Ethnic disparities in clinical trials for FDA-approved drugs in breast cancer: A post-COVID era analysis (2020-2024).

e13759 Background: Despite advances in cancer treatment, racial and ethnic minorities remain significantly underrepresented in cancer research, particularly in clinical trials. This underrepresentation raises concerns about the transferability of findings to diverse patient populations as well as equitable treatment outcomes. This study evaluates racial representation in breast cancer clinical trials supporting FDA-approved treatments since 2020. Methods: We analyzed racial representation in breast cancer clinical trials by examining data from 9 industry-sponsored trials, encompassing 9,688 patients. Racial distribution data were obtained from these trials, and SEER incidence rates were used to determine expected participation proportions. A chi-square goodness-of-fit test was performed to examine disparities between observed and expected representation among White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic populations. P-values were calculated to assess the statistical significance of these differences. Results: Out of a total of 16 industry trials reviewed, 6 (37.5%) did not present any race data, 1 trial presented white vs non-white, and none presented data on Hispanic participants. Among the nine trials reporting race, White participants were overrepresented (70.7%, p < 0.0001), Black participants were significantly underrepresented (2.35%, p < 0.0001), and Asian participants were also overrepresented but to a lesser extent ( p < 0.0001). Some of the trials were international and domestic. Conclusions: Our findings highlight persistent racial disparities in breast cancer clinical trials, with significant underrepresentation of Black participants and a complete lack of Hispanic-specific data. Lack of diversity in clinical trials threatens the applicability of these treatments across different populations, as well as raises concerns about equitable access to the latest advancements in cancer care. Enhancing recruitment strategies, standardizing race and ethnicity reporting, and establishing policy-driven diversity targets are key steps toward ensuring clinical trials more accurately represent the populations they aim to serve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e13759
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethnic disparities in clinical trials for FDA-approved drugs in breast cancer: A post-COVID era analysis (2020-2024).

Oleg Gligich, Arnold Blaustein, Mike Cusnir, Evelyn Goya Balaguer et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Ethnic disparities in clinical trials for FDA-approved drugs in breast cancer: A post-COVID era analysis (2020-2024).

Oleg Gligich, Arnold Blaustein, Mike Cusnir, Evelyn Goya Balaguer, Bruno R. Bastos, F. Poli, Jacqueline C. Barrientos, Michael A. Schwartz, Yelida Brauchle
article en

Abstract

e13759 Background: Despite advances in cancer treatment, racial and ethnic minorities remain significantly underrepresented in cancer research, particularly in clinical trials. This underrepresentation raises concerns about the transferability of findings to diverse patient populations as well as equitable treatment outcomes. This study evaluates racial representation in breast cancer clinical trials supporting FDA-approved treatments since 2020. Methods: We analyzed racial representation in breast cancer clinical trials by examining data from 9 industry-sponsored trials, encompassing 9,688 patients. Racial distribution data were obtained from these trials, and SEER incidence rates were used to determine expected participation proportions. A chi-square goodness-of-fit test was performed to examine disparities between observed and expected representation among White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic populations. P-values were calculated to assess the statistical significance of these differences. Results: Out of a total of 16 industry trials reviewed, 6 (37.5%) did not present any race data, 1 trial presented white vs non-white, and none presented data on Hispanic participants. Among the nine trials reporting race, White participants were overrepresented (70.7%, p < 0.0001), Black participants were significantly underrepresented (2.35%, p < 0.0001), and Asian participants were also overrepresented but to a lesser extent ( p < 0.0001). Some of the trials were international and domestic. Conclusions: Our findings highlight persistent racial disparities in breast cancer clinical trials, with significant underrepresentation of Black participants and a complete lack of Hispanic-specific data. Lack of diversity in clinical trials threatens the applicability of these treatments across different populations, as well as raises concerns about equitable access to the latest advancements in cancer care. Enhancing recruitment strategies, standardizing race and ethnicity reporting, and establishing policy-driven diversity targets are key steps toward ensuring clinical trials more accurately represent the populations they aim to serve.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Mount Sinai Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.