Prevalence of androgen receptor ligand-binding domain mutations (AR-LBDm) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) versus tissue biopsies in participants (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and other tumor types.

3049 Background: AR-LBDm is a common mechanism of resistance to AR-directed therapies in patients with mCRPC. However, data on the utility of ctDNA-based versus tissue-based AR-LBDm detection in mCRPC and the prevalence of AR-LBDm in nonprostate cancers are lacking. We evaluated AR-LBDm in ctDNA and tumor tissue samples from pts with advanced solid tumors enrolled in various Merck & Co., Inc. trials. Methods: Samples came from pts with mCRPC and 25 other tumor types (eg, bladder, colorectal, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers). AR-LBDm data were available from ctDNA via 2 fixed panel-based ctDNA NGS assays or from tumor tissue samples (mainly archival) via a fixed-panel NGS assay. Data obtained from the 3 assays were nonoverlapping. AR-LBDm prevalence was evaluated in each tumor type and by BRCAm or HRRm status in pts with mCRPC. Results: The analysis included 3026 samples assessed by ctDNA assay 1 (mCRPC, n = 1785; other, n = 1241), 2232 samples assessed by ctDNA assay 2 (mCRPC, n = 378; other, n = 1854), and 8181 samples from tissue biopsies (mCRPC, n = 833; other, n = 7348). AR-LBDm was detected in 21.0% of pts with mCRPC by ctDNA assay 1 and 19.8% of pts with mCRPC by ctDNA assay 2. Across all other tumor types, only 1 pt (with hepatocellular carcinoma) had an AR-LBDm in ctDNA. The prevalence of selected AR-LBDm in tissue biopsies was 5.4% (45/833) in pts with mCRPC, 0.6% (1/159) in pts with salivary cancer, and 0% in all other tumor types. AR-LBDm prevalence in pts with mCRPC increased with later-line treatments (Tx) both by tissue and ctDNA analyses and was similar regardless of BRCAm or HRRm status (table). The prevalence of the AR-LBD T878A mutation (by ctDNA) in pts with mCRPC was higher after prior Tx with abiraterone than with enzalutamide (20.9% [43/206] vs 1.7% [3/173]). AR-LBDm was observed in tissues biopsied from the mCRPC setting (prevalence, 12.8% [12/94]) and was associated with higher AR transcriptional activity than in AR-LBD–negative tissues. Conclusions: Similar prevalence of AR-LBDm was observed in ctDNA of pts with mCRPC by 2 different ctDNA assays; AR-LBDm prevalence in archival tissue samples was lower than by ctDNA analysis, likely due to the Tx-emergent nature of AR-LBDm. AR-LBDm prevalence was similar regardless of BRCAm or HRRm status in mCRPC, although prevalence of certain AR-LBDm is impacted by the specific prior AR-directed Tx. These data support ctDNA-based (rather than tissue-based) AR-LBDm testing in pts with mCRPC. AR-LBDm prevalence, % (n/N) Frontline Tx Later-line Tx ctDNA assay 1 16.6 (122/734) 23.8 (252/1059) ctDNA assay 2 Not available 19.8 (75/378) Tissue biopsy 0.6 (3/535) 4.1 (147/3625) AR-LBDm +ve* AR-LBDm -ve * BRCA Mut WT 26.5 (9/34)27.5 (95/345) 73.5 (25/34)72.5 (250/345) HRR Mut WT 28.8 (30/104)26.9 (74/275) 71.2 (74/104)73.1 (201/275) *Per ctDNA assay 1.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.3049
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of androgen receptor ligand-binding domain mutations (AR-LBDm) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) versus tissue biopsies in participants (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and other tumor types.

Carol E. Peña, Karim Fizazi, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Elisha J. Dettman et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Prevalence of androgen receptor ligand-binding domain mutations (AR-LBDm) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) versus tissue biopsies in participants (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and other tumor types.

Carol E. Peña, Karim Fizazi, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Elisha J. Dettman, Răzvan Cristescu, Chen Cai, Alice Bernard‐Tessier, Evan Y. Yu, Amir Vajdi, Nicole Barkley, April Wang
article en

Abstract

3049 Background: AR-LBDm is a common mechanism of resistance to AR-directed therapies in patients with mCRPC. However, data on the utility of ctDNA-based versus tissue-based AR-LBDm detection in mCRPC and the prevalence of AR-LBDm in nonprostate cancers are lacking. We evaluated AR-LBDm in ctDNA and tumor tissue samples from pts with advanced solid tumors enrolled in various Merck & Co., Inc. trials. Methods: Samples came from pts with mCRPC and 25 other tumor types (eg, bladder, colorectal, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers). AR-LBDm data were available from ctDNA via 2 fixed panel-based ctDNA NGS assays or from tumor tissue samples (mainly archival) via a fixed-panel NGS assay. Data obtained from the 3 assays were nonoverlapping. AR-LBDm prevalence was evaluated in each tumor type and by BRCAm or HRRm status in pts with mCRPC. Results: The analysis included 3026 samples assessed by ctDNA assay 1 (mCRPC, n = 1785; other, n = 1241), 2232 samples assessed by ctDNA assay 2 (mCRPC, n = 378; other, n = 1854), and 8181 samples from tissue biopsies (mCRPC, n = 833; other, n = 7348). AR-LBDm was detected in 21.0% of pts with mCRPC by ctDNA assay 1 and 19.8% of pts with mCRPC by ctDNA assay 2. Across all other tumor types, only 1 pt (with hepatocellular carcinoma) had an AR-LBDm in ctDNA. The prevalence of selected AR-LBDm in tissue biopsies was 5.4% (45/833) in pts with mCRPC, 0.6% (1/159) in pts with salivary cancer, and 0% in all other tumor types. AR-LBDm prevalence in pts with mCRPC increased with later-line treatments (Tx) both by tissue and ctDNA analyses and was similar regardless of BRCAm or HRRm status (table). The prevalence of the AR-LBD T878A mutation (by ctDNA) in pts with mCRPC was higher after prior Tx with abiraterone than with enzalutamide (20.9% [43/206] vs 1.7% [3/173]). AR-LBDm was observed in tissues biopsied from the mCRPC setting (prevalence, 12.8% [12/94]) and was associated with higher AR transcriptional activity than in AR-LBD–negative tissues. Conclusions: Similar prevalence of AR-LBDm was observed in ctDNA of pts with mCRPC by 2 different ctDNA assays; AR-LBDm prevalence in archival tissue samples was lower than by ctDNA analysis, likely due to the Tx-emergent nature of AR-LBDm. AR-LBDm prevalence was similar regardless of BRCAm or HRRm status in mCRPC, although prevalence of certain AR-LBDm is impacted by the specific prior AR-directed Tx. These data support ctDNA-based (rather than tissue-based) AR-LBDm testing in pts with mCRPC. AR-LBDm prevalence, % (n/N) Frontline Tx Later-line Tx ctDNA assay 1 16.6 (122/734) 23.8 (252/1059) ctDNA assay 2 Not available 19.8 (75/378) Tissue biopsy 0.6 (3/535) 4.1 (147/3625) AR-LBDm +ve* AR-LBDm -ve * BRCA Mut WT 26.5 (9/34)27.5 (95/345) 73.5 (25/34)72.5 (250/345) HRR Mut WT 28.8 (30/104)26.9 (74/275) 71.2 (74/104)73.1 (201/275) *Per ctDNA assay 1.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), University of Minnesota (US), University of Washington (US), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.