Ten simple rules for queer data collection and analysis by STEM researchers

Queer people are still underrepresented both as STEM researchers and participants, partially due to a dearth of accurate data on this demographic. The lack of consideration for queer identities in data collection and dissemination causes a vicious cycle of exclusion. To address this invisibility, it is important to collect and report data in an inclusive and accurate manner across all areas of research, including in studies that are not specifically focused on queer populations. However, STEM researchers are often unsure of how to properly collect data in a manner that fairly represents queer people. We have developed a list of Ten Simple rules to aid researchers to perform data collection on queer individuals, focusing on study design and data dissemination. We address several issues in queer data, such as language use, dealing with small populations, and balancing demands. We also discuss how to extend this inclusive practice for studies on animal populations. These rules are aimed at anybody surveying populations which may contain queer individuals, including for example research studies and inclusivity surveys for conferences. By providing practical tips, we hope to alleviate insecurity and confusion around this topic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013091
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ten simple rules for queer data collection and analysis by STEM researchers

Dori M. Grijseels, Keerthana Iyer, David Pagliaccio, Bittu Kaveri Rajaraman et al.
2 citations
PLoS Computational Biology
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
3.76
article

Ten simple rules for queer data collection and analysis by STEM researchers

Dori M. Grijseels, Keerthana Iyer, David Pagliaccio, Bittu Kaveri Rajaraman, Eitan Schechtman, Melanie Ortiz Alvarez de la Campa, M. Banqueri, Lee Hanlin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Queer people are still underrepresented both as STEM researchers and participants, partially due to a dearth of accurate data on this demographic. The lack of consideration for queer identities in data collection and dissemination causes a vicious cycle of exclusion. To address this invisibility, it is important to collect and report data in an inclusive and accurate manner across all areas of research, including in studies that are not specifically focused on queer populations. However, STEM researchers are often unsure of how to properly collect data in a manner that fairly represents queer people. We have developed a list of Ten Simple rules to aid researchers to perform data collection on queer individuals, focusing on study design and data dissemination. We address several issues in queer data, such as language use, dealing with small populations, and balancing demands. We also discuss how to extend this inclusive practice for studies on animal populations. These rules are aimed at anybody surveying populations which may contain queer individuals, including for example research studies and inclusivity surveys for conferences. By providing practical tips, we hope to alleviate insecurity and confusion around this topic.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 21(5)
University of California, Irvine (US), Brown University (US), New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute (US), Ashoka University (IN), University of California San Diego (US), Max Planck Institute for Brain Research (DE), FENS Kavli Network of Excellence (BE), New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.