Real world analysis of VTE incidence in lung cancer: A comprehensive assessment of the Khorana score and other clinical factors in predicting VTE incidence.

e23290 Background: Patients with lung cancer have increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). ASCO guidelines do not support routine VTE prophylaxis but encourage use of risk-stratification tools such as the Khorana Risk Score (KRS) to determine its need. We investigated the efficacy of the KRS and examined other clinical variables including demographics, actionable genomic alterations (AGA), and treatment regimens in predicting VTE risk in a real-world population of patients with advanced lung cancer. We also determined the impact of developing a VTE on healthcare utilization and overall survival (OS). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced lung cancer treated at our institution between 2015 and 2023. Our cohort included patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient demographics, genomics, treatment information, and outcomes were obtained via review of the medical record. Chi square analysis was used to assess the correlation between KRS and incidence of VTE. Results: 552 patients with advanced lung cancer, including 67 patients with ES-SCLC and 485 patients with NSCLC were analyzed. We observed VTE events in 123 patients (22.3%) with a median follow up period of 18.6 months. VTE occurred in 8 patients with ES-SCLC (11.9%) and 115 patients with NSCLC (23.7%). 51 patients developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT, 41.5%), 50 developed pulmonary embolism (PE, 40.7%),13 developed concurrent DVT and PE (10.6%), and 9 developed other types of VTE (7.3%). Median time to VTE was 251 days (range 39 – 1,108 days). Age less than 66 years (p = 0.0001), black race (p = 0.025), NSCLC histology (p = 0.03), and the presence of either EGFR, ALK, RET, or MET mutations were independently associated with increased risk of VTE in our patient population. Chi square analysis of VTE incidence did not show a correlation between low (0-1) and high (≥2) KRS across all patients (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.200). VTE incidence in patients on anticoagulation prior to treatment initiation was 5.6% versus 24.8% for those not on anticoagulation (p = 0.001). Among patients with a VTE, 40% had an ED visit, of which 80% resulted in hospitalization. Five hospitalized patients (4.1%) experienced thrombosis related mortality. Overall survival was not impacted by VTE diagnosis. Conclusions: KRS assigns intermediate risk (1 point) to patients with lung cancer, however, there are many distinct types of lung cancer. In our study population, KRS did not correlate with risk of VTE. We observed higher rates of VTE in patients with NSCLC vs SCLC. In patients with NSCLC, the presence of an AGA further increased their risk. Our results indicate that risk models need to account for the histologic and biologic heterogeneity among lung cancers to better identify patients at highest risk for VTE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e23290
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real world analysis of VTE incidence in lung cancer: A comprehensive assessment of the Khorana score and other clinical factors in predicting VTE incidence.

Ryan D. Gentzler, Wendy M. Novicoff, Nathan Roberts, Jack Masur et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Real world analysis of VTE incidence in lung cancer: A comprehensive assessment of the Khorana score and other clinical factors in predicting VTE incidence.

Ryan D. Gentzler, Wendy M. Novicoff, Nathan Roberts, Jack Masur, Alia Lynch, Sean C. Dougherty, Aditya Singh, Rishika Singh, Richard Hall, Caleb J.C. McKinney
article en

Abstract

e23290 Background: Patients with lung cancer have increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). ASCO guidelines do not support routine VTE prophylaxis but encourage use of risk-stratification tools such as the Khorana Risk Score (KRS) to determine its need. We investigated the efficacy of the KRS and examined other clinical variables including demographics, actionable genomic alterations (AGA), and treatment regimens in predicting VTE risk in a real-world population of patients with advanced lung cancer. We also determined the impact of developing a VTE on healthcare utilization and overall survival (OS). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced lung cancer treated at our institution between 2015 and 2023. Our cohort included patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient demographics, genomics, treatment information, and outcomes were obtained via review of the medical record. Chi square analysis was used to assess the correlation between KRS and incidence of VTE. Results: 552 patients with advanced lung cancer, including 67 patients with ES-SCLC and 485 patients with NSCLC were analyzed. We observed VTE events in 123 patients (22.3%) with a median follow up period of 18.6 months. VTE occurred in 8 patients with ES-SCLC (11.9%) and 115 patients with NSCLC (23.7%). 51 patients developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT, 41.5%), 50 developed pulmonary embolism (PE, 40.7%),13 developed concurrent DVT and PE (10.6%), and 9 developed other types of VTE (7.3%). Median time to VTE was 251 days (range 39 – 1,108 days). Age less than 66 years (p = 0.0001), black race (p = 0.025), NSCLC histology (p = 0.03), and the presence of either EGFR, ALK, RET, or MET mutations were independently associated with increased risk of VTE in our patient population. Chi square analysis of VTE incidence did not show a correlation between low (0-1) and high (≥2) KRS across all patients (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.200). VTE incidence in patients on anticoagulation prior to treatment initiation was 5.6% versus 24.8% for those not on anticoagulation (p = 0.001). Among patients with a VTE, 40% had an ED visit, of which 80% resulted in hospitalization. Five hospitalized patients (4.1%) experienced thrombosis related mortality. Overall survival was not impacted by VTE diagnosis. Conclusions: KRS assigns intermediate risk (1 point) to patients with lung cancer, however, there are many distinct types of lung cancer. In our study population, KRS did not correlate with risk of VTE. We observed higher rates of VTE in patients with NSCLC vs SCLC. In patients with NSCLC, the presence of an AGA further increased their risk. Our results indicate that risk models need to account for the histologic and biologic heterogeneity among lung cancers to better identify patients at highest risk for VTE.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.