Early-onset gastric cancer: A comparison of metastatic and locoregional disease.

e16036 Background: The incidence of metastatic gastric cancer among young adults is rising and has a dismal prognosis with 5-year survival of only 4%. Little is known about the clinicopathologic features and symptoms associated with locoregional vs metastatic disease. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients treated for early-onset (age < 50 years) gastric cancer at the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and LA General Hospital from 2000-2022. Data from medical records (sociodemographic characteristics, tumor features, cancer predisposition risk factors and patterns of symptom presentation) were compared by extent of disease at presentation. Results: 275 patients were evaluable (104 locoregional, 142 metastatic, 29 unknown stage). There was no difference in stage at presentation by sex or insurance type. Racial/ethnic minorities were more likely to present with metastases (Table 1). There was no difference in BMI for locoregional or metastatic patients (p = 0.10); primary location of tumor, histologic characteristics (diffuse vs intestinal; adenocarcinoma with or without signet ring cell features). Of 163 patients with HER2 status, there was no association between HER2+ status and locoregional vs metastatic disease (p = 0.23) or race/ethnicity (p = 0.06). Locoregional patients were not more likely to have a known genetic cancer predisposition syndrome (p = 0.06) or a family history of cancer (p = 0.15). Patients with metastatic disease were more likely to have more symptoms (4 vs 3, p = 0.001) compared to locoregional, specifically ascites (OR 6.14 p = 0.001), fatigue (OR 3.16, p = 0.016), abdominal pain (OR 2.63, p < 0.001), and weight loss (OR 2.36, p = 0.001). Metastatic patients were less likely to have heartburn or indigestion (OR 0.50, p = 0.02). Patients with a negative endoscopy prior to diagnosis (n = 48, 17%) were equally likely to present with locoregional or metastatic disease (p = 0.21), even in those whose negative endoscopy was within 4 months prior to diagnosis (p = 0.15). Conclusions: Early detection of gastric cancer, especially in minoritized communities is crucial as these patients are more likely to present with metastatic disease. Although patients with metastatic disease had more symptoms, the type of symptoms, cancer predisposition risk and workup prior to diagnosis do not clearly identify an opportunity for early intervention. Further evaluation, including molecular characterization of metastatic vs locoregional patients may identify other factors contributing to poor outcomes. Race/Ethnicity LocoregionalN (%) MetastaticN (%) Missing StageN (%) TotalN (%) p-value Hispanic 62 (32.8) 102 (54.0) 25 (13.2) 189 (100) 0.034 Non-Hispanic Asian 13 (37.1) 21 (60.0) 1 (2.9) 35 (100) Non-Hispanic Black 3 (75.0) 1 (25.0) 4 (100) Non-Hispanic White 26 (55.3) 18 (38.3) 3 (6.4) 47 (100)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16036
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early-onset gastric cancer: A comparison of metastatic and locoregional disease.

Arthur Bookstein, Qi Nie, Chanita Hughes Halbert, Jessica Sheth Bhutada et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Early-onset gastric cancer: A comparison of metastatic and locoregional disease.

Arthur Bookstein, Qi Nie, Chanita Hughes Halbert, Jessica Sheth Bhutada, Justine Po, S. Iqbal, David R. Freyer, Myles Cockburn, Fox Bravo, Mary Cairns
article en

Abstract

e16036 Background: The incidence of metastatic gastric cancer among young adults is rising and has a dismal prognosis with 5-year survival of only 4%. Little is known about the clinicopathologic features and symptoms associated with locoregional vs metastatic disease. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients treated for early-onset (age < 50 years) gastric cancer at the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and LA General Hospital from 2000-2022. Data from medical records (sociodemographic characteristics, tumor features, cancer predisposition risk factors and patterns of symptom presentation) were compared by extent of disease at presentation. Results: 275 patients were evaluable (104 locoregional, 142 metastatic, 29 unknown stage). There was no difference in stage at presentation by sex or insurance type. Racial/ethnic minorities were more likely to present with metastases (Table 1). There was no difference in BMI for locoregional or metastatic patients (p = 0.10); primary location of tumor, histologic characteristics (diffuse vs intestinal; adenocarcinoma with or without signet ring cell features). Of 163 patients with HER2 status, there was no association between HER2+ status and locoregional vs metastatic disease (p = 0.23) or race/ethnicity (p = 0.06). Locoregional patients were not more likely to have a known genetic cancer predisposition syndrome (p = 0.06) or a family history of cancer (p = 0.15). Patients with metastatic disease were more likely to have more symptoms (4 vs 3, p = 0.001) compared to locoregional, specifically ascites (OR 6.14 p = 0.001), fatigue (OR 3.16, p = 0.016), abdominal pain (OR 2.63, p < 0.001), and weight loss (OR 2.36, p = 0.001). Metastatic patients were less likely to have heartburn or indigestion (OR 0.50, p = 0.02). Patients with a negative endoscopy prior to diagnosis (n = 48, 17%) were equally likely to present with locoregional or metastatic disease (p = 0.21), even in those whose negative endoscopy was within 4 months prior to diagnosis (p = 0.15). Conclusions: Early detection of gastric cancer, especially in minoritized communities is crucial as these patients are more likely to present with metastatic disease. Although patients with metastatic disease had more symptoms, the type of symptoms, cancer predisposition risk and workup prior to diagnosis do not clearly identify an opportunity for early intervention. Further evaluation, including molecular characterization of metastatic vs locoregional patients may identify other factors contributing to poor outcomes. Race/Ethnicity LocoregionalN (%) MetastaticN (%) Missing StageN (%) TotalN (%) p-value Hispanic 62 (32.8) 102 (54.0) 25 (13.2) 189 (100) 0.034 Non-Hispanic Asian 13 (37.1) 21 (60.0) 1 (2.9) 35 (100) Non-Hispanic Black 3 (75.0) 1 (25.0) 4 (100) Non-Hispanic White 26 (55.3) 18 (38.3) 3 (6.4) 47 (100)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Southern California (US), Children's Hospital of Los Angeles (US), University of Arizona (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.