Comparative outcomes of systemic therapy vs. locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis.

e16317 Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents a significant challenge, with treatment options including locoregional therapies and systemic therapies. This study evaluates the outcomes of these treatments in HCC patients with PVT. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX database from 2010 to 2020. A total of 268 patients with HCC and PVT were included. After matching, 134 patients received locoregional therapies (TACE or TARE), and 134 received systemic therapy (sorafenib and Lenvatinib). Results: After matching, the Locoregional Therapy cohort included 134 patients with a mean age of 71.2 ± 8.1 years, and 63.6% were male. Ethnicity distribution was 55.3% not Hispanic or Latino (n = 74), 52.8% White (n = 78), and 9.7% Black (n = 13). The Systemic Therapy cohort included 134 patients with a mean age of 70.8 ± 8.5 years, and 62.7% were male. Ethnicity distribution in this group was 57.5% not Hispanic or Latino (n = 77), 47.8% White (n = 64), and 15.0% Black (n = 20). Over a follow-up period exceeding 5 years, the median follow-up was shorter in the Systemic Therapy group (255 days; IQR: 460 days) compared to the Locoregional Therapies group (1,029.5 days; IQR: 1,488 days). Median survival probabilities at the end of follow-up were significantly lower in the Systemic Therapy group (22.794%) compared to the Locoregional Therapies group (54.491%), with a hazard ratio of 0.3 (95% CI: 0.209–0.431; p = 0.0002). Secondary outcomes analysis revealed that Locoregional Therapies were associated with increased risks of gastrointestinal bleeding (HR: 1.183, 95% CI: 0.596–2.349, p = 0.0189) and acute hepatic failure (HR: 1.496, 95% CI: 0.891–2.514, p = 0.0141). However, they were linked to a reduced risk of hepatic encephalopathy (HR: 0.554, 95% CI: 0.278–1.104, p = 0.0386) compared to Systemic Therapy. Conclusions: Locoregional Therapies demonstrated longer follow-up and improved survival but increased risks of GI bleeding and hepatic failure, while reducing hepatic encephalopathy risk compared to Systemic Therapy over 5 years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16317
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative outcomes of systemic therapy vs. locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis.

Nagihan Orhun, Islam Rajab, Mohamed S. Elgendy, Abdallah Hussein
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Comparative outcomes of systemic therapy vs. locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis.

Nagihan Orhun, Islam Rajab, Mohamed S. Elgendy, Abdallah Hussein
article en

Abstract

e16317 Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents a significant challenge, with treatment options including locoregional therapies and systemic therapies. This study evaluates the outcomes of these treatments in HCC patients with PVT. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX database from 2010 to 2020. A total of 268 patients with HCC and PVT were included. After matching, 134 patients received locoregional therapies (TACE or TARE), and 134 received systemic therapy (sorafenib and Lenvatinib). Results: After matching, the Locoregional Therapy cohort included 134 patients with a mean age of 71.2 ± 8.1 years, and 63.6% were male. Ethnicity distribution was 55.3% not Hispanic or Latino (n = 74), 52.8% White (n = 78), and 9.7% Black (n = 13). The Systemic Therapy cohort included 134 patients with a mean age of 70.8 ± 8.5 years, and 62.7% were male. Ethnicity distribution in this group was 57.5% not Hispanic or Latino (n = 77), 47.8% White (n = 64), and 15.0% Black (n = 20). Over a follow-up period exceeding 5 years, the median follow-up was shorter in the Systemic Therapy group (255 days; IQR: 460 days) compared to the Locoregional Therapies group (1,029.5 days; IQR: 1,488 days). Median survival probabilities at the end of follow-up were significantly lower in the Systemic Therapy group (22.794%) compared to the Locoregional Therapies group (54.491%), with a hazard ratio of 0.3 (95% CI: 0.209–0.431; p = 0.0002). Secondary outcomes analysis revealed that Locoregional Therapies were associated with increased risks of gastrointestinal bleeding (HR: 1.183, 95% CI: 0.596–2.349, p = 0.0189) and acute hepatic failure (HR: 1.496, 95% CI: 0.891–2.514, p = 0.0141). However, they were linked to a reduced risk of hepatic encephalopathy (HR: 0.554, 95% CI: 0.278–1.104, p = 0.0386) compared to Systemic Therapy. Conclusions: Locoregional Therapies demonstrated longer follow-up and improved survival but increased risks of GI bleeding and hepatic failure, while reducing hepatic encephalopathy risk compared to Systemic Therapy over 5 years.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Tanta University (EG), Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center (US), St. Joseph’s University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.