Diabetic Foot Ulcer Diagnosis using Machine Learning

Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs) are a serious diabetes complication, which mostly results in infection, amputation, and increased mortality if not addressed timely. Proper classification of DFUs is critical for early treatment and improved clinical outcomes. In the context of DFU image classification, this study compares the effectiveness of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with traditional Machine Learning (ML) models Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN). The CNN model is shown to outperform other models with much higher accuracy since it can extract pertinent features automatically from the images, while ML models depend on manually designed features and have comparatively poorer performance. The research also points to some major gaps in DFU classification, such as excessive intra-class variability, small dataset size, and class imbalance. The results have real-world applicability in the healthcare field by yielding AI-based DFU classification for timely diagnosis and intervention. Future work can build on improving model performance by increasing the dataset size, using transfer learning, and real-time deployment in clinics. The proposed model achieved 90.5% accuracy, 87.2% precision, 85.8% recall, and an F1-score of 86.78%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/incacct65424.2025.11011469
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diabetic Foot Ulcer Diagnosis using Machine Learning

Monu Sharma, Meenu Gupta, Neha Gupta, Rakesh Kumar et al.
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Diabetic Foot Ulcer Diagnosis using Machine Learning

Monu Sharma, Meenu Gupta, Neha Gupta, Rakesh Kumar, Ayesha Mukthar
article en

Abstract

Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs) are a serious diabetes complication, which mostly results in infection, amputation, and increased mortality if not addressed timely. Proper classification of DFUs is critical for early treatment and improved clinical outcomes. In the context of DFU image classification, this study compares the effectiveness of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with traditional Machine Learning (ML) models Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN). The CNN model is shown to outperform other models with much higher accuracy since it can extract pertinent features automatically from the images, while ML models depend on manually designed features and have comparatively poorer performance. The research also points to some major gaps in DFU classification, such as excessive intra-class variability, small dataset size, and class imbalance. The results have real-world applicability in the healthcare field by yielding AI-based DFU classification for timely diagnosis and intervention. Future work can build on improving model performance by increasing the dataset size, using transfer learning, and real-time deployment in clinics. The proposed model achieved 90.5% accuracy, 87.2% precision, 85.8% recall, and an F1-score of 86.78%.

Chandigarh University (IN), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), Valley Health System (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diabetic Foot Ulcer Diagnosis using Machine Learning — Monu Sharma, Meenu Gupta, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS