Are reads required? High-precision variant calling from bacterial genome assemblies

Accurate nucleotide variant calling is essential in microbial genomics, particularly for outbreak tracking and phylogenetics. This study evaluates variant calls derived from genome assemblies compared to traditional read-based variant-calling methods, using seven closely related <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> isolates sequenced on Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies platforms. By benchmarking multiple assembly and variant-calling pipelines against a ground truth dataset, we found that read-based methods consistently achieved high accuracy. Assembly-based approaches performed well in some cases but were highly dependent on assembly quality, as errors in the assembly led to false-positive variant calls. These findings underscore the need for improved assembly techniques before the potential benefits of assembly-based variant calling (such as reduced computational requirements and simpler data management) can be realized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Access Microbiology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.001025.v3
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are reads required? High-precision variant calling from bacterial genome assemblies

Louise M. Judd, Ian R. Monk, Timothy P. Stinear, Ryan R. Wick
Access Microbiology
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

Are reads required? High-precision variant calling from bacterial genome assemblies

Louise M. Judd, Ian R. Monk, Timothy P. Stinear, Ryan R. Wick
article en

Abstract

Accurate nucleotide variant calling is essential in microbial genomics, particularly for outbreak tracking and phylogenetics. This study evaluates variant calls derived from genome assemblies compared to traditional read-based variant-calling methods, using seven closely related <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> isolates sequenced on Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies platforms. By benchmarking multiple assembly and variant-calling pipelines against a ground truth dataset, we found that read-based methods consistently achieved high accuracy. Assembly-based approaches performed well in some cases but were highly dependent on assembly quality, as errors in the assembly led to false-positive variant calls. These findings underscore the need for improved assembly techniques before the potential benefits of assembly-based variant calling (such as reduced computational requirements and simpler data management) can be realized.

Access MicrobiologyVol. 7(5)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Peter Doherty Institute (AU)
Australian Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are reads required? High-precision variant calling from bacterial genome assemblies — Louise M. Judd, Ian R. Monk, et al. · Access Microbiology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS