A global scoping review of barriers and strategies to implementation of geriatric assessment in older adults with cancer.

e13851 Background: There is a lack of practical application of evidence synthesized from the systematic exploration and summarization of barriers and strategies for implementing Geriatric Assessment (GA) in older adults with cancer on a global scale. This systematic scoping review aimed to map out and synthesize the evidence on barriers and strategies for GA implementation in older adults with cancer. Methods: A comprehensive, systematic search ofseven electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Proquest, Scopus, and Ageline) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles, from 1 st January 2013 to 30 th October 2024. Two researchers independently screened 2,871 records, extracted relevant data from 34 full-text study reports and conducted content analyses to synthesize the findings. Results: The 34 articles were classified into the following categories: cross-sectional surveys (n = 16), observational cohort studies (n = 7), randomized controlled trials (n = 3), single-arm intervention trials (n = 4), qualitative studies (n = 2) and mixed method (online surveys and interviews) (n = 2). The included articles were from 12 countries (United States (n = 7), The Netherlands (n = 5), Canada (n = 3), Japan (n = 4), France (n = 2), Australia (n = 3), United Kingdom (n = 2), Belgium (n = 1), Brazil (n = 1), India (n = 1), Mexico (n = 1), Portugal (n = 1)), with one global collaboration. Most study reports (29/34) were published in the past five years. Five overarching themes encompassing 27 barriers to implementing GA in older adults with cancer were identified and summarized. Additionally, 17 implementation strategies were extracted and synthesized through content analysis of the included articles. These findings informed the development of the initial draft of the Barriers and Strategies Checklist Template for Geriatric Assessment (BeST-GA), providing a comprehensive, consolidated summary of the scoping review's results. Conclusions: The literature confirms that barriers affecting GA implementation in older adults with cancer and the strategies to overcome them are unique to individual settings and require a tailored approach. The draft BeST-GA checklist should be further tested and may be used as a first step to assess the setting during the planning phase of GA implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e13851
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A global scoping review of barriers and strategies to implementation of geriatric assessment in older adults with cancer.

William Dale, Oluwaseyifunmi Andi Agbejule, Lawrence Kasherman, Kristen R. Haase et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Frailty in Older Adults
article

A global scoping review of barriers and strategies to implementation of geriatric assessment in older adults with cancer.

William Dale, Oluwaseyifunmi Andi Agbejule, Lawrence Kasherman, Kristen R. Haase, Raymond J. Chan, Chad Yixian Han, Jolyn Johal, Martine Puts, Anna Rachelle Mislang, Catherine C. Paterson
article en

Abstract

e13851 Background: There is a lack of practical application of evidence synthesized from the systematic exploration and summarization of barriers and strategies for implementing Geriatric Assessment (GA) in older adults with cancer on a global scale. This systematic scoping review aimed to map out and synthesize the evidence on barriers and strategies for GA implementation in older adults with cancer. Methods: A comprehensive, systematic search ofseven electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Proquest, Scopus, and Ageline) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles, from 1 st January 2013 to 30 th October 2024. Two researchers independently screened 2,871 records, extracted relevant data from 34 full-text study reports and conducted content analyses to synthesize the findings. Results: The 34 articles were classified into the following categories: cross-sectional surveys (n = 16), observational cohort studies (n = 7), randomized controlled trials (n = 3), single-arm intervention trials (n = 4), qualitative studies (n = 2) and mixed method (online surveys and interviews) (n = 2). The included articles were from 12 countries (United States (n = 7), The Netherlands (n = 5), Canada (n = 3), Japan (n = 4), France (n = 2), Australia (n = 3), United Kingdom (n = 2), Belgium (n = 1), Brazil (n = 1), India (n = 1), Mexico (n = 1), Portugal (n = 1)), with one global collaboration. Most study reports (29/34) were published in the past five years. Five overarching themes encompassing 27 barriers to implementing GA in older adults with cancer were identified and summarized. Additionally, 17 implementation strategies were extracted and synthesized through content analysis of the included articles. These findings informed the development of the initial draft of the Barriers and Strategies Checklist Template for Geriatric Assessment (BeST-GA), providing a comprehensive, consolidated summary of the scoping review's results. Conclusions: The literature confirms that barriers affecting GA implementation in older adults with cancer and the strategies to overcome them are unique to individual settings and require a tailored approach. The draft BeST-GA checklist should be further tested and may be used as a first step to assess the setting during the planning phase of GA implementation.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Flinders University (AU), University of Toronto (CA), Wollongong Hospital (AU), Flinders Medical Centre (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.