Unveiling the impact of traditional sourdough propagation methods on the microbiological, biochemical, sensory, and technological properties of sourdough and bread: a comprehensive first study

• Sourdough can be propagated according to four traditional methods. • Microbial and biochemical dynamics are affected by different propagation methods. • Sourdoughs propagated in water are characterized by a more complex aromatic profile. • Breads retain key biochemical characteristics of corresponding sourdoughs. • Shorter bread leavening times attenuate some features provided by the sourdoughs. In the last thirty years, the factors driving the establishment and composition of the sourdough biota have been deeply studied. Nevertheless, to date, no study has ever evaluated the biochemical and microbial dynamics of sourdoughs propagated using the different traditional methods integrated into procedural back-slopping practices worldwide. A mature type I sourdough was propagated for 10 days according to four managing conditions ( Milanese, In Water, Free and Piedmontese ) entailing incubations in a jute sack, submerged in water, in a jar or a combination of them. Sourdoughs obtained under the different conditions (and corresponding breads) were extensively characterized. When processing parameters modified the sourdough environment, the microbial community changed. In the first days of propagation Fructilactobacillus sanfranciscensis was the main dominant species regardless of the type of propagation, remaining present in all sourdoughs, especially those maintained in a jar. Differences among the propagation methods emerged from the biochemical analysis. Sourdoughs propagated in water exhibited higher titratable acidity, mainly due to the acetic acid produced, and were characterized by a more complex aromatic profile which differentiated them from the others. Biochemical features of breads mainly reflected those of the corresponding sourdough, whereas nutritional (protein digestibility and glycemic index) and technological (texture profile, colorimetric coordinates) features were hardly affected by the propagation method. Thus, investigation on the effect of the variation of the ecological determinants within the same propagation methods and their role in the definition of sourdough potential could be the subject of further studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Food Research
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2025.101037
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Food composition and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling the impact of traditional sourdough propagation methods on the microbiological, biochemical, sensory, and technological properties of sourdough and bread: a comprehensive first study

Giuseppe Perri, Carlo Giuseppe Rizzello, Giuseppe Celano, Erica Pontonio et al.
1 citations
Applied Food Research
Food composition and properties
1.12
article

Unveiling the impact of traditional sourdough propagation methods on the microbiological, biochemical, sensory, and technological properties of sourdough and bread: a comprehensive first study

Giuseppe Perri, Carlo Giuseppe Rizzello, Giuseppe Celano, Erica Pontonio, Michela Verni, Maria Piera Calasso
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Sourdough can be propagated according to four traditional methods. • Microbial and biochemical dynamics are affected by different propagation methods. • Sourdoughs propagated in water are characterized by a more complex aromatic profile. • Breads retain key biochemical characteristics of corresponding sourdoughs. • Shorter bread leavening times attenuate some features provided by the sourdoughs. In the last thirty years, the factors driving the establishment and composition of the sourdough biota have been deeply studied. Nevertheless, to date, no study has ever evaluated the biochemical and microbial dynamics of sourdoughs propagated using the different traditional methods integrated into procedural back-slopping practices worldwide. A mature type I sourdough was propagated for 10 days according to four managing conditions ( Milanese, In Water, Free and Piedmontese ) entailing incubations in a jute sack, submerged in water, in a jar or a combination of them. Sourdoughs obtained under the different conditions (and corresponding breads) were extensively characterized. When processing parameters modified the sourdough environment, the microbial community changed. In the first days of propagation Fructilactobacillus sanfranciscensis was the main dominant species regardless of the type of propagation, remaining present in all sourdoughs, especially those maintained in a jar. Differences among the propagation methods emerged from the biochemical analysis. Sourdoughs propagated in water exhibited higher titratable acidity, mainly due to the acetic acid produced, and were characterized by a more complex aromatic profile which differentiated them from the others. Biochemical features of breads mainly reflected those of the corresponding sourdough, whereas nutritional (protein digestibility and glycemic index) and technological (texture profile, colorimetric coordinates) features were hardly affected by the propagation method. Thus, investigation on the effect of the variation of the ecological determinants within the same propagation methods and their role in the definition of sourdough potential could be the subject of further studies.

Applied Food ResearchVol. 5(1)
University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Food composition and properties
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.