Association of socioeconomic deprivation with clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients with cancer.

e23107 Background: Individuals with cancer often require hospitalization to address acute concerns. Structural barriers, such as socioeconomic deprivation, may impact patients’ healthcare utilization. However, little is known about associations of socioeconomic deprivation with clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients with cancer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with cancer who were admitted to the University of Oklahoma Medical Center from 1/2017-12/2022. We extracted information from the electronic health record about patients’ socioeconomic deprivation (measured as area deprivation index [ADI]), as well as demographic and clinical characteristics. We categorized ADI into quartile groups (Q1-Q4, with Q4 indicating areas of highest deprivation). We used regression models to explore associations of ADI with patients’ demographic/clinical characteristics and their clinical outcomes (hospital length of stay [hazard ratio {HR} for time to discharge], time to readmission, and overall survival). Results: Among 20,683 patients (mean age 62.2, 51.5% female sex, 41.0% metastatic disease), the most common cancer types were gastrointestinal (GI; 19.3%), genitourinary (13.8%), and gynecologic (13.7%). Races represented were White (80.1%), Black (9.8%), American Indian/Alaska Native (4.8%), Asian (2.6%), and other (2.7%). Mean ADI score was 56.9 ± 26.0, with 17.7% of patients in Q1, 17.6% in Q2, 36.5% in Q3, and 28.2% in Q4. Factors significantly associated with ADI included older age (Beta [B]=-.10, p<.001), race (American Indian/Alaska Native patients [B=11.5, p<.001] and Black patients [B=13.0, p<.001]), comorbid conditions (CCI 1-2 [B:1.47, p=.003]; CCI 3+ [B:2.41, p<.001]), and cancer type (GI: ref; CNS [B=-2.68, p<.001], melanoma [B=-3.85, p=.004], sarcoma [B=-4.19, p=.002]). In multivariable models adjusted for demographic variables significantly associated with ADI, higher ADI was associated with longer length of stay (Q1: ref, Q2: HR=.96, p=.067; Q3: HR .89, p<.001; Q4: HR=.88, p<.001), lower risk for readmission (Q1: ref, Q2: HR=.89, p=.002; Q3: HR=.87, p<.001; Q4: HR=.89, p<.001), and worse survival (Q1: ref, Q2: HR=1.08, p=.054; Q3: HR=1.17, p<.001; Q4: HR=1.20, p<.001). Conclusions: In this large cohort of hospitalized patients with cancer, we identified factors associated with socioeconomic deprivation, such as age, race, comorbid conditions, and cancer type. Importantly, we found patients residing in socioeconomically deprived areas experienced worse outcomes, including longer length of stay and worse overall survival (notably ADI was associated with lower risk of readmission, which is hypothesis-generating). Further understanding of structural barriers and how they correlate with outcomes of hospitalized patients with cancer is necessary to enhance care delivery and outcomes in socioeconomically vulnerable individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e23107
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of socioeconomic deprivation with clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients with cancer.

Ryan David Nipp, David Bard, Katie Keyser, William H. Beasley et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Association of socioeconomic deprivation with clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients with cancer.

Ryan David Nipp, David Bard, Katie Keyser, William H. Beasley, Sara K. Vesely, Anh B. Lam, Ashley Thumann, Vanessa Moore, GW Daniel, Gjinovefa Kola, Bingi A. Kanagwa
article en

Abstract

e23107 Background: Individuals with cancer often require hospitalization to address acute concerns. Structural barriers, such as socioeconomic deprivation, may impact patients’ healthcare utilization. However, little is known about associations of socioeconomic deprivation with clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients with cancer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with cancer who were admitted to the University of Oklahoma Medical Center from 1/2017-12/2022. We extracted information from the electronic health record about patients’ socioeconomic deprivation (measured as area deprivation index [ADI]), as well as demographic and clinical characteristics. We categorized ADI into quartile groups (Q1-Q4, with Q4 indicating areas of highest deprivation). We used regression models to explore associations of ADI with patients’ demographic/clinical characteristics and their clinical outcomes (hospital length of stay [hazard ratio {HR} for time to discharge], time to readmission, and overall survival). Results: Among 20,683 patients (mean age 62.2, 51.5% female sex, 41.0% metastatic disease), the most common cancer types were gastrointestinal (GI; 19.3%), genitourinary (13.8%), and gynecologic (13.7%). Races represented were White (80.1%), Black (9.8%), American Indian/Alaska Native (4.8%), Asian (2.6%), and other (2.7%). Mean ADI score was 56.9 ± 26.0, with 17.7% of patients in Q1, 17.6% in Q2, 36.5% in Q3, and 28.2% in Q4. Factors significantly associated with ADI included older age (Beta [B]=-.10, p<.001), race (American Indian/Alaska Native patients [B=11.5, p<.001] and Black patients [B=13.0, p<.001]), comorbid conditions (CCI 1-2 [B:1.47, p=.003]; CCI 3+ [B:2.41, p<.001]), and cancer type (GI: ref; CNS [B=-2.68, p<.001], melanoma [B=-3.85, p=.004], sarcoma [B=-4.19, p=.002]). In multivariable models adjusted for demographic variables significantly associated with ADI, higher ADI was associated with longer length of stay (Q1: ref, Q2: HR=.96, p=.067; Q3: HR .89, p<.001; Q4: HR=.88, p<.001), lower risk for readmission (Q1: ref, Q2: HR=.89, p=.002; Q3: HR=.87, p<.001; Q4: HR=.89, p<.001), and worse survival (Q1: ref, Q2: HR=1.08, p=.054; Q3: HR=1.17, p<.001; Q4: HR=1.20, p<.001). Conclusions: In this large cohort of hospitalized patients with cancer, we identified factors associated with socioeconomic deprivation, such as age, race, comorbid conditions, and cancer type. Importantly, we found patients residing in socioeconomically deprived areas experienced worse outcomes, including longer length of stay and worse overall survival (notably ADI was associated with lower risk of readmission, which is hypothesis-generating). Further understanding of structural barriers and how they correlate with outcomes of hospitalized patients with cancer is necessary to enhance care delivery and outcomes in socioeconomically vulnerable individuals.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Bellevue College (US), Oklahoma City University (US), University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.