How valuable are the questions and answers generated by large language models in oral and maxillofacial surgery?

This study demonstrates that while LLMs like ChatGPT4, ChatGPT4o, and Claude3-Opus exhibit robust capabilities in generating and solving oral and maxillofacial surgery questions, their performance is not without limitations. None of the models were able to answer correctly all the questions they generated themselves, highlighting persistent challenges such as AI hallucinations and contextual understanding gaps. The results also emphasize the importance of multimodal inputs, as questions with annotated images achieved higher accuracy rates compared to text-only prompts. Despite these shortcomings, the LLMs showed significant promise in problem-solving, logical consistency, and response fidelity, particularly in structured or numerical contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322529
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How valuable are the questions and answers generated by large language models in oral and maxillofacial surgery?

Kyu Hyung Kim, Bong-Chul Kim, Kwang Gi Kim, Young Jae Kim et al.
3 citations
PLoS ONE
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

How valuable are the questions and answers generated by large language models in oral and maxillofacial surgery?

Kyu Hyung Kim, Bong-Chul Kim, Kwang Gi Kim, Young Jae Kim, Sae Byeol Mun
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study demonstrates that while LLMs like ChatGPT4, ChatGPT4o, and Claude3-Opus exhibit robust capabilities in generating and solving oral and maxillofacial surgery questions, their performance is not without limitations. None of the models were able to answer correctly all the questions they generated themselves, highlighting persistent challenges such as AI hallucinations and contextual understanding gaps. The results also emphasize the importance of multimodal inputs, as questions with annotated images achieved higher accuracy rates compared to text-only prompts. Despite these shortcomings, the LLMs showed significant promise in problem-solving, logical consistency, and response fidelity, particularly in structured or numerical contexts.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
Gachon University (KR), Gachon University Gil Medical Center (KR), Wonkwang University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.