Impact of COVID-19 on Ureteroscopy Management of Urolithiasis: Retrospective Comparative Study Before and After Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery worldwide, potentially impacting the management of urolithiasis. This study aimed to evaluate changes in referral patterns, perioperative care, and surgical outcomes among patients undergoing ureteroscopic treatment for upper ureteral stones at a Japanese institution. A retrospective cohort of 467 patients who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery between March 2018 and May 2022 was analyzed. The patients were divided into pre-pandemic (March 2018–March 2020, n = 244) and post-pandemic (April 2020–May 2022, n = 223) groups. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared. Baseline demographics were similar. After the pandemic onset, preoperative ureteral stenting increased (30.3% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.006), while surgical waiting times (36 days vs. 28 days, p = 0.005) and operative durations (77 min vs. 67 min, p = 0.018) decreased. Referral sources shifted (p = 0.045), with fewer primary care referrals and more from emergency or higher-level hospitals. Stone-free rates (65.6% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.128) and postoperative complication rates were comparable. Despite systemic constraints during the pandemic, timely adaptations in scheduling and perioperative management allowed for the continued delivery of safe and effective ureteroscopic treatment. These findings emphasize the importance of flexible clinical strategies during healthcare crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116101
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of COVID-19 on Ureteroscopy Management of Urolithiasis: Retrospective Comparative Study Before and After Pandemic

Takatoshi Somoto, Yuta Suzuki, Yuka Sugizaki, Takahide Noro et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
1.05
article

Impact of COVID-19 on Ureteroscopy Management of Urolithiasis: Retrospective Comparative Study Before and After Pandemic

Takatoshi Somoto, Yuta Suzuki, Yuka Sugizaki, Takahide Noro, Ryo Oka, Takanobu Utsumi, Naoto Kamiya, Shota Iijima, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Takumi Endo, Naoki Ishitsuka
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery worldwide, potentially impacting the management of urolithiasis. This study aimed to evaluate changes in referral patterns, perioperative care, and surgical outcomes among patients undergoing ureteroscopic treatment for upper ureteral stones at a Japanese institution. A retrospective cohort of 467 patients who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery between March 2018 and May 2022 was analyzed. The patients were divided into pre-pandemic (March 2018–March 2020, n = 244) and post-pandemic (April 2020–May 2022, n = 223) groups. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared. Baseline demographics were similar. After the pandemic onset, preoperative ureteral stenting increased (30.3% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.006), while surgical waiting times (36 days vs. 28 days, p = 0.005) and operative durations (77 min vs. 67 min, p = 0.018) decreased. Referral sources shifted (p = 0.045), with fewer primary care referrals and more from emergency or higher-level hospitals. Stone-free rates (65.6% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.128) and postoperative complication rates were comparable. Despite systemic constraints during the pandemic, timely adaptations in scheduling and perioperative management allowed for the continued delivery of safe and effective ureteroscopic treatment. These findings emphasize the importance of flexible clinical strategies during healthcare crises.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(11)
Toho University (JP), Toho University Medical Center Sakura Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.