Enhancing lung cancer surgical quality: Insights from a national quality improvement collaborative.

11140 Background: Sampling of at least 3 mediastinal and at least 1 hilar lymph node stations during lung cancer resection was adopted by the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Commission on Cancer (CoC) as Operative Standard 5.8 to ensure appropriate staging, guide adjuvant systemic therapy, and improve overall survival. Early assessments suggested difficulty with reaching goal hospital-level compliance rates of ≥80%. The objectives of this study were to compare compliance with Standard 5.8 before and after participation in the Lung NODES national quality improvement (QI) collaborative and to identify facilitators to achieving compliance. Methods: Lung NODES enrolled 354 CoC-accredited hospitals in January 2024. Over 12 months, all hospitals actively participated in guided root cause analyses, educational webinars, peer-to-peer learning, and the development and implementation of hospital-level strategies. Baseline and post-participation surveys collected data on Standard 5.8 compliance and differences in hospital-level compliance were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The post-participation survey queried hospitals on facilitators to achieving compliance. Results: The number of hospitals achieving ≥80% compliance with Standard 5.8 increased from 144 (40.7%) to 238 (67.2%) from baseline to post-participation, respectively. Hospital-level median compliance increased from 67.8% (IQR 42.9-90) to 90.5% (IQR 70-100), p<0.001. All hospital types had an increase in mean absolute difference in compliance, with the largest increase seen for community hospitals (25.4%, STD 43.5) (Table). For the 114 programs that newly achieved compliance, facilitators included surgeon buy-in (83.3%), proactive specimen labeling (76.3%), and multidisciplinary communication (73.7%). Conclusions: Participation in Lung NODES was associated with higher compliance with Standard 5.8 irrespective of hospital type, suggesting that national QI collaboratives may represent an effective large-scale approach to address gaps in cancer care delivery. Operative standard 5.8 compliance by hospital type at baseline and after participation in Lung NODES. Hospital Type Baseline Compliant Programsn (%) Final Compliant Programsn (%) Baseline Compliance Median (IQR) Final Compliance Median (IQR) Absolute Difference in ComplianceMean (STD) Academic N= 50 19 (38.0) 38 (76.0) 68.7 (35.0-90.0) 88.9 (80.0-100) 20.0 (29.8) Community N=32 10 (31.3) 21 (65.6) 56.3 (23.6-83.8) 93.4 (66.7-100) 25.4 (43.5) Comprehensive Community N=147 55 (37.4) 97 (66.0) 65.0 (42.9-89.5) 91.7 (66.7-100) 17.5 (30.3) Integrated Network N=102 51 (50.0) 68 (66.7) 78.6 (50.0-92.2) 90.2 (70.6-100) 12.8 (29.0) Other N=23 9 (39.1) 14 (60.9) 69.0 (40.0-81.7) 84.6 (60.0-100) 13.2 (35.1)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.11140
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing lung cancer surgical quality: Insights from a national quality improvement collaborative.

Matthew H. G. Katz, Amanda B. Francescatti, Eileen M. Reilly, Raheem Bell et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Enhancing lung cancer surgical quality: Insights from a national quality improvement collaborative.

Matthew H. G. Katz, Amanda B. Francescatti, Eileen M. Reilly, Raheem Bell, Linda W. Martin, John Hamm, Kimberly Rodriguez, David D. Odell, Ronald J. Weigel, Matthew A. Facktor, Kirtee Raparia, Kelley Chan, Thomas D. Coates, Ryan C Jacobs, Anthony D. Yang
article en

Abstract

11140 Background: Sampling of at least 3 mediastinal and at least 1 hilar lymph node stations during lung cancer resection was adopted by the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Commission on Cancer (CoC) as Operative Standard 5.8 to ensure appropriate staging, guide adjuvant systemic therapy, and improve overall survival. Early assessments suggested difficulty with reaching goal hospital-level compliance rates of ≥80%. The objectives of this study were to compare compliance with Standard 5.8 before and after participation in the Lung NODES national quality improvement (QI) collaborative and to identify facilitators to achieving compliance. Methods: Lung NODES enrolled 354 CoC-accredited hospitals in January 2024. Over 12 months, all hospitals actively participated in guided root cause analyses, educational webinars, peer-to-peer learning, and the development and implementation of hospital-level strategies. Baseline and post-participation surveys collected data on Standard 5.8 compliance and differences in hospital-level compliance were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The post-participation survey queried hospitals on facilitators to achieving compliance. Results: The number of hospitals achieving ≥80% compliance with Standard 5.8 increased from 144 (40.7%) to 238 (67.2%) from baseline to post-participation, respectively. Hospital-level median compliance increased from 67.8% (IQR 42.9-90) to 90.5% (IQR 70-100), p<0.001. All hospital types had an increase in mean absolute difference in compliance, with the largest increase seen for community hospitals (25.4%, STD 43.5) (Table). For the 114 programs that newly achieved compliance, facilitators included surgeon buy-in (83.3%), proactive specimen labeling (76.3%), and multidisciplinary communication (73.7%). Conclusions: Participation in Lung NODES was associated with higher compliance with Standard 5.8 irrespective of hospital type, suggesting that national QI collaboratives may represent an effective large-scale approach to address gaps in cancer care delivery. Operative standard 5.8 compliance by hospital type at baseline and after participation in Lung NODES. Hospital Type Baseline Compliant Programsn (%) Final Compliant Programsn (%) Baseline Compliance Median (IQR) Final Compliance Median (IQR) Absolute Difference in ComplianceMean (STD) Academic N= 50 19 (38.0) 38 (76.0) 68.7 (35.0-90.0) 88.9 (80.0-100) 20.0 (29.8) Community N=32 10 (31.3) 21 (65.6) 56.3 (23.6-83.8) 93.4 (66.7-100) 25.4 (43.5) Comprehensive Community N=147 55 (37.4) 97 (66.0) 65.0 (42.9-89.5) 91.7 (66.7-100) 17.5 (30.3) Integrated Network N=102 51 (50.0) 68 (66.7) 78.6 (50.0-92.2) 90.2 (70.6-100) 12.8 (29.0) Other N=23 9 (39.1) 14 (60.9) 69.0 (40.0-81.7) 84.6 (60.0-100) 13.2 (35.1)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Northwestern University (US), Geisinger Medical Center (US), Eisenhower Medical Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Norton Healthcare (US), University of Michigan (US), Kaiser Permanente Santa Clara Medical Center (US), University of Virginia (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), American College of Surgeons (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.