Comparative efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A network meta-analysis.

e16079 Background: Integrating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with conventional chemotherapy has significantly transformed oncology, creating new treatment standards for various cancers. This comprehensive network meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of various ICI and chemotherapy combinations in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: This network meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines. We searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC who received at least one immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Thirteen RCTs encompassing 6907 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Outcomes assessed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events. Results: Combination therapies involving ICIs and chemotherapy generally outperformed chemotherapy alone. For overall survival, the NMA indicated that Cetuximab plus chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of death at 6 months (HR = 0.3750, 95%CI [0.1676; 0.8389]; p-value = 0.0170), while Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was most effective at 12 and 18 months in comparison to chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.6588, 95%CI [0.5581; 0.7776]; p-value < 0.0001) and (HR = 0.8114, 95%CI [0.7237; 0.9098]; p-value = 0.0003), respectively. At 24 months, Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab was most effective (HR = 0.8942, 95%CI [0.8442; 0.9472]; p-value = 0.0001). For PFS, Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy was most effective at 6 months (HR = 0.7610, 95%CI [0.6665; 0.8689] p-value < 0.0001), and Sintilimab plus chemotherapy at 12 months (HR = 0.8472, 95%CI [0.7946; 0.9032]; p-value < 0.0001). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was most effective at 18 and 24 months (HR = 0.9087, 95%CI [0.8632; 0.9567]; p-value = 0.0003) and (HR = 0.9596, 95%CI [0.9328; 0.9871]; p-value = 0.0043), respectively. Safety profiles varied, with immune-related adverse events more common in treatments involving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusions: Combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy improve survival in advanced or metastatic ESCC compared to chemotherapy alone. These findings support the use of novel immunotherapeutic agents to enhance patient outcomes, warranting further research to optimize treatment regimens and manage adverse events effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16079
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A network meta-analysis.

A. Yousef, Ahmad R. Al‐Qudimat, Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla, Ali Saad Al‐Shammari et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Comparative efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A network meta-analysis.

A. Yousef, Ahmad R. Al‐Qudimat, Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla, Ali Saad Al‐Shammari, Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed, Ahmed Y. Azzam, Maryam Shahzad, Laila Shalabi, Ahmed Mahmoud Eltelt, Rahmeh Al-Asmar, Shanmukh Sai Pavan Lingamsetty, Md Rafiqul Islam, Sherif Sayed, Yaqeen Alsheyab
article en

Abstract

e16079 Background: Integrating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with conventional chemotherapy has significantly transformed oncology, creating new treatment standards for various cancers. This comprehensive network meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of various ICI and chemotherapy combinations in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: This network meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines. We searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC who received at least one immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Thirteen RCTs encompassing 6907 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Outcomes assessed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events. Results: Combination therapies involving ICIs and chemotherapy generally outperformed chemotherapy alone. For overall survival, the NMA indicated that Cetuximab plus chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of death at 6 months (HR = 0.3750, 95%CI [0.1676; 0.8389]; p-value = 0.0170), while Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was most effective at 12 and 18 months in comparison to chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.6588, 95%CI [0.5581; 0.7776]; p-value < 0.0001) and (HR = 0.8114, 95%CI [0.7237; 0.9098]; p-value = 0.0003), respectively. At 24 months, Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab was most effective (HR = 0.8942, 95%CI [0.8442; 0.9472]; p-value = 0.0001). For PFS, Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy was most effective at 6 months (HR = 0.7610, 95%CI [0.6665; 0.8689] p-value < 0.0001), and Sintilimab plus chemotherapy at 12 months (HR = 0.8472, 95%CI [0.7946; 0.9032]; p-value < 0.0001). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was most effective at 18 and 24 months (HR = 0.9087, 95%CI [0.8632; 0.9567]; p-value = 0.0003) and (HR = 0.9596, 95%CI [0.9328; 0.9871]; p-value = 0.0043), respectively. Safety profiles varied, with immune-related adverse events more common in treatments involving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusions: Combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy improve survival in advanced or metastatic ESCC compared to chemotherapy alone. These findings support the use of novel immunotherapeutic agents to enhance patient outcomes, warranting further research to optimize treatment regimens and manage adverse events effectively.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Jordan (JO), Montefiore Medical Center (US), Baghdad Medical City (IQ), Mamata Medical College (IN), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College (BD), University of Gharyan (LY), Hamad Medical Corporation (QA), Menoufia University (EG), Alexandria University (EG), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.