Analysis of factors affecting aesthetic outcomes and safety in breast-conserving surgery: A multicentre prospective cohort study.

e12569 Background: Breast conservation surgery (BCS) has gradually become the mainstream surgical approach for breast cancer; however, few studies have explored which factors influence the aesthetic outcome, complications, and tumor safety after BCS. This study aims to compare the factors affecting the aesthetics and safety of breast conservation surgery in a multicenter prospective breast cancer cohort. Methods: Women from a prospective, multicenter breast cancer cohort who underwent BCS were included. Aesthetic scores (AIS and Breast-Q scores) were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and various postoperative complications, perioperative parameters such as margins, and long-term follow-up indicators including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were also assessed. Results: A total of 701 individuals were ultimately included in the study, with a median follow-up time of 30.5 month. Among them, 398 (56.8%) underwent single-port non-liposuction endoscopic surgery, 401 (57.2%) had areolar incisions, and 405 (57.7%) had tumors located more than 2 cm from the nipple. Our findings revealed that non-endoscopic surgery and non-circumareolar incision provided worse breast aesthetic outcomes compared to endoscopic groups (12 months-AIS [effect size: -1.34; 95% CI: -1.70 to -0.99]) and circumareolar incision(12 months-AIS [effect size: -1.20; 95% CI: -0.55 to -1.86]), as well as similar postoperative complications, recurrence, and survival. Additionally, tumors located farther from the nipple (12 months-AIS [effect size: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.80]) also demonstrated better aesthetic outcomes and comparable safety profiles. Conclusions: Endoscopic breast-conserving surgery and areolar incisions can increase postoperative breast aesthetics and patient satisfaction without compromising complications and oncological safety, providing guidance for clinical decision-making. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100043403 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e12569
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of factors affecting aesthetic outcomes and safety in breast-conserving surgery: A multicentre prospective cohort study.

Binxu Qiu, Jie Chen, Zhihao Zhang
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Digital Imaging in Medicine
article

Analysis of factors affecting aesthetic outcomes and safety in breast-conserving surgery: A multicentre prospective cohort study.

Binxu Qiu, Jie Chen, Zhihao Zhang
article en

Abstract

e12569 Background: Breast conservation surgery (BCS) has gradually become the mainstream surgical approach for breast cancer; however, few studies have explored which factors influence the aesthetic outcome, complications, and tumor safety after BCS. This study aims to compare the factors affecting the aesthetics and safety of breast conservation surgery in a multicenter prospective breast cancer cohort. Methods: Women from a prospective, multicenter breast cancer cohort who underwent BCS were included. Aesthetic scores (AIS and Breast-Q scores) were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and various postoperative complications, perioperative parameters such as margins, and long-term follow-up indicators including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were also assessed. Results: A total of 701 individuals were ultimately included in the study, with a median follow-up time of 30.5 month. Among them, 398 (56.8%) underwent single-port non-liposuction endoscopic surgery, 401 (57.2%) had areolar incisions, and 405 (57.7%) had tumors located more than 2 cm from the nipple. Our findings revealed that non-endoscopic surgery and non-circumareolar incision provided worse breast aesthetic outcomes compared to endoscopic groups (12 months-AIS [effect size: -1.34; 95% CI: -1.70 to -0.99]) and circumareolar incision(12 months-AIS [effect size: -1.20; 95% CI: -0.55 to -1.86]), as well as similar postoperative complications, recurrence, and survival. Additionally, tumors located farther from the nipple (12 months-AIS [effect size: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.80]) also demonstrated better aesthetic outcomes and comparable safety profiles. Conclusions: Endoscopic breast-conserving surgery and areolar incisions can increase postoperative breast aesthetics and patient satisfaction without compromising complications and oncological safety, providing guidance for clinical decision-making. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100043403 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Digital Imaging in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.