Capturing Information About Multiple Sclerosis Comorbidity Using Clinical Interviews and Administrative Records: Do the Data Sources Agree?

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Multiple sclerosis (MS) is often associated with comorbidities that affect clinical outcomes. Data on comorbidities can be sourced from self-reports, medical records, and administrative databases. The gold standard for collecting such data is prospective clinical collection, as in clinical trials, but this is not feasible in large epidemiological studies. This study aimed to assess the agreement between two data sources, clinical interviews and administrative records, identifying major comorbidities in people with MS (pwMS). <b>Methods</b>: We evaluated the agreement between clinical interview data and administrative records in pwMS enrolled at two sites (2021-2022). Seven comorbidities were investigated: depression, anxiety, diabetes, hypertension, autoimmune disease, chronic lung disease, and hyperlipidemia. We used kappa (κ), sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values to assess agreement. <b>Results</b>: The frequency of comorbidities varied between the sources. Administrative data often underestimated hypertension, autoimmune diseases, hyperlipidemia, and anxiety, but over-reported depression. It had high sensitivity for diabetes (80%) and moderate sensitivity for hypertension (62%). The agreement for diabetes (κ = 98.9%, PABAK = 0.98, positive agreement = 83.3%) and hypertension (κ = 89.8%, PABAK = 0.80, positive agreement = 70.8%) was high. <b>Conclusions</b>: The agreement between administrative data and clinical interviews was excellent for diabetes and hypertension. For other conditions, such as psychiatric, hyperlipidemia, and autoimmune comorbidities, administrative data had lower sensitivity, and often under-reported or misclassified the data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13111281
Primary Topic
Medical Coding and Health Information
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capturing Information About Multiple Sclerosis Comorbidity Using Clinical Interviews and Administrative Records: Do the Data Sources Agree?

Andrea Tacchino, Roberto Bergamaschi, Giampaolo Brichetto, Pietro Perotti et al.
Healthcare
Medical Coding and Health Information
article

Capturing Information About Multiple Sclerosis Comorbidity Using Clinical Interviews and Administrative Records: Do the Data Sources Agree?

Andrea Tacchino, Roberto Bergamaschi, Giampaolo Brichetto, Pietro Perotti, Daniela Amicizia, Filippo Ansaldi, Giulia Mallucci, Paola Borrelli, Maria Cristina Monti, Michela Ponzio, Cristina Montomoli, Simona Dalle Carbonare, Marco Salivetto
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Multiple sclerosis (MS) is often associated with comorbidities that affect clinical outcomes. Data on comorbidities can be sourced from self-reports, medical records, and administrative databases. The gold standard for collecting such data is prospective clinical collection, as in clinical trials, but this is not feasible in large epidemiological studies. This study aimed to assess the agreement between two data sources, clinical interviews and administrative records, identifying major comorbidities in people with MS (pwMS). <b>Methods</b>: We evaluated the agreement between clinical interview data and administrative records in pwMS enrolled at two sites (2021-2022). Seven comorbidities were investigated: depression, anxiety, diabetes, hypertension, autoimmune disease, chronic lung disease, and hyperlipidemia. We used kappa (κ), sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values to assess agreement. <b>Results</b>: The frequency of comorbidities varied between the sources. Administrative data often underestimated hypertension, autoimmune diseases, hyperlipidemia, and anxiety, but over-reported depression. It had high sensitivity for diabetes (80%) and moderate sensitivity for hypertension (62%). The agreement for diabetes (κ = 98.9%, PABAK = 0.98, positive agreement = 83.3%) and hypertension (κ = 89.8%, PABAK = 0.80, positive agreement = 70.8%) was high. <b>Conclusions</b>: The agreement between administrative data and clinical interviews was excellent for diabetes and hypertension. For other conditions, such as psychiatric, hyperlipidemia, and autoimmune comorbidities, administrative data had lower sensitivity, and often under-reported or misclassified the data.

HealthcareVol. 13(11)
University of Pavia (IT), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (IT), Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell'ambiente ligure (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Medical Coding and Health Information
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.