A geographic information system (GIS)-based analysis of county-level economic and social vulnerabilities in FDA-certified mammogram facilities and breast cancer outcomes in Florida.

e13736 Background: Breast cancer (BC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, with outcomes influenced by socioeconomic factors such as the Economic Hardship Index (EHI) and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). Socioeconomic factors also impact access to mammogram facilities. This study examines the relationship and spatial distribution of FDA-certified mammogram facilities, cancer rates, EHI, and SVI in Florida to identify disparities impacting BC outcomes. Methods: BC age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIR, 2017-2021) and mortality rates (AAMR, 2018-2022) were sourced from the National Cancer Institute, EHI scores (2018-2022) from the Florida Department of Health, 2020 SVI rankings from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and mammogram facility data from FDA-certified registries. Choropleth maps were created to visualize facility distributions with AAIR, AAMR, EHI, and SVI metrics. Regression and correlation analyses assessed relationships among these variables. Results: Higher SVI rankings were associated with increased AAMR (β = 3.80, p = 0.03) and decreased AAIR (β = -41.49, p < 0.001). Higher EHI was significantly linked to lower AAIR (β = -0.37, p < 0.001). The total number of mammogram facilities negatively correlated with AAMR (β = -0.06, p = 0.02). Strong positive correlations between EHI and SVI (r = 0.70, p < 0.0001) indicate that economically disadvantaged counties often face higher social vulnerability. EHI (r = -0.41, p < 0.001) and SVI (r = -0.41, p < 0.001) were negatively correlated with AAIR, suggesting that socioeconomic barriers may impede early cancer detection. SVI was positively correlated with AAMR (r = 0.30, p = 0.03), while the total number of facilities negatively correlated with AAMR (r = -0.32, p = 0.02). These trends, supported by spatial maps, highlight inequities in mammogram facility access in underserved areas facing socioeconomic challenges. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the urgent need to address socioeconomic and social vulnerabilities to reduce cancer disparities. Policy reforms are essential to improve access to mammogram facilities and early detection services, particularly in underserved areas, to mitigate systemic barriers disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations. Pearson correlation coefficients among socioeconomic, facility, and health outcome variables. EHI SVI Total Number of Facilities in a County Facility Density (facilities per 100,000 residents) Age-Adjusted Mortality Rate/100,000 Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate /100,000 EHI 1.00 SVI 0.69 1.00 Total Number of Facilities in a County -0.24 0.03 1.00 Facility Density (facilities per 100,000 residents) -0.08 -0.05 0.05 1.00 Age-Adjusted Mortality Rate/100,000 0.24 0.30 -0.32 0.11 1.00 Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate /100,000 -0.41 -0.41 0.20 -0.23 -0.40 1.00

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e13736
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A geographic information system (GIS)-based analysis of county-level economic and social vulnerabilities in FDA-certified mammogram facilities and breast cancer outcomes in Florida.

Ganqian Zhu, LaShae D. Rolle, Sophia H.L. George, Maurice J. Chery et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Public Health Policies and Education
article

A geographic information system (GIS)-based analysis of county-level economic and social vulnerabilities in FDA-certified mammogram facilities and breast cancer outcomes in Florida.

Ganqian Zhu, LaShae D. Rolle, Sophia H.L. George, Maurice J. Chery, Tracy E. Crane
article en

Abstract

e13736 Background: Breast cancer (BC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, with outcomes influenced by socioeconomic factors such as the Economic Hardship Index (EHI) and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). Socioeconomic factors also impact access to mammogram facilities. This study examines the relationship and spatial distribution of FDA-certified mammogram facilities, cancer rates, EHI, and SVI in Florida to identify disparities impacting BC outcomes. Methods: BC age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIR, 2017-2021) and mortality rates (AAMR, 2018-2022) were sourced from the National Cancer Institute, EHI scores (2018-2022) from the Florida Department of Health, 2020 SVI rankings from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and mammogram facility data from FDA-certified registries. Choropleth maps were created to visualize facility distributions with AAIR, AAMR, EHI, and SVI metrics. Regression and correlation analyses assessed relationships among these variables. Results: Higher SVI rankings were associated with increased AAMR (β = 3.80, p = 0.03) and decreased AAIR (β = -41.49, p < 0.001). Higher EHI was significantly linked to lower AAIR (β = -0.37, p < 0.001). The total number of mammogram facilities negatively correlated with AAMR (β = -0.06, p = 0.02). Strong positive correlations between EHI and SVI (r = 0.70, p < 0.0001) indicate that economically disadvantaged counties often face higher social vulnerability. EHI (r = -0.41, p < 0.001) and SVI (r = -0.41, p < 0.001) were negatively correlated with AAIR, suggesting that socioeconomic barriers may impede early cancer detection. SVI was positively correlated with AAMR (r = 0.30, p = 0.03), while the total number of facilities negatively correlated with AAMR (r = -0.32, p = 0.02). These trends, supported by spatial maps, highlight inequities in mammogram facility access in underserved areas facing socioeconomic challenges. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the urgent need to address socioeconomic and social vulnerabilities to reduce cancer disparities. Policy reforms are essential to improve access to mammogram facilities and early detection services, particularly in underserved areas, to mitigate systemic barriers disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations. Pearson correlation coefficients among socioeconomic, facility, and health outcome variables. EHI SVI Total Number of Facilities in a County Facility Density (facilities per 100,000 residents) Age-Adjusted Mortality Rate/100,000 Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate /100,000 EHI 1.00 SVI 0.69 1.00 Total Number of Facilities in a County -0.24 0.03 1.00 Facility Density (facilities per 100,000 residents) -0.08 -0.05 0.05 1.00 Age-Adjusted Mortality Rate/100,000 0.24 0.30 -0.32 0.11 1.00 Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate /100,000 -0.41 -0.41 0.20 -0.23 -0.40 1.00

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Miami (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Public Health Policies and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.