Real-world outcomes of perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma assessed using the NCDB.

e16085 Background: In the CROSS trial, chemoradiation therapy (CRT) prior to esophagectomy resulted in a marginal survival benefit in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma and a larger benefit in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In the FLOT4 trial, chemotherapy plus surgery followed by more chemotherapy showed a significant survival benefit in patients with locally advanced GEJ cancers without the use of radiation. Therefore, we wished to examine whether the addition of preoperative radiation to chemotherapy and esophagectomy in patients with locally advanced esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinomas yielded benefits using real-world data. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for adult patients with stage II–IV adenocarcinoma of the non-cervical esophagus or GEJ/ gastric cardia, who were diagnosed with invasive adenocarcinoma between 2006 to 2021 and who had esophagectomy as part of multi-disciplinary treatment (n = 15677). The patients were divided into 2 groups. The CRT group comprised patients who received preoperative chemotherapy plus radiation therapy followed by esophagectomy, and the POC (perioperative chemotherapy) group comprised patients who received chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Comparisons were made after propensity-score matching (PSM) (2:1) for clinical stage, age (> 60 and ≤60), sex, and Charlson-Deyo score. Chi-square, Wilcoxon, and Kaplan-Meier tests were applied. Results: After PSM, the CRT group contained 608 patients, and the POC group contained 304 patients. Male patients accounted for 86.5% of patients in each group, and median patient age was 61 years (IQR 13). Stage distribution was similar between the PSM groups (stage II, 23.4%; stage III, 56.2%; and stage IV 20.4%). Median overall survival was significantly better in the POC group as compared with the CRT group (POC 56.7 months, 95% CI 44.6-69.4 vs CRT 39.7 months, 95% CI: 33.5-48.3 p = 0.002). Conclusions: Perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery leads to better outcomes for patients with esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma as compared with chemoradiation therapy plus surgery. In fact, the addition of preoperative radiation negatively impacted survival in our analysis of real-world data from a large database of patients treated in the United States. Larger randomized control trials need to validate these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16085
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world outcomes of perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma assessed using the NCDB.

Christine A. Welch, Anna Chudnovets, Ghulam Abbas, Sandeep Kashyap et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Real-world outcomes of perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma assessed using the NCDB.

Christine A. Welch, Anna Chudnovets, Ghulam Abbas, Sandeep Kashyap, Jennifer Collins, Anahat Kaur, Argenis Herrera
article en

Abstract

e16085 Background: In the CROSS trial, chemoradiation therapy (CRT) prior to esophagectomy resulted in a marginal survival benefit in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma and a larger benefit in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In the FLOT4 trial, chemotherapy plus surgery followed by more chemotherapy showed a significant survival benefit in patients with locally advanced GEJ cancers without the use of radiation. Therefore, we wished to examine whether the addition of preoperative radiation to chemotherapy and esophagectomy in patients with locally advanced esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinomas yielded benefits using real-world data. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for adult patients with stage II–IV adenocarcinoma of the non-cervical esophagus or GEJ/ gastric cardia, who were diagnosed with invasive adenocarcinoma between 2006 to 2021 and who had esophagectomy as part of multi-disciplinary treatment (n = 15677). The patients were divided into 2 groups. The CRT group comprised patients who received preoperative chemotherapy plus radiation therapy followed by esophagectomy, and the POC (perioperative chemotherapy) group comprised patients who received chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Comparisons were made after propensity-score matching (PSM) (2:1) for clinical stage, age (> 60 and ≤60), sex, and Charlson-Deyo score. Chi-square, Wilcoxon, and Kaplan-Meier tests were applied. Results: After PSM, the CRT group contained 608 patients, and the POC group contained 304 patients. Male patients accounted for 86.5% of patients in each group, and median patient age was 61 years (IQR 13). Stage distribution was similar between the PSM groups (stage II, 23.4%; stage III, 56.2%; and stage IV 20.4%). Median overall survival was significantly better in the POC group as compared with the CRT group (POC 56.7 months, 95% CI 44.6-69.4 vs CRT 39.7 months, 95% CI: 33.5-48.3 p = 0.002). Conclusions: Perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery leads to better outcomes for patients with esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma as compared with chemoradiation therapy plus surgery. In fact, the addition of preoperative radiation negatively impacted survival in our analysis of real-world data from a large database of patients treated in the United States. Larger randomized control trials need to validate these results.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Charleston Area Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.