The experimental results indicate that the model exhibits high accuracy and practicality, providing a scientific and systematic approach to the risk assessment of online public opinion.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3728199.3728280
Primary Topic
Evaluation Methods in Various Fields
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online Public Opinion Risk Assessment Model Based on AHP

Shijun Zhang, Jian‐Dong Jiang, Tie Wang
Evaluation Methods in Various Fields
article

Online Public Opinion Risk Assessment Model Based on AHP

Shijun Zhang, Jian‐Dong Jiang, Tie Wang
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a risk assessment model of online public opinion based on Analytic Hierarchy Process( AHP). The aim is to quantify the risks associated with online public opinion and offer decision-making support for the management of online public opinion. This model breaks down complex online public opinion issues into multiple levels and factors. By using AHP, it combines qualitative and quantitative analysis to determine the relative weight of each factor, thereby enabling the accurate evaluation of online public opinion issues. The paper elaborates on the model construction process, including hierarchy design, judgment matrix construction, weight calculation, and consistency testing. It also validates the model through a large volume of real-world data. The experimental results indicate that the model exhibits high accuracy and practicality, providing a scientific and systematic approach to the risk assessment of online public opinion.

Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Evaluation Methods in Various Fields
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.