Tislelizumab as monotherapy or in sequential combination with lenvatinib for neoadjuvant treatment of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective, phase II clinical study.

e16292 Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy represents a potential approach to improve the post-surgical prognosis of resectable HCC. Nevertheless, given that early-stage HCC is distinct from advanced disease, it remains uncertain whether immune-based monotherapy or combination therapy is sufficient in the neoadjuvant setting. This study aims to explore the preliminary efficacy and safety of Tislelizumab monotherapy or its sequential combination with Lenvatinib in the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable HCC. Methods: In this phase Ⅱ study (NCT05807776), enrolled HCC patients received 2 cycles of Tislelizumab (200mg, Q3W) firstly. Patients who achieved partial response (PR) or reduced stable disease (SD) directly received surgery, followed by adjuvant treatment with Tislelizumab. Patients who achieved progressive disease (PD) or increased SD continued to receive 2 cycles of Tislelizumab and Lenvatinib(8mg/d), followed by surgery and adjuvant treatment with Tislelizumab and Lenvatinib. The primary endpoint was major pathologic response rate (MPR, tumor necrosis > 70%), secondary endpoints were 1 and 2-year DFS rate, ORR, surgical delay rate and safety. Results: Up to 12 th Jun 2024, 36 patients were enrolled with a median age of 59 years. All patients were Child-Pugh class A and ECOG PS 0. 35 (97.2%) patients were BCLC stage A and 32 (88.9%) patients had HBV infection. 5 (13.9%) patients received Tislelizumab plus Lenvatinib sequentially after the first tumor evaluation according to the protocol. In the neoadjuvant setting, ORR was 16.7% per RECIST v1.1 and 30.6% per mRECIST. DCR was 91.7%. 33 (91.7%) patients underwent surgery eventually and MPR was 24.2%, including 5 (15.2%) pCR. At the data cut off (12 th Jan 2025), the median follow-up time was 14 months (95% CI: 12.82-15.18). median DFS was not reached. 1 and 2-year DFS were 73.8% and 58.5%, respectively. Treatment related AEs (TRAE) occurred in 38.9% patients. Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 11.1% patients, including dermatomyositis (n = 1), oral mucositis (n = 1) and rash (n = 1). There was no grade 4/5 AE. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant Tislelizumab monotherapy or sequentially combined with Lenvatinib was well tolerable and showed promising efficacy in early-stage resectable HCC. Our study showed that a proportion of early-stage HCC patients could derive benefits from neoadjuvant Tislelizumab monotherapy, while the combination regimen might be a more favorable choice for some others. Further analysis on the prognostic factors of treatment response is necessary to optimize neoadjuvant therapy regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT05807776 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16292
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tislelizumab as monotherapy or in sequential combination with lenvatinib for neoadjuvant treatment of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective, phase II clinical study.

Ruyu Han, Ping Chen, Lu Chen, Tianqiang Song
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Tislelizumab as monotherapy or in sequential combination with lenvatinib for neoadjuvant treatment of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective, phase II clinical study.

Ruyu Han, Ping Chen, Lu Chen, Tianqiang Song
article en

Abstract

e16292 Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy represents a potential approach to improve the post-surgical prognosis of resectable HCC. Nevertheless, given that early-stage HCC is distinct from advanced disease, it remains uncertain whether immune-based monotherapy or combination therapy is sufficient in the neoadjuvant setting. This study aims to explore the preliminary efficacy and safety of Tislelizumab monotherapy or its sequential combination with Lenvatinib in the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable HCC. Methods: In this phase Ⅱ study (NCT05807776), enrolled HCC patients received 2 cycles of Tislelizumab (200mg, Q3W) firstly. Patients who achieved partial response (PR) or reduced stable disease (SD) directly received surgery, followed by adjuvant treatment with Tislelizumab. Patients who achieved progressive disease (PD) or increased SD continued to receive 2 cycles of Tislelizumab and Lenvatinib(8mg/d), followed by surgery and adjuvant treatment with Tislelizumab and Lenvatinib. The primary endpoint was major pathologic response rate (MPR, tumor necrosis > 70%), secondary endpoints were 1 and 2-year DFS rate, ORR, surgical delay rate and safety. Results: Up to 12 th Jun 2024, 36 patients were enrolled with a median age of 59 years. All patients were Child-Pugh class A and ECOG PS 0. 35 (97.2%) patients were BCLC stage A and 32 (88.9%) patients had HBV infection. 5 (13.9%) patients received Tislelizumab plus Lenvatinib sequentially after the first tumor evaluation according to the protocol. In the neoadjuvant setting, ORR was 16.7% per RECIST v1.1 and 30.6% per mRECIST. DCR was 91.7%. 33 (91.7%) patients underwent surgery eventually and MPR was 24.2%, including 5 (15.2%) pCR. At the data cut off (12 th Jan 2025), the median follow-up time was 14 months (95% CI: 12.82-15.18). median DFS was not reached. 1 and 2-year DFS were 73.8% and 58.5%, respectively. Treatment related AEs (TRAE) occurred in 38.9% patients. Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 11.1% patients, including dermatomyositis (n = 1), oral mucositis (n = 1) and rash (n = 1). There was no grade 4/5 AE. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant Tislelizumab monotherapy or sequentially combined with Lenvatinib was well tolerable and showed promising efficacy in early-stage resectable HCC. Our study showed that a proportion of early-stage HCC patients could derive benefits from neoadjuvant Tislelizumab monotherapy, while the combination regimen might be a more favorable choice for some others. Further analysis on the prognostic factors of treatment response is necessary to optimize neoadjuvant therapy regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT05807776 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.