Differences in insurance status among Asian Americans with cancer: A disaggregated analysis by ethnic subgroup.

1529 Background: Asian Americans, the fastest-growing racial/ethnic group in the U.S., experience significant variation in barriers to cancer care access, yet most research treats them as a monolithic group. Insurance is crucial for accessing cancer care, but limited data exist on non-insurance rates among Asian Americans. This study investigates the heterogeneity in insurance status across Asian American subgroups in the context of common cancers. Methods: We analyzed data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), and focused on breast, prostate, and non-small-cell lung cancers among patients under 65. Insurance status was dichotomized as non-insured/Medicaid versus private/government/Medicare/other, and binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for insurance status by Asian American subgroups. Results: There were 2,161,947 patients with breast cancer, 603,172 with lung cancer, and 964,423 with prostate cancer. We found significant heterogeneity in insurance status among Asian American subgroups; such heterogeneity was mirrored across the three most common cancer types. Consistently, Japanese Americans were less likely to be uninsured or have Medicaid than White Americans (4.5%, 2.5%, and 12.2%, for patients with breast, prostate, and lung cancer, respectively, among Japanese-Americans vs. 10.2%, 5.5%, and 20.7% among White Americans, (odds ratio 0.54(95% CI: 0.47-0.61) for breast, 0.55(0.37-0.83) for prostate, 0.72(0.56-0.91) for lung), while every other Asian subgroup was significantly more likely to be uninsured or have Medicaid than White Americans (OR range 1.24 to 7.23 for breast, 1.25 to 10.42 for prostate, 1.12 to 6.39 for lung, all p-values <0.05 except for Laotians, Hmongs, and Thai with prostate cancer). Pakistani Americans were the group most likely to be uninsured or on Medicaid among patients with breast cancer (OR 7.22 (6.17-8.46) and prostate cancer (OR 10.41 (7.08-15.33) and were the second-most likely subgroup among patients with lung cancer (OR 4.82 (3.21-7.23). Hmong and Kampuchean were among the top three groups with breast or lung cancer who were uninsured or on Medicaid. Conclusions: Significant heterogeneity exists in insurance coverage among Asian American subgroups, which highlights the diversity of disparities Asian American patients face; these findings call into question the model minority myth, as every other Asian American subgroup besides Japanese-American was significantly less likely to be insured than White Americans. Asian American patients have broad differences in histories, social determinants of health, and barriers to accessing care, which may merit differentially targeted health interventions among certain subgroups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.1529
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in insurance status among Asian Americans with cancer: A disaggregated analysis by ethnic subgroup.

Emily Feng, Eric Feng, Isabella Nguyen, Edward Christopher Dee et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Differences in insurance status among Asian Americans with cancer: A disaggregated analysis by ethnic subgroup.

Emily Feng, Eric Feng, Isabella Nguyen, Edward Christopher Dee, Erin Jay G. Feliciano, Lilac Nguyen
article en

Abstract

1529 Background: Asian Americans, the fastest-growing racial/ethnic group in the U.S., experience significant variation in barriers to cancer care access, yet most research treats them as a monolithic group. Insurance is crucial for accessing cancer care, but limited data exist on non-insurance rates among Asian Americans. This study investigates the heterogeneity in insurance status across Asian American subgroups in the context of common cancers. Methods: We analyzed data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), and focused on breast, prostate, and non-small-cell lung cancers among patients under 65. Insurance status was dichotomized as non-insured/Medicaid versus private/government/Medicare/other, and binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for insurance status by Asian American subgroups. Results: There were 2,161,947 patients with breast cancer, 603,172 with lung cancer, and 964,423 with prostate cancer. We found significant heterogeneity in insurance status among Asian American subgroups; such heterogeneity was mirrored across the three most common cancer types. Consistently, Japanese Americans were less likely to be uninsured or have Medicaid than White Americans (4.5%, 2.5%, and 12.2%, for patients with breast, prostate, and lung cancer, respectively, among Japanese-Americans vs. 10.2%, 5.5%, and 20.7% among White Americans, (odds ratio 0.54(95% CI: 0.47-0.61) for breast, 0.55(0.37-0.83) for prostate, 0.72(0.56-0.91) for lung), while every other Asian subgroup was significantly more likely to be uninsured or have Medicaid than White Americans (OR range 1.24 to 7.23 for breast, 1.25 to 10.42 for prostate, 1.12 to 6.39 for lung, all p-values <0.05 except for Laotians, Hmongs, and Thai with prostate cancer). Pakistani Americans were the group most likely to be uninsured or on Medicaid among patients with breast cancer (OR 7.22 (6.17-8.46) and prostate cancer (OR 10.41 (7.08-15.33) and were the second-most likely subgroup among patients with lung cancer (OR 4.82 (3.21-7.23). Hmong and Kampuchean were among the top three groups with breast or lung cancer who were uninsured or on Medicaid. Conclusions: Significant heterogeneity exists in insurance coverage among Asian American subgroups, which highlights the diversity of disparities Asian American patients face; these findings call into question the model minority myth, as every other Asian American subgroup besides Japanese-American was significantly less likely to be insured than White Americans. Asian American patients have broad differences in histories, social determinants of health, and barriers to accessing care, which may merit differentially targeted health interventions among certain subgroups.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Elmhurst Hospital Center (US), UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.