Performance Evaluation and Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Nine Reanalysis and Remote Sensing Evapotranspiration Products in China

Evapotranspiration (ET) is a critical component of the hydrological cycle. The eddy covariance data at 40 flux stations in different climatic regions in China were used to evaluate the accuracy of five reanalysis actual ET datasets (ERA5, ERA5-LAND, GLDAS-2.1, MERRA-2, TerraClimate) and four remote sensing estimation ET datasets (ETMonitor, GLEAM4.2a, PML_V2, SiTHv2), which are widely used by the hydrometeorological and climatological communities, in terms of the root mean square error, Pearson correlation coefficient, mean absolute deviation, and Taylor skill score. The results show that remote sensing products outperform reanalysis datasets. Among them, ETMonitor has the highest accuracy, followed by PML_V2 and SiTHv2. TerraClimate and MERRA-2 have the least agreement with the observations at flux sites across nearly all evaluation metrics. All products can capture the seasonality of ET in China, but underestimate ET in northwest China and overestimate ET in southern China throughout the year. We tried to merge three optimal data products (ETMonitor, PML_V2, and SiTHv2) using the triple collocation analysis method to improve the ET estimation, but the results showed that the improvement by the data fusion approach is marginal. The estimation of the multi-year average evapotranspiration during the period from 2001 to 2020 ranges from 397.8 mm/year (GLEAM4.2a) to 504.8 mm/year (ERA5-Land) in China. From 2001 to 2020, annual evapotranspiration in China generally increased, but with varying rates across different products. MERRA-2 showed the largest annual increase rate (3.71 mm/year), while SiTHv2 had the smallest (0.17 mm/year). There are no significant changes in the seasonality of ET by most ET products from 2001 to 2020, except for PML_V2 and SiTHv2, which indicate an increase in seasonality in terms of the evapotranspiration concentration index. This ET intercomparison addresses a key knowledge gap in terrestrial water flux quantification, aiding climate and hydrological research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17111881
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation and Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Nine Reanalysis and Remote Sensing Evapotranspiration Products in China

Tianqing Zhao, Wen Wang, Zhiwei Huo, Yujie Liu
7 citations
Remote Sensing
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
7.74
article

Performance Evaluation and Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Nine Reanalysis and Remote Sensing Evapotranspiration Products in China

Tianqing Zhao, Wen Wang, Zhiwei Huo, Yujie Liu
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET) is a critical component of the hydrological cycle. The eddy covariance data at 40 flux stations in different climatic regions in China were used to evaluate the accuracy of five reanalysis actual ET datasets (ERA5, ERA5-LAND, GLDAS-2.1, MERRA-2, TerraClimate) and four remote sensing estimation ET datasets (ETMonitor, GLEAM4.2a, PML_V2, SiTHv2), which are widely used by the hydrometeorological and climatological communities, in terms of the root mean square error, Pearson correlation coefficient, mean absolute deviation, and Taylor skill score. The results show that remote sensing products outperform reanalysis datasets. Among them, ETMonitor has the highest accuracy, followed by PML_V2 and SiTHv2. TerraClimate and MERRA-2 have the least agreement with the observations at flux sites across nearly all evaluation metrics. All products can capture the seasonality of ET in China, but underestimate ET in northwest China and overestimate ET in southern China throughout the year. We tried to merge three optimal data products (ETMonitor, PML_V2, and SiTHv2) using the triple collocation analysis method to improve the ET estimation, but the results showed that the improvement by the data fusion approach is marginal. The estimation of the multi-year average evapotranspiration during the period from 2001 to 2020 ranges from 397.8 mm/year (GLEAM4.2a) to 504.8 mm/year (ERA5-Land) in China. From 2001 to 2020, annual evapotranspiration in China generally increased, but with varying rates across different products. MERRA-2 showed the largest annual increase rate (3.71 mm/year), while SiTHv2 had the smallest (0.17 mm/year). There are no significant changes in the seasonality of ET by most ET products from 2001 to 2020, except for PML_V2 and SiTHv2, which indicate an increase in seasonality in terms of the evapotranspiration concentration index. This ET intercomparison addresses a key knowledge gap in terrestrial water flux quantification, aiding climate and hydrological research.

Remote SensingVol. 17(11)
Hohai University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
7.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.