Attitudes of Jordanian Medical Students Toward People With Mental Illness

Background For people with mental illnesses, the stigma in the healthcare system and among healthcare providers has been identified as a major barrier to accessing treatment and achieving recovery, as well as poor physical treatment. This nationwide cross-sectional study assessed stigma toward mental illnesses among medical students in Jordan. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and patterns of stigma toward mental illnesses among medical students in Jordan and examine the influence of psychiatric education and specialty preferences on stigma levels. Methodology A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted between April 21 and April 30, 2021, targeting medical students from all six medical schools in Jordan. Participants completed a validated, structured, electronically distributed questionnaire assessing attitudes toward mental illness. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified three key domains, i.e., (1) Social Acceptance, (2) Policies to Promote Community Integration, and (3) Beliefs about Treatability of Mental Illness. Demographic information included age, academic year (pre-clinical vs. clinical), and psychiatric training exposure (classroom and/or clinical). Data analysis was performed using SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A total of 2,104 medical students participated. The age distribution was as follows: 24.8% were aged 18-19.9 years, 43.6% were aged 20-22.9 years, and 31.7% were aged ≥23 years. Participants included both pre-clinical and clinical-year students from diverse academic institutions across Jordan. Results Clinical-year students reported significantly higher (less stigmatizing) scores in all three domains compared to pre-clinical students (p < 0.001). Those exposed to both classroom and clinical psychiatry training showed more favorable attitudes than those with limited or no exposure. Students interested in psychiatry specialization exhibited lower (more stigmatizing) scores in the treatability and community integration domains compared to peers interested in surgical (p < 0.001, p = 0.003) and medical specialties (p < 0.001, p = 0.001). Conclusions While a majority of students expressed social acceptance and supported community integration of individuals with mental illness, stigma persisted in perceptions of treatability. Greater exposure to psychiatric education correlates with reduced stigma. Unexpectedly, students inclined toward psychiatry showed more stigmatizing views in some domains, warranting further investigation. These findings highlight the importance of enhancing mental health education across the medical curriculum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.84982
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attitudes of Jordanian Medical Students Toward People With Mental Illness

Osama A. Zitoun, Robert A. Rosenheck, Rayan M. Joudeh, Ahmed A. Khalil et al.
Cureus
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Attitudes of Jordanian Medical Students Toward People With Mental Illness

Osama A. Zitoun, Robert A. Rosenheck, Rayan M. Joudeh, Ahmed A. Khalil, Adnan Raed Alnaser, Abdelkader Battah, Dana W Al-Mansour, Yazan Faraj, Anas Y El-Massad, Mahmoud Kashoua
article en

Abstract

Background For people with mental illnesses, the stigma in the healthcare system and among healthcare providers has been identified as a major barrier to accessing treatment and achieving recovery, as well as poor physical treatment. This nationwide cross-sectional study assessed stigma toward mental illnesses among medical students in Jordan. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and patterns of stigma toward mental illnesses among medical students in Jordan and examine the influence of psychiatric education and specialty preferences on stigma levels. Methodology A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted between April 21 and April 30, 2021, targeting medical students from all six medical schools in Jordan. Participants completed a validated, structured, electronically distributed questionnaire assessing attitudes toward mental illness. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified three key domains, i.e., (1) Social Acceptance, (2) Policies to Promote Community Integration, and (3) Beliefs about Treatability of Mental Illness. Demographic information included age, academic year (pre-clinical vs. clinical), and psychiatric training exposure (classroom and/or clinical). Data analysis was performed using SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A total of 2,104 medical students participated. The age distribution was as follows: 24.8% were aged 18-19.9 years, 43.6% were aged 20-22.9 years, and 31.7% were aged ≥23 years. Participants included both pre-clinical and clinical-year students from diverse academic institutions across Jordan. Results Clinical-year students reported significantly higher (less stigmatizing) scores in all three domains compared to pre-clinical students (p < 0.001). Those exposed to both classroom and clinical psychiatry training showed more favorable attitudes than those with limited or no exposure. Students interested in psychiatry specialization exhibited lower (more stigmatizing) scores in the treatability and community integration domains compared to peers interested in surgical (p < 0.001, p = 0.003) and medical specialties (p < 0.001, p = 0.001). Conclusions While a majority of students expressed social acceptance and supported community integration of individuals with mental illness, stigma persisted in perceptions of treatability. Greater exposure to psychiatric education correlates with reduced stigma. Unexpectedly, students inclined toward psychiatry showed more stigmatizing views in some domains, warranting further investigation. These findings highlight the importance of enhancing mental health education across the medical curriculum.

CureusVol. 17(5)
Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.