Oncologists’ happiness at work and integrative oncology.

e23127 Background: Oncology care teams often face long hours and high patient volumes in a profession that is emotionally and mentally demanding. Whole person cancer care, guided by a wider lens of what matters most to patients, and the integration of complementary services is linked to happiness at work, specifically for oncologists. Methods: A national survey was used to assess oncologists’ awareness, perceptions, and uptake of integrative and whole person supportive oncology services. Respondents were sampled from a panel of community and academic practices across the US, with the requirement that they spend at least 30% of their time in direct care of cancer patients and are familiar with the complementary offerings of their institution or system (response of 4–7 on a 7-point scale). The survey was repeated annually from 2022 to 2024. Survey invitations were sent to 5,200–5,500 oncologists per year. Results: More than 150 oncologists completed the survey annually, with a 40% overlap each year. In 2024, 95% of institutions or systems surveyed offered at least one of 12 complementary therapies, a statistically significant increase from 86% in 2022. In the 2024 data, oncologists were split into two cohorts using a 7-point scale based on agreement with the statement “I am very happy at my place of work.” The two cohorts were “Very Happy at Work” (6–7) or “Neutral/Unhappy at Work” (1–5). Oncologists who were Very Happy were more often employed at locations where at least one complementary therapy was offered (table row 1, p = 0.16). In addition, Very Happy oncologists worked with staff financial counselors and physical therapists more than Neutral/Unhappy oncologists (rows 2–3). Finally, Very Happy oncologists noted that not having time to fit in complementary therapy discussions with patients was significantly less of a barrier (row 4) and considered the patient’s caregiver as influential to decision-making significantly more compared to the Neutral/Unhappy oncologists (row 5). Conclusions: Prioritizing whole person care by integrating complementary therapies and supportive services, employing team-based strategic hiring practices, and encouraging shared decision-making with patients and caregivers provides a path to greater joy in work for oncologists. 2024 Survey Question Response Label Very Happy ( n = 76) Neutral/Unhappy ( n = 75) P- Value( t test, 95% confidence) 1 Institution or system offers at least one complementary therapy % Yes 98%; CI 95–100% 92%; CI 83–100% 0.16 2 Financial counselor on staff full-time % Yes 92%; CI 83–100%( n = 21) 66%; CI 41–91%( n = 21) <0.01 3 Physical therapist on staff full-time % Yes 87%; CI 74–100%( n = 29) 63%; CI 35–91%( n = 31) 0.12 4 Do not have time to fit complementary therapy discussion into patient conversations % Yes 9%; CI 1–17% 31%; CI 17–44% <0.01 5 Patient’s caregiver is influential in my decisions about patient management % 6 or 7, 7-point scale Agree 42%; CI 26–57%Mean: 5.2 22%; CI 11–33%Mean: 4.5 <0.01

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e23127
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oncologists’ happiness at work and integrative oncology.

Jennifer Wright Dorr, Wayne B. Jonas, Terri Crudup, Vaishali Desai Palommella et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

Oncologists’ happiness at work and integrative oncology.

Jennifer Wright Dorr, Wayne B. Jonas, Terri Crudup, Vaishali Desai Palommella, Bruce Cowgill, Alyssa McManamon, Sharzad Shojaian
article en

Abstract

e23127 Background: Oncology care teams often face long hours and high patient volumes in a profession that is emotionally and mentally demanding. Whole person cancer care, guided by a wider lens of what matters most to patients, and the integration of complementary services is linked to happiness at work, specifically for oncologists. Methods: A national survey was used to assess oncologists’ awareness, perceptions, and uptake of integrative and whole person supportive oncology services. Respondents were sampled from a panel of community and academic practices across the US, with the requirement that they spend at least 30% of their time in direct care of cancer patients and are familiar with the complementary offerings of their institution or system (response of 4–7 on a 7-point scale). The survey was repeated annually from 2022 to 2024. Survey invitations were sent to 5,200–5,500 oncologists per year. Results: More than 150 oncologists completed the survey annually, with a 40% overlap each year. In 2024, 95% of institutions or systems surveyed offered at least one of 12 complementary therapies, a statistically significant increase from 86% in 2022. In the 2024 data, oncologists were split into two cohorts using a 7-point scale based on agreement with the statement “I am very happy at my place of work.” The two cohorts were “Very Happy at Work” (6–7) or “Neutral/Unhappy at Work” (1–5). Oncologists who were Very Happy were more often employed at locations where at least one complementary therapy was offered (table row 1, p = 0.16). In addition, Very Happy oncologists worked with staff financial counselors and physical therapists more than Neutral/Unhappy oncologists (rows 2–3). Finally, Very Happy oncologists noted that not having time to fit in complementary therapy discussions with patients was significantly less of a barrier (row 4) and considered the patient’s caregiver as influential to decision-making significantly more compared to the Neutral/Unhappy oncologists (row 5). Conclusions: Prioritizing whole person care by integrating complementary therapies and supportive services, employing team-based strategic hiring practices, and encouraging shared decision-making with patients and caregivers provides a path to greater joy in work for oncologists. 2024 Survey Question Response Label Very Happy ( n = 76) Neutral/Unhappy ( n = 75) P- Value( t test, 95% confidence) 1 Institution or system offers at least one complementary therapy % Yes 98%; CI 95–100% 92%; CI 83–100% 0.16 2 Financial counselor on staff full-time % Yes 92%; CI 83–100%( n = 21) 66%; CI 41–91%( n = 21) <0.01 3 Physical therapist on staff full-time % Yes 87%; CI 74–100%( n = 29) 63%; CI 35–91%( n = 31) 0.12 4 Do not have time to fit complementary therapy discussion into patient conversations % Yes 9%; CI 1–17% 31%; CI 17–44% <0.01 5 Patient’s caregiver is influential in my decisions about patient management % 6 or 7, 7-point scale Agree 42%; CI 26–57%Mean: 5.2 22%; CI 11–33%Mean: 4.5 <0.01

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Health Outcomes Solutions (United States) (US), IQVIA (United States) (US), Dayton VA Medical Center (US), Healing Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.