Real-world efficacy of first-line chemotherapy plus nivolumab in gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma patients: The ORACLE study.

e16087 Background: Nivolumab (NIV) plus chemotherapy (CHT) is the standard first-line treatment for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5, based on phase 3 trials. Real-world data are essential to validate these results. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study (2022-2024) on 90 patients (pts) with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with first-line CHT plus NIV. Clinical pathological features are described in Table 1. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). We assessed treatment response using the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). Results: At a median follow-up of 7 months (m), median OS was 14.6 m (95%CI: 11.9–21.24), and median PFS was 11.78 m (95%CI: 7.6–15.6). ORR was 46.7%, and DCR was 76.7%. Responders (CR/PR) had better outcomes than non-responders (SD/PD): median PFS of 15.6 m (95%CI: 11.5–25.5) vs. 4.3 m (95% CI: 3.2–9) (p < 0.0001) and median OS not reached vs. 10.2 m (95%CI: 6.8–13.9) (p < 0.0001). Early progressors (PD within 3–6 m) had worse outcomes, with median OS of 5.5 m (95%CI: 3.9–10.2) and median PFS of 2.3 m (95%CI: 1.9–3) vs. OS of 21.2 m (95%CI: 13.8–21.2) and PFS of 15.6 m (95% CI: 11.5–19) in other pts (p < 0.0001). Immune-related toxicity occurred in 21 pts (23.3%), leading to treatment discontinuation in 6 cases (7.1%). Conclusions: This real-world study confirmed the efficacy and safety of NIV plus CHT in advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5. Response to treatment emerged as a key prognostic factor for survival. Further follow-up is needed to validate these findings and identify predictive factors for response and progression. Clinicopathologic features. Clinicopathologic features N=90(%) Age>50≤50 78 (86.7)12 (13.3) GenderMF 58 (64.4)32 (35.6) ECOG PS0-1≥2 84 (93.3)6 (6.7) Primary tumor locationstomachcardia/GEJ 48 (53.3)42 (46.7) Primary tumor resectionYN 32 (35.5)58 (64.4) Histology Type IntestinalDiffuse signet ring cellsNot Assessed 23 (25.5)35 (38.8)19 (21.1)32 (35.5) MMR/MSI status pMMR/MSSdMMR/MSI-HNot Assessed 76 (84.4)10 (11.1)4 (4.5) PD-L1 CPS5≤CPS<10≥10 27 (30)57 (63.3) Metastasis Siteslivernodeslungperitoneumother 24 (26.7)38 (42.2)5 (5.5)24 (26.7)9 (10) Chemotherapy regimenFOLFOXXELOX5FU 81 (90)5 (5.5)4 (4.5)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16087
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world efficacy of first-line chemotherapy plus nivolumab in gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma patients: The ORACLE study.

Andrea Pretta, L. Bartalini, Mario Scartozzi, Riccardo Giampieri et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Real-world efficacy of first-line chemotherapy plus nivolumab in gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma patients: The ORACLE study.

Andrea Pretta, L. Bartalini, Mario Scartozzi, Riccardo Giampieri, Paola Di Nardo, Francesca Salani, Alessandro Pastorino, Silvia Ortolani, Lorenzo Fornaro, Dario Spanu, Vincenzo Formica, Pina Ziranu, Jessica Lucchetti, Sabina Murgioni, Gianmarco Ricagno, Annamaria Carreras, Giuseppe Aprile, S. Sperotto, Emanuela Di Giacomo, Anna Pessino
article en

Abstract

e16087 Background: Nivolumab (NIV) plus chemotherapy (CHT) is the standard first-line treatment for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5, based on phase 3 trials. Real-world data are essential to validate these results. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study (2022-2024) on 90 patients (pts) with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with first-line CHT plus NIV. Clinical pathological features are described in Table 1. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). We assessed treatment response using the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). Results: At a median follow-up of 7 months (m), median OS was 14.6 m (95%CI: 11.9–21.24), and median PFS was 11.78 m (95%CI: 7.6–15.6). ORR was 46.7%, and DCR was 76.7%. Responders (CR/PR) had better outcomes than non-responders (SD/PD): median PFS of 15.6 m (95%CI: 11.5–25.5) vs. 4.3 m (95% CI: 3.2–9) (p < 0.0001) and median OS not reached vs. 10.2 m (95%CI: 6.8–13.9) (p < 0.0001). Early progressors (PD within 3–6 m) had worse outcomes, with median OS of 5.5 m (95%CI: 3.9–10.2) and median PFS of 2.3 m (95%CI: 1.9–3) vs. OS of 21.2 m (95%CI: 13.8–21.2) and PFS of 15.6 m (95% CI: 11.5–19) in other pts (p < 0.0001). Immune-related toxicity occurred in 21 pts (23.3%), leading to treatment discontinuation in 6 cases (7.1%). Conclusions: This real-world study confirmed the efficacy and safety of NIV plus CHT in advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5. Response to treatment emerged as a key prognostic factor for survival. Further follow-up is needed to validate these findings and identify predictive factors for response and progression. Clinicopathologic features. Clinicopathologic features N=90(%) Age>50≤50 78 (86.7)12 (13.3) GenderMF 58 (64.4)32 (35.6) ECOG PS0-1≥2 84 (93.3)6 (6.7) Primary tumor locationstomachcardia/GEJ 48 (53.3)42 (46.7) Primary tumor resectionYN 32 (35.5)58 (64.4) Histology Type IntestinalDiffuse signet ring cellsNot Assessed 23 (25.5)35 (38.8)19 (21.1)32 (35.5) MMR/MSI status pMMR/MSSdMMR/MSI-HNot Assessed 76 (84.4)10 (11.1)4 (4.5) PD-L1 CPS5≤CPS<10≥10 27 (30)57 (63.3) Metastasis Siteslivernodeslungperitoneumother 24 (26.7)38 (42.2)5 (5.5)24 (26.7)9 (10) Chemotherapy regimenFOLFOXXELOX5FU 81 (90)5 (5.5)4 (4.5)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Marche Polytechnic University (IT), University of Udine (IT), University of Padua (IT), University of Cagliari (IT), Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), Ospedale San Bortolo (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.