Community oncologists' and patients' perspectives on the post-CAR-T care transition: A convergent mixed-methods study.

e23134 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is administered at accredited centers, with (w/) patients (pts) usually transitioning back to their community oncologist (CO) 30 days post-treatment or after acute toxicities resolve. This study explores the challenges faced during this period, from both CO and patient perspectives. Methods: A convergent mixed methods study was conducted between (b/w) March-April 2024. Quantitative aim assessed challenges faced by COs who referred at least 1 pt to Stephenson Cancer Center (SCC) (CAR-T Center) for CAR-T therapy (2019-2024). Online survey w/ hypothetical vignettes were used. COs ranked difficulty of various pt care aspects on a Likert scale from 1 (least) to 5 (most) challenging. Descriptive statistics summarized key challenges. Qualitative aim explored pt challenges. Eligible participants were over 18, referred to SCC, and at least 6 months post-CAR T. Zoom interviews were conducted and assessed for themes. Results: 33/79 (42%) COs completed the survey, w/ 88% from Oklahoma and 12% from neighboring states. 20 pts were interviewed, w/ a mean time of 21 months post-CAR-T therapy. Among responding COs, 79% referred 1-5 pts, 12% referred 6-10, 3% referred > 10 and 6.1% preferred not to answer. Of those referred, 70% reported at least one pt underwent CAR-T therapy. Quantitative and qualitative results were analyzed and integrated using a joint display (Table 1). Regarding post-CAR-T immunization, 82% agreed SCC should set the schedule. 44% viewed SCC as the primary site for administration. The survey inquired about potential steps to cope with challenges during the transition period. COs suggested that a 'Best Practices' handbook (91%) and a CAR-T aftercare webinar (64%) would be helpful. Patients suggested a post-CAR-T therapy timeline and support for immune system optimization. Conclusions: Further research is needed to better understand the pts’ and COs’ experience during the transition period. Implementing resources like a 'Best Practices' handbook, webinar series, and patient education is essential. Convergent mixed-methods analysis - COs' and Pts' perspectives on the Post-CAR-T care. Themes Quantitative Results- Challenges faced by COs (%- Likert Scale) Qualitative Results- Challenges faced by Pts Defining care responsibilities b/w SCC and COs 5: 41 4: 16 3: 22 2: 12 1: 9 Pts were unsure whom to contact (SCC or COs) and were confused by inconsistent guidance Management of RD (relapse disease) 5: 38 4: 28 3: 28 2: 3 1: 3 5 pts were anxious about RD. Others accepted the risk as manageable Communication of events with SCC in post-CAR-T period 5: 13.3 4: 24 3: 13.3 2: 13.3 1: 37 Pts noted occasional communication gaps b/w the SCC and COs but most felt it didn’t impact care Knowledge of administration and timing of re-vaccination 5: 48.3 4: 20.7 3: 13.8 2: 17.2 1: 0 Many pts were unaware/ confused about the need for post-CAR-T vaccinations

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e23134
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community oncologists' and patients' perspectives on the post-CAR-T care transition: A convergent mixed-methods study.

Jennifer Holter Chakrabarty, Kira MacDougall, Sami Ibrahimi, Sara K. Vesely et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Community oncologists' and patients' perspectives on the post-CAR-T care transition: A convergent mixed-methods study.

Jennifer Holter Chakrabarty, Kira MacDougall, Sami Ibrahimi, Sara K. Vesely, Aqsa Ashraf, James N. George, Dee Terrell-Schnorrenberg
article en

Abstract

e23134 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is administered at accredited centers, with (w/) patients (pts) usually transitioning back to their community oncologist (CO) 30 days post-treatment or after acute toxicities resolve. This study explores the challenges faced during this period, from both CO and patient perspectives. Methods: A convergent mixed methods study was conducted between (b/w) March-April 2024. Quantitative aim assessed challenges faced by COs who referred at least 1 pt to Stephenson Cancer Center (SCC) (CAR-T Center) for CAR-T therapy (2019-2024). Online survey w/ hypothetical vignettes were used. COs ranked difficulty of various pt care aspects on a Likert scale from 1 (least) to 5 (most) challenging. Descriptive statistics summarized key challenges. Qualitative aim explored pt challenges. Eligible participants were over 18, referred to SCC, and at least 6 months post-CAR T. Zoom interviews were conducted and assessed for themes. Results: 33/79 (42%) COs completed the survey, w/ 88% from Oklahoma and 12% from neighboring states. 20 pts were interviewed, w/ a mean time of 21 months post-CAR-T therapy. Among responding COs, 79% referred 1-5 pts, 12% referred 6-10, 3% referred > 10 and 6.1% preferred not to answer. Of those referred, 70% reported at least one pt underwent CAR-T therapy. Quantitative and qualitative results were analyzed and integrated using a joint display (Table 1). Regarding post-CAR-T immunization, 82% agreed SCC should set the schedule. 44% viewed SCC as the primary site for administration. The survey inquired about potential steps to cope with challenges during the transition period. COs suggested that a 'Best Practices' handbook (91%) and a CAR-T aftercare webinar (64%) would be helpful. Patients suggested a post-CAR-T therapy timeline and support for immune system optimization. Conclusions: Further research is needed to better understand the pts’ and COs’ experience during the transition period. Implementing resources like a 'Best Practices' handbook, webinar series, and patient education is essential. Convergent mixed-methods analysis - COs' and Pts' perspectives on the Post-CAR-T care. Themes Quantitative Results- Challenges faced by COs (%- Likert Scale) Qualitative Results- Challenges faced by Pts Defining care responsibilities b/w SCC and COs 5: 41 4: 16 3: 22 2: 12 1: 9 Pts were unsure whom to contact (SCC or COs) and were confused by inconsistent guidance Management of RD (relapse disease) 5: 38 4: 28 3: 28 2: 3 1: 3 5 pts were anxious about RD. Others accepted the risk as manageable Communication of events with SCC in post-CAR-T period 5: 13.3 4: 24 3: 13.3 2: 13.3 1: 37 Pts noted occasional communication gaps b/w the SCC and COs but most felt it didn’t impact care Knowledge of administration and timing of re-vaccination 5: 48.3 4: 20.7 3: 13.8 2: 17.2 1: 0 Many pts were unaware/ confused about the need for post-CAR-T vaccinations

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Bellevue College (US), CHRISTUS St. Vincent Regional Cancer Center (US), University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.