Platinum or non-platinum therapy in post-olaparib recurrent ovarian cancer: Analysis in matched cohorts.

5588 Background: Due to potential cross-resistance mechanisms efficacy of platinum agents may be dramatically reduced in patients with ovarian cancer which progressed during maintenance therapy with PARP-inhibitors. We conducted this study to examine whether administration of platinum compounds has clinical value in post-olaparib setting of treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer treatment. Methods: This was a single center retrospective study in matched cohorts. We selected ovarian cancer patients from N.N. Blokhin NMRCO ovarian cancer who were treated in 2014-2024 years for any FIGO stage high-grade serous or endometrioid advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and progressed during olaparib maintenance therapy. Patients were treated with standard platinum-based or non-platinum chemotherapy for recurrent advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Cardinality matching was considered to ensure adequate balancing of the study arms. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with platinum-based and non-platinum chemotherapy. Overall survival was a secondary endpoint. Results: Cardinality matching with 1:2 ratio resulted in 126 matched patients for further analysis. Groups were well balanced without any significant differences in baseline characteristics. Median age in both treatment arms was 50 years with no differences in patients’ age, risk groups, prevalence of BRCA-mutations, duration of olaparib therapy and platinum-free interval. With a median follow up of 7.4 mo. median PFS was 6.0 in the non-platinum chemotherapy arm and 6.5 mo. in the platinum-based therapy arm (HR 1.17; 95% CI 0.77-1.77; p=0.46). Estimated 1-year PFS was 13.1% and 8.3%, respectively. Median OS was 21.3 mo. and 23.1 mo. in platinum-based chemotherapy arm and non-platinum arm (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.55-1.76; p=0.96). Subgroup analyses revealed no heterogeneity in therapy efficacy. Conclusions: Our study suggest no additional benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy in post-olaparib ovarian cancer, further prospective trials are warranted to find optimal therapeutic approaches for these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.5588
Primary Topic
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Platinum or non-platinum therapy in post-olaparib recurrent ovarian cancer: Analysis in matched cohorts.

А. Н. Луд, Sergei Tjulandin, А. А. Rumyantsev, И. А. Покатаев et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
article

Platinum or non-platinum therapy in post-olaparib recurrent ovarian cancer: Analysis in matched cohorts.

А. Н. Луд, Sergei Tjulandin, А. А. Rumyantsev, И. А. Покатаев, М. Yu. Fedyanin, Е. А. Глазкова
article en

Abstract

5588 Background: Due to potential cross-resistance mechanisms efficacy of platinum agents may be dramatically reduced in patients with ovarian cancer which progressed during maintenance therapy with PARP-inhibitors. We conducted this study to examine whether administration of platinum compounds has clinical value in post-olaparib setting of treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer treatment. Methods: This was a single center retrospective study in matched cohorts. We selected ovarian cancer patients from N.N. Blokhin NMRCO ovarian cancer who were treated in 2014-2024 years for any FIGO stage high-grade serous or endometrioid advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and progressed during olaparib maintenance therapy. Patients were treated with standard platinum-based or non-platinum chemotherapy for recurrent advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Cardinality matching was considered to ensure adequate balancing of the study arms. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with platinum-based and non-platinum chemotherapy. Overall survival was a secondary endpoint. Results: Cardinality matching with 1:2 ratio resulted in 126 matched patients for further analysis. Groups were well balanced without any significant differences in baseline characteristics. Median age in both treatment arms was 50 years with no differences in patients’ age, risk groups, prevalence of BRCA-mutations, duration of olaparib therapy and platinum-free interval. With a median follow up of 7.4 mo. median PFS was 6.0 in the non-platinum chemotherapy arm and 6.5 mo. in the platinum-based therapy arm (HR 1.17; 95% CI 0.77-1.77; p=0.46). Estimated 1-year PFS was 13.1% and 8.3%, respectively. Median OS was 21.3 mo. and 23.1 mo. in platinum-based chemotherapy arm and non-platinum arm (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.55-1.76; p=0.96). Subgroup analyses revealed no heterogeneity in therapy efficacy. Conclusions: Our study suggest no additional benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy in post-olaparib ovarian cancer, further prospective trials are warranted to find optimal therapeutic approaches for these patients.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RU), Moscow City Oncology Hospital №62 (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.