Breast cancer survivors' perspectives on a clinical decision tool to facilitate individualized exercise prescriptions within clinical settings.

e13715 Background: Current clinical guidelines recommend that clinicians provide individualized exercise prescriptions to cancer survivors. However, there are no clinical decision tools to support individualized exercise prescriptions considering individual clinical and demographic characteristics of breast cancer survivors. We aimed to gather breast cancer survivors’ perspectives on a prototype of a clinical decision tool to support individualized exercise prescriptions in clinical settings. Methods: A racially and ethnically diverse sample of breast cancer survivors across the U.S. were recruited to complete an online survey. Survey items were adapted from validated pre-existing instruments and refined via cognitive interviews with survivors and healthcare providers. Within the survey, survivors were presented with images of a prototype of the tool with an accompanying explanation of the tool’s potential functionality. The tool prototype was developed with input from breast cancer survivors, mathematic modelers, exercise specialists, and clinicians according to the Collaborative Deliberation Model. The tool was designed to generate breast cancer outcomes associated with various levels of exercise based on individual characteristics of the breast cancer survivors. Survivors were asked to rate the extent to which they agreed that: (I) the tool would be useful; (II) what they would use the tool for (e.g., education); and (III), the tool should include certain characteristics (e.g., exercise benefits). The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Ninety-eight breast cancer survivors responded to the survey. Most agreed that a tool would be useful (84.7%) and increase their confidence to discuss exercise with a healthcare provider (74.5%). The highest agreement for tool uses was found for education (84.1%) and encouragement to exercise (79.3%). Improving the ability to do everyday tasks (74.0%), quality-of-life (72.6%), and energy (71.4%) were rated as the top exercise benefits to include in a tool. Agreement on tool usefulness, uses, and tool characteristics varied by breast cancer survivors’ demographic, clinical, and contextual characteristics. Conclusions: This evidence-based clinical decision tool offering individualized exercise prescriptions may help diverse breast cancer survivors engage in discussions and shared decision-making about exercise with healthcare providers in clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e13715
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breast cancer survivors' perspectives on a clinical decision tool to facilitate individualized exercise prescriptions within clinical settings.

Oliver W.A. Wilson, Laura Q. Rogers, Ilse Rivera, Wendy Demark‐Wahnefried et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Breast cancer survivors' perspectives on a clinical decision tool to facilitate individualized exercise prescriptions within clinical settings.

Oliver W.A. Wilson, Laura Q. Rogers, Ilse Rivera, Wendy Demark‐Wahnefried, Jinani Jayasekera, Kaitlyn M. Wojcik, Richard L. Street, Rachelle Brick, Kosuke Tamura, Eleanor M. Kerr, Jacob Schneider, E Tian
article en

Abstract

e13715 Background: Current clinical guidelines recommend that clinicians provide individualized exercise prescriptions to cancer survivors. However, there are no clinical decision tools to support individualized exercise prescriptions considering individual clinical and demographic characteristics of breast cancer survivors. We aimed to gather breast cancer survivors’ perspectives on a prototype of a clinical decision tool to support individualized exercise prescriptions in clinical settings. Methods: A racially and ethnically diverse sample of breast cancer survivors across the U.S. were recruited to complete an online survey. Survey items were adapted from validated pre-existing instruments and refined via cognitive interviews with survivors and healthcare providers. Within the survey, survivors were presented with images of a prototype of the tool with an accompanying explanation of the tool’s potential functionality. The tool prototype was developed with input from breast cancer survivors, mathematic modelers, exercise specialists, and clinicians according to the Collaborative Deliberation Model. The tool was designed to generate breast cancer outcomes associated with various levels of exercise based on individual characteristics of the breast cancer survivors. Survivors were asked to rate the extent to which they agreed that: (I) the tool would be useful; (II) what they would use the tool for (e.g., education); and (III), the tool should include certain characteristics (e.g., exercise benefits). The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Ninety-eight breast cancer survivors responded to the survey. Most agreed that a tool would be useful (84.7%) and increase their confidence to discuss exercise with a healthcare provider (74.5%). The highest agreement for tool uses was found for education (84.1%) and encouragement to exercise (79.3%). Improving the ability to do everyday tasks (74.0%), quality-of-life (72.6%), and energy (71.4%) were rated as the top exercise benefits to include in a tool. Agreement on tool usefulness, uses, and tool characteristics varied by breast cancer survivors’ demographic, clinical, and contextual characteristics. Conclusions: This evidence-based clinical decision tool offering individualized exercise prescriptions may help diverse breast cancer survivors engage in discussions and shared decision-making about exercise with healthcare providers in clinical settings.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
National Institutes of Health (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (US), Ripple (United States) (US), Texas A&M University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.