Epidemiology and outcomes of sepsis in patients hospitalized with esophageal cancer: A nationwide analysis.

e16068 Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) originates in the lining of the esophagus and often necessitates hospitalization in advanced stages. Sepsis, a severe and potentially fatal complication, poses significant challenges for hospitalized patients with EC. This study investigates and compares the outcomes of EC hospitalizations complicated by sepsis to enhance understanding and improve patient care strategies. Methods: Hospitalizations with a diagnosis of esophageal cancer were identified from the 2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) using ICD-10 codes. Patients were categorized based on the presence or absence of sepsis. Sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities were analyzed. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes included complication rates. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess associations, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. Results: Among the 34,030 hospitalizations for esophageal cancer, 4,190 (12.3%) involved sepsis. Patients in the sepsis group were older, with a mean age of 68.1 years compared to 67.3 years in those without sepsis (p < 0.05). Sepsis was also associated with a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.74; 95% CI: 2.22–3.38, p < 0.001). Additionally, patients with sepsis had significantly higher odds of developing respiratory failure ([aOR] 4.21; 95% CI: 3.57–4.97, p < 0.001), requiring mechanical ventilation (aOR 2.64; 95% CI: 1.95–3.58, p < 0.001), and experiencing pulmonary embolism (aOR 1.59; 95% CI: 1.06–2.38, p < 0.001). Patients with sepsis also exhibited significantly higher odds of acute kidney injury (aOR 2.80; 95% CI: 2.35–3.33, p < 0.001) and deep venous thrombosis (aOR 2.94; 95% CI: 1.74–4.98). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the odds of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Conclusions: Hospitalizations for esophageal cancer complicated by sepsis are strongly linked to increased in-hospital mortality and severe complications. These findings highlight the urgent need for tailored interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with sepsis in this high-risk population. Future research should prioritize refining preventive measures and therapeutic strategies to enhance clinical outcomes for oncology patients facing these challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16068
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epidemiology and outcomes of sepsis in patients hospitalized with esophageal cancer: A nationwide analysis.

Ibrahim Shanti, Taysir Bsiso, Malik Samardali, James J. Kim
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

Epidemiology and outcomes of sepsis in patients hospitalized with esophageal cancer: A nationwide analysis.

Ibrahim Shanti, Taysir Bsiso, Malik Samardali, James J. Kim
article en

Abstract

e16068 Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) originates in the lining of the esophagus and often necessitates hospitalization in advanced stages. Sepsis, a severe and potentially fatal complication, poses significant challenges for hospitalized patients with EC. This study investigates and compares the outcomes of EC hospitalizations complicated by sepsis to enhance understanding and improve patient care strategies. Methods: Hospitalizations with a diagnosis of esophageal cancer were identified from the 2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) using ICD-10 codes. Patients were categorized based on the presence or absence of sepsis. Sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities were analyzed. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes included complication rates. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess associations, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. Results: Among the 34,030 hospitalizations for esophageal cancer, 4,190 (12.3%) involved sepsis. Patients in the sepsis group were older, with a mean age of 68.1 years compared to 67.3 years in those without sepsis (p < 0.05). Sepsis was also associated with a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.74; 95% CI: 2.22–3.38, p < 0.001). Additionally, patients with sepsis had significantly higher odds of developing respiratory failure ([aOR] 4.21; 95% CI: 3.57–4.97, p < 0.001), requiring mechanical ventilation (aOR 2.64; 95% CI: 1.95–3.58, p < 0.001), and experiencing pulmonary embolism (aOR 1.59; 95% CI: 1.06–2.38, p < 0.001). Patients with sepsis also exhibited significantly higher odds of acute kidney injury (aOR 2.80; 95% CI: 2.35–3.33, p < 0.001) and deep venous thrombosis (aOR 2.94; 95% CI: 1.74–4.98). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the odds of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Conclusions: Hospitalizations for esophageal cancer complicated by sepsis are strongly linked to increased in-hospital mortality and severe complications. These findings highlight the urgent need for tailored interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with sepsis in this high-risk population. Future research should prioritize refining preventive measures and therapeutic strategies to enhance clinical outcomes for oncology patients facing these challenges.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital (US), Bon Secours Mercy Health (US), Marshall Health (US), Marshall University (US), Northeast Ohio Medical University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.