Comparative efficacy of adjuvant FOLFOX versus FLOT following neoadjuvant FLOT in locally advanced gastric cancer.

e16120 Background: Perioperative FLOT is the gold-standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). However, the tolerability of adjuvant chemotherapy poses challenges, with many patients unable to complete treatment due to toxicity. This study compared the efficacy of adjuvant FLOT and FOLFOX in improving survival outcomes in LAGC patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant FLOT. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients with histologically confirmed LAGC (cT2-4, N0-3) treated at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital (January 2018 – September 2024). All patients received four cycles of neoadjuvant FLOT followed by surgical resection. Postoperatively, patients were stratified into three groups: adjuvant FLOT, FOLFOX, or no adjuvant therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox regression identified independent prognostic factors, including tumor regression grade (TRG), stage, and ECOG performance status (PS). Results: Among 171 patients (median age: 59 years; 77% male; median follow-up: 16.1 months), 105 received adjuvant FLOT, 37 received FOLFOX, and 29 received no adjuvant therapy. At 16 months, DFS and OS rates were 66% and 82%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in DFS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.30-1.33, p = 0.229) or OS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.24-2.37, p = 0.635) between the FLOT and FOLFOX groups. Advanced stage and absence of pathological response (TRG3) were associated with worse DFS (HR: 5.56, 95% CI: 2.38-14.29, p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 7.69, 95% CI: 2.33-25.00, p < 0.001). Patients without adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited significantly inferior survival compared to FLOT or FOLFOX groups (DFS HR: 10.00, p < 0.001; OS HR: 9.09, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Adjuvant FOLFOX demonstrated comparable efficacy to FLOT, offering a feasible alternative for patients with LAGC who exhibit poor ECOG PS or intolerance to intensive chemotherapy. These results highlight the importance of individualized treatment strategies in optimizing outcomes and minimizing toxicities in gastric cancer management. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore biomarkers that could refine patient selection for adjuvant regimens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16120
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative efficacy of adjuvant FOLFOX versus FLOT following neoadjuvant FLOT in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Hayriye Tatlı Doğan, Furkan Ceylan, Burak Bi̇lgi̇n, Safa Can Efil et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Comparative efficacy of adjuvant FOLFOX versus FLOT following neoadjuvant FLOT in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Hayriye Tatlı Doğan, Furkan Ceylan, Burak Bi̇lgi̇n, Safa Can Efil, Eren Göktuğ Ceylan, Doğan Uncu, Didem Şener Dede, Serhat Sekmek, Mehmet Alı Nahıt Şendur, Muhammed Bülent Akıncı, Ateş Kutay Tenekeci, Şebnem Yaman, Bülent Yalçın, Mehmet Çakmak
article en

Abstract

e16120 Background: Perioperative FLOT is the gold-standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). However, the tolerability of adjuvant chemotherapy poses challenges, with many patients unable to complete treatment due to toxicity. This study compared the efficacy of adjuvant FLOT and FOLFOX in improving survival outcomes in LAGC patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant FLOT. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients with histologically confirmed LAGC (cT2-4, N0-3) treated at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital (January 2018 – September 2024). All patients received four cycles of neoadjuvant FLOT followed by surgical resection. Postoperatively, patients were stratified into three groups: adjuvant FLOT, FOLFOX, or no adjuvant therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox regression identified independent prognostic factors, including tumor regression grade (TRG), stage, and ECOG performance status (PS). Results: Among 171 patients (median age: 59 years; 77% male; median follow-up: 16.1 months), 105 received adjuvant FLOT, 37 received FOLFOX, and 29 received no adjuvant therapy. At 16 months, DFS and OS rates were 66% and 82%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in DFS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.30-1.33, p = 0.229) or OS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.24-2.37, p = 0.635) between the FLOT and FOLFOX groups. Advanced stage and absence of pathological response (TRG3) were associated with worse DFS (HR: 5.56, 95% CI: 2.38-14.29, p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 7.69, 95% CI: 2.33-25.00, p < 0.001). Patients without adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited significantly inferior survival compared to FLOT or FOLFOX groups (DFS HR: 10.00, p < 0.001; OS HR: 9.09, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Adjuvant FOLFOX demonstrated comparable efficacy to FLOT, offering a feasible alternative for patients with LAGC who exhibit poor ECOG PS or intolerance to intensive chemotherapy. These results highlight the importance of individualized treatment strategies in optimizing outcomes and minimizing toxicities in gastric cancer management. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore biomarkers that could refine patient selection for adjuvant regimens.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Bilkent University (TR), Ankara Bilkent City Hospital (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.