Defending Hierarchy in the Name of Equality: The Statist Metamorphosis of China’s New Left

A significant voice in Chinese political debates since the 1990s, New Left intellectuals are known for their rejection of globalization and their criticism of social inequalities engendered by capitalism. In the twenty-first century, as their influence grows beyond intellectual circles into the realms of both political elites and digital mass media, the mainstream of New Left thought has turned from neo-Marxism toward statism and nationalism. This article tracks three trends in this development. First, New Left thinkers have increasingly considered (coercive) state capacity as an end in itself rather than a means to social equality, reflecting the state’s interest in maintaining stability and enforcing social control. Second, while criticizing “depoliticization,” the New Left’s proposed antidote has deemphasized political participation by the people and has focused on the ideologization of the ruling party, calling for top-down (rather than bottom-up) mobilization. Third, although the New Left came to fame by criticizing capitalism, their target of criticism has shifted from capitalism as a global institution to the “West” as a “civilizational” concept, substituting a return to “traditional” values for their previous goal of equality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The China Journal
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/736346
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defending Hierarchy in the Name of Equality: The Statist Metamorphosis of China’s New Left

Clyde Yicheng Wang
The China Journal
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

Defending Hierarchy in the Name of Equality: The Statist Metamorphosis of China’s New Left

Clyde Yicheng Wang
article en

Abstract

A significant voice in Chinese political debates since the 1990s, New Left intellectuals are known for their rejection of globalization and their criticism of social inequalities engendered by capitalism. In the twenty-first century, as their influence grows beyond intellectual circles into the realms of both political elites and digital mass media, the mainstream of New Left thought has turned from neo-Marxism toward statism and nationalism. This article tracks three trends in this development. First, New Left thinkers have increasingly considered (coercive) state capacity as an end in itself rather than a means to social equality, reflecting the state’s interest in maintaining stability and enforcing social control. Second, while criticizing “depoliticization,” the New Left’s proposed antidote has deemphasized political participation by the people and has focused on the ideologization of the ruling party, calling for top-down (rather than bottom-up) mobilization. Third, although the New Left came to fame by criticizing capitalism, their target of criticism has shifted from capitalism as a global institution to the “West” as a “civilizational” concept, substituting a return to “traditional” values for their previous goal of equality.

The China JournalVol. 94
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defending Hierarchy in the Name of Equality: The Statist Metamorphosis of China’s New Left — Clyde Yicheng Wang · The China Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS