Cancer provider experiences with telehealth.

e13888 Background: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a surge in the use of telehealth in cancer care. However, there is limited data on cancer care provider experiences with telehealth. We surveyed surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists in an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center in southern California about their experiences with telehealth. Methods: All 86 practicing cancer care providers (MDs and Advanced Practice Providers) at the UC San Diego Health Moores Cancer Center were invited to participate in an online survey about their experience with telehealth including factors that influence their use of telehealth and their confidence in their ability to assess patients using telehealth alone. Of those invited, 49 (57%) completed the survey: 19 (39%) surgical oncologists, 16 (33%) medical oncologists, 10 (20%) radiation oncologists, and 4 (8%) palliative care physicians. Results: The median age of the cancer care providers was 45.0 (IQR = 40-50) years. Most cancer care providers were male (61%), non-Hispanic (94%), and White (67%). Overall, 81% of providers found it easy to set up a telehealth visit. Almost all providers found the audio and video quality to be average or above average. Most (85%) also reported that patients could effectively communicate their questions and concerns by telehealth alone. Only half of cancer care providers (51%) were confident in their ability to conduct a physical examination by telehealth and considered physical examination as a driving factor for an in-person visit. By specialty, 47% of surgeons were confident in their ability to conduct a physical examination prior to surgery, but 74% were confident in their ability to assess a patient after surgery using telehealth alone. Most medical oncologists (81%) and radiation oncologists (80%), in contrast, were confident in in their ability to assess a patient before or during chemotherapy or before or during radiation therapy, respectively. Conclusions: Despite rapid shifts in the utilization of telehealth, cancer care providers are satisfied with telehealth and endorse it as an adequate means of providing surgical, medical, and radiation related care to cancer patients. However, confidence in being able to assess a patient by telehealth alone varies by specialty with surgeons being less confident in their ability to conduct a physical examination prior to surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e13888
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cancer provider experiences with telehealth.

Humberto Parada, Sreenivasulu Chintala, James Don Murphy, Hala Madanat et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Cancer provider experiences with telehealth.

Humberto Parada, Sreenivasulu Chintala, James Don Murphy, Hala Madanat, Aditya Bagrodia, Richard M. Cripps, Juan Javier‐Desloges, Marı́a Elena Martı́nez
article en

Abstract

e13888 Background: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a surge in the use of telehealth in cancer care. However, there is limited data on cancer care provider experiences with telehealth. We surveyed surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists in an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center in southern California about their experiences with telehealth. Methods: All 86 practicing cancer care providers (MDs and Advanced Practice Providers) at the UC San Diego Health Moores Cancer Center were invited to participate in an online survey about their experience with telehealth including factors that influence their use of telehealth and their confidence in their ability to assess patients using telehealth alone. Of those invited, 49 (57%) completed the survey: 19 (39%) surgical oncologists, 16 (33%) medical oncologists, 10 (20%) radiation oncologists, and 4 (8%) palliative care physicians. Results: The median age of the cancer care providers was 45.0 (IQR = 40-50) years. Most cancer care providers were male (61%), non-Hispanic (94%), and White (67%). Overall, 81% of providers found it easy to set up a telehealth visit. Almost all providers found the audio and video quality to be average or above average. Most (85%) also reported that patients could effectively communicate their questions and concerns by telehealth alone. Only half of cancer care providers (51%) were confident in their ability to conduct a physical examination by telehealth and considered physical examination as a driving factor for an in-person visit. By specialty, 47% of surgeons were confident in their ability to conduct a physical examination prior to surgery, but 74% were confident in their ability to assess a patient after surgery using telehealth alone. Most medical oncologists (81%) and radiation oncologists (80%), in contrast, were confident in in their ability to assess a patient before or during chemotherapy or before or during radiation therapy, respectively. Conclusions: Despite rapid shifts in the utilization of telehealth, cancer care providers are satisfied with telehealth and endorse it as an adequate means of providing surgical, medical, and radiation related care to cancer patients. However, confidence in being able to assess a patient by telehealth alone varies by specialty with surgeons being less confident in their ability to conduct a physical examination prior to surgery.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
San Diego State University (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.