Mammographic screening and time to breast cancer diagnosis among immigrants and long-term residents in Ontario.

e12572 Background: Breast Cancer is the most common in women globally and among Canadian women. We explored differences in screening rates and the time to breast cancer (BC) diagnosis among immigrants and long-term residents in Ontario). Methods: We calculated the annual proportion of Ontario women aged 50 – 75 up-to-date with mammography from January 2012 to 2020 and assessed trends using negative binomial regression, adjusting for immigration status, age, marginalization quintiles, and resource utilization. For BC diagnosis, we identified women aged 18-75 from the Ontario Cancer Registry (2012-2019). We matched long-term residents to immigrants by age, stage, and year at diagnosis and modelled time to diagnosis with linear regression. Results: The percentage of women up-to-date with mammographic screening ranged from 50% in 2012 to 52% in 2020 for immigrants and 61.5% in 2012 to 60.1% in 2020 for long-term residents. The Cochran-Armitage trend test over the study period was p = 0.79. The median time to diagnosis was 28 days (IQR 16-59) for long-term residents and 31 days (IQR 17-64) for immigrants. The range for both groups of women was 1-359 days, and over 10% of women in both had a diagnostic interval above 135 days (90 th percentile). We examined the stage distribution for the study population before matching and found that slightly more immigrants were diagnosed in stages two and three compared to long-term residents (Stage 2 (34.3% vs 37.4%), Stage 3(12.3% vs 14.3%) p = < .0001) and overall, more immigrants were diagnosed with stages 2,3 than long term residents (51.7% vs 46.6% p = < .001) but Stage 4 disease was similar for both groups (4.7% vs 5% p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Immigrants have significantly (26%) lower rates of up-to-date mammography and longer (1.2 days) diagnostic intervals. We found a slightly higher prevalence of stages two and three at diagnosis. The variation within both strata is enormous, but the difference in diagnostic interval is only 1.2 days. Multivariable models being up to date with mammography and multivariable linear regression model of time from first presentation to diagnosis. Multivariable models being up to date with mammography IRR (95% CI) Estimate (p-value) Immigrant statusYesNo 0.74(0.71-0.78)ref -0.30(<0.0001)ref Multivariable Linear regression model of time from first presentation to diagnosis Estimates (in days) (95% CI) P-value Immigrant statusYesNo 1.21(0.10, 2.32)ref 0.30ref

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e12572
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mammographic screening and time to breast cancer diagnosis among immigrants and long-term residents in Ontario.

Eileen Rakovitch, Omolara Fatiregun, Rinku Sutradhar, Lawrence Paszat et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Mammographic screening and time to breast cancer diagnosis among immigrants and long-term residents in Ontario.

Eileen Rakovitch, Omolara Fatiregun, Rinku Sutradhar, Lawrence Paszat, Andrea Eisen, Sho Podolsky
article en

Abstract

e12572 Background: Breast Cancer is the most common in women globally and among Canadian women. We explored differences in screening rates and the time to breast cancer (BC) diagnosis among immigrants and long-term residents in Ontario). Methods: We calculated the annual proportion of Ontario women aged 50 – 75 up-to-date with mammography from January 2012 to 2020 and assessed trends using negative binomial regression, adjusting for immigration status, age, marginalization quintiles, and resource utilization. For BC diagnosis, we identified women aged 18-75 from the Ontario Cancer Registry (2012-2019). We matched long-term residents to immigrants by age, stage, and year at diagnosis and modelled time to diagnosis with linear regression. Results: The percentage of women up-to-date with mammographic screening ranged from 50% in 2012 to 52% in 2020 for immigrants and 61.5% in 2012 to 60.1% in 2020 for long-term residents. The Cochran-Armitage trend test over the study period was p = 0.79. The median time to diagnosis was 28 days (IQR 16-59) for long-term residents and 31 days (IQR 17-64) for immigrants. The range for both groups of women was 1-359 days, and over 10% of women in both had a diagnostic interval above 135 days (90 th percentile). We examined the stage distribution for the study population before matching and found that slightly more immigrants were diagnosed in stages two and three compared to long-term residents (Stage 2 (34.3% vs 37.4%), Stage 3(12.3% vs 14.3%) p = < .0001) and overall, more immigrants were diagnosed with stages 2,3 than long term residents (51.7% vs 46.6% p = < .001) but Stage 4 disease was similar for both groups (4.7% vs 5% p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Immigrants have significantly (26%) lower rates of up-to-date mammography and longer (1.2 days) diagnostic intervals. We found a slightly higher prevalence of stages two and three at diagnosis. The variation within both strata is enormous, but the difference in diagnostic interval is only 1.2 days. Multivariable models being up to date with mammography and multivariable linear regression model of time from first presentation to diagnosis. Multivariable models being up to date with mammography IRR (95% CI) Estimate (p-value) Immigrant statusYesNo 0.74(0.71-0.78)ref -0.30(<0.0001)ref Multivariable Linear regression model of time from first presentation to diagnosis Estimates (in days) (95% CI) P-value Immigrant statusYesNo 1.21(0.10, 2.32)ref 0.30ref

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Public Health Ontario (CA), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.